RonHextallsShoulderPads Posted January 9, 2017 Report Posted January 9, 2017 these are all pretty straight forward, but it's the internet so someone is bound to disagree. -if you break your stick during play, the bench should be allowed to heave a stick onto the ice for you. each team designates one stick-heaver before the game. if said player is on the ice, it has to be the back-up goalie. -hitting the crossbar should count as a 1/2 a goal. -the puck is an outdated shape and size. should be star-shaped with a ball bearing in the middle like the game crossfire. -eliminate zambonis. don't resurface the ice the entire game. play it as it lies. -each team gets to dress one player in the opponent's uniform as a double agent. he must sit on your bench though. -every rink contains one pane of actual glass, to be randomized before the start of the game. -if two guys receive fighting majors, they have to sit in the same penalty box. Quote
MattPie Posted January 9, 2017 Report Posted January 9, 2017 I'm not sure, but I'd say your last one isn't exactly unpopular. The Sabres will make the finals but never win the cup with Eichel. There, I said it. I hope I'm wrong. Quote
Randall Flagg Posted January 9, 2017 Author Report Posted January 9, 2017 these are all pretty straight forward, but it's the internet so someone is bound to disagree. -if you break your stick during play, the bench should be allowed to heave a stick onto the ice for you. each team designates one stick-heaver before the game. if said player is on the ice, it has to be the back-up goalie. -hitting the crossbar should count as a 1/2 a goal. -the puck is an outdated shape and size. should be star-shaped with a ball bearing in the middle like the game crossfire. -eliminate zambonis. don't resurface the ice the entire game. play it as it lies. -each team gets to dress one player in the opponent's uniform as a double agent. he must sit on your bench though. -every rink contains one pane of actual glass, to be randomized before the start of the game. -if two guys receive fighting majors, they have to sit in the same penalty box. Awesome. Quote
WildCard Posted January 9, 2017 Report Posted January 9, 2017 Take the emotion and the personality out of the game and you start penalizing everyone for every little thing and you get the No Fun League. Let the players play Quote
pi2000 Posted January 9, 2017 Report Posted January 9, 2017 these are all pretty straight forward, but it's the internet so someone is bound to disagree. -if you break your stick during play, the bench should be allowed to heave a stick onto the ice for you. each team designates one stick-heaver before the game. if said player is on the ice, it has to be the back-up goalie. -hitting the crossbar should count as a 1/2 a goal. -the puck is an outdated shape and size. should be star-shaped with a ball bearing in the middle like the game crossfire. -eliminate zambonis. don't resurface the ice the entire game. play it as it lies. -each team gets to dress one player in the opponent's uniform as a double agent. he must sit on your bench though. -every rink contains one pane of actual glass, to be randomized before the start of the game. -if two guys receive fighting majors, they have to sit in the same penalty box. Great stuff. I particularly like the 0.5 goal for hitting the crossbar and making combatants sit in the same box. Heaving a stick could be dangerous... i think a better rule would be to allow players to use a broken stick... force them to use the broken stick, no going to the bench. Imagine Eichel on a breakaway with a mini-stick. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 9, 2017 Report Posted January 9, 2017 Great stuff. I particularly like the 0.5 goal for hitting the crossbar and making combatants sit in the same box. Heaving a stick could be dangerous... i think a better rule would be to allow players to use a broken stick... force them to use the broken stick, no going to the bench. Imagine Eichel on a breakaway with a mini-stick. Like, he'd likely have a regular-length stick at that point. Yeah? Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 9, 2017 Report Posted January 9, 2017 these are all pretty straight forward, but it's the internet so someone is bound to disagree. -if you break your stick during play, the bench should be allowed to heave a stick onto the ice for you. each team designates one stick-heaver before the game. if said player is on the ice, it has to be the back-up goalie. -hitting the crossbar should count as a 1/2 a goal. -the puck is an outdated shape and size. should be star-shaped with a ball bearing in the middle like the game crossfire. -eliminate zambonis. don't resurface the ice the entire game. play it as it lies. -each team gets to dress one player in the opponent's uniform as a double agent. he must sit on your bench though. -every rink contains one pane of actual glass, to be randomized before the start of the game. -if two guys receive fighting majors, they have to sit in the same penalty box. :thumbsup: Quote
inkman Posted January 10, 2017 Report Posted January 10, 2017 The difference between hockey and baseball/football/basketball is that hockey is a much much faster sport, every player is wearing full body armor and carrying a weapon. It's also much harder as a referee to catch every little infraction, especially behind the play (there's only 1 ref in youth/mens leagues). Over the course of an hour and half after getting cup checked, crossed checked in back, slashed behind the knees, by the same player(s) over and over and over every shift.... I don't care how laid back you are, you'll be pushed beyond your breaking point. You complain to refs, but they can't call what they don't see so when you get your chance to get your shot in, you'll take it. Or you just get thugs like Chara and Lucic who antagonize during play then do more damage after the whistle. This strategy is only fun if you have the thugs. When it's your stars and good players getting maimed after the whistle, you feel a little different. Quote
woods-racer Posted January 12, 2017 Report Posted January 12, 2017 The Sabres will make the finals but never win the cup with Eichel. There, I said it. I hope I'm wrong. Now that's more like it! Way to get in the spirit! I hope you're wrong also, the part about not winning the cup. Several trips to the finals and a cup or two would be just Jim Dandy. Quote
Marvelo Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 My unpopular opinion among others is that Jack Eichel wants the hell out of Buffalo. Quote
woods-racer Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 My unpopular opinion among others is that Jack Eichel wants the hell out of Buffalo. This I don't believe. He doesn't like to lose, that's for sure, but he knows the talent on this team and expects a lot more. Quote
WildCard Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 I don't want to foster a culture of losing Quote
millbank Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 I am outraged their is not more love for the Toronto Maple Leafs . More Love I say More Love Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 I am outraged their is not more love for the Toronto Maple Leafs . More Love I say More Love Good to see you millbank and drop by any time, just leave your Leaves love at the door ... ;) Some are expressing some anguish at what seems to be a faster rebuild by your beloved Leafs. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 I don't want to foster a culture of losing My unpopular hockey opinion of the day is that "culture of losing" isn't actually a thing. Quote
WildCard Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 My unpopular hockey opinion of the day is that "culture of losing" isn't actually a thing.Well yeah, cause you're wrong :lol: Quote
inkman Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 Well yeah, cause you're wrong :lol:Nope. It's another BS sports term like momentum and intangibles. Just words sports jerks use to explain things they can't explain. Quote
WildCard Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 Nope. It's another BS sports term like momentum and intangibles. Just words sports jerks use to explain things they can't explain.I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not Quote
Stoner Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 (edited) Kate Smith, not Bernie Parent, is the reason the Flyers beat the Sabres for the Cup in 75, and Ingrid Smolinska, not Dom Hasek, is the reason the Sabres made the finals in '99. #anthemsingersmatter Edited January 15, 2017 by PASabreFan Quote
SwampD Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 Momentum is real. Culture of losing is real. Anyone who doesn't think so, has never been a part of either. Quote
SwampD Posted January 16, 2017 Report Posted January 16, 2017 And it's not so much a "culture of losing". It's more like,... a culture of "not really caring if you lose" or "we'd like to win, but, whatever." Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted January 16, 2017 Report Posted January 16, 2017 Overtime should be 5 on 5 until someone wins (playoff style). If the next game is a matinee 12 hours later, oh well you should've won in regulation. The price you pay for getting paid millions to play a game. I hope Gionta resigns for 5 years. O'reilly never leads on the ice. Note: I am joking for one of the above. Quote
Tondas Posted January 16, 2017 Report Posted January 16, 2017 I like Jerry Sullivan. He's a columnist paid to write opinions that get people talking and selling newspapers. Plus, I think he's right 90% of the time. Quote
pi2000 Posted January 16, 2017 Report Posted January 16, 2017 And it's not so much a "culture of losing". It's more like,... a culture of "not really caring if you lose" or "we'd like to win, but, whatever." exactly Quote
Kristian Posted January 18, 2017 Report Posted January 18, 2017 I think the 2005-2007 teams were a fluke, and were only succesful due to the refs calling everything for a season and a half. The 2006 team would not have beaten Edmonton in the final. They took Carolina to seven games with their backup in net. If Rollie doesn't go down, Oilers take this one. The 1999 team wouldn't have won game 7 in Dallas. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.