Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That was not a bad call on Hudson. The guy was already out of the pay. He just didn't need to do that.

I like the idea of the kid bouncing back and forth between leagues. There's a lot to learn in both IMO.
Posted

I just think Provorov so clearly has better offensive hockey sense that I have a hard time believing he won't be a more impactful pro.

Before we depleted our firsts I was hoping we could move to get him. I think he is a star in the making

Posted

He's been pretty invisible, but then again was given 2 less minutes than Derek Grant through two periods, so I don't think he's been given a chance to do all that much.

 

Murray has to purge the roster of all plugs to save Bylsma from himself.

 

 

Kulikov makin' me proud!

 

He's looked quite good.

Posted

I like the idea of the kid bouncing back and forth between leagues. There's a lot to learn in both IMO.

Absolutely. We've been so starved for talent that we want them all up at 19.

Posted

So far I can't think of a "what the hell were you thinking " play by Okposo. So we got that going for us, which is nice.

Posted

Why hasn't Bailey been called up over Fasching?

 

My guess is they really want Bailey developing his offensive game, which he'd be unlikely to get a real chance to do here, whereas Fasching fits nicely on a bottom line (...but I still want him working on his offense).

Posted

I want Fasching to be getting big minutes in Rochester rather than 4th line minutes in the NHL.

 

It just doesn't matter at this point in his development.

Why hasn't Bailey been called up over Fasching?

 

 

Because Fasching is better player

Don't know if that's true, but Baily is further along so should be getting more minutes. there's still time for Fasching.

Posted

So far I can't think of a "what the hell were you thinking " play by Okposo. So we got that going for us, which is nice.

 

Meaning you thought that throughout the road trip? Really didn't see that at all. Thought he was one of our best players, if not our best.

Posted

Because Fasching is better player

Not sure I agree with that

 

My guess is they really want Bailey developing his offensive game, which he'd be unlikely to get a real chance to do here, whereas Fasching fits nicely on a bottom line (...but I still want him working on his offense).

This is what I was thinking. As much as I'd like to have them both down in the AHL getting big minutes, I believe Bailey is a little more equipped to be up here

Racism   :ph34r:

Murray paid Emelin too....

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...