Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I feel we can be critical of Murray while still being fine with the extension. As Flagg said, Pegula isn't afraid to swallow money. But secondly, this really is only Murray's second offseason of trying to improve the team. Realistically speaking, a GM should get a run of 4-5 years before judgment is passed IMO.

Posted (edited)

In here we see the Tim Murray in his natural habitat. Ever perceptive, the Tim Murray spots our camera man and his survival instincts kick in. First he freezes as he assesses the situation. Then after a brief pause, he proceeds on like normal.

 

- British Nature Documentarian

Edited by LGR4GM
Posted

I like TMs refreshing candor, but I honestly would have went the other way on most of his major decisions except drafting Sam and Jack. I won't rehash the past but I am not seeing the obvious way forward in his plan. If you are not patient enough to bet on all the draft picks we accumulated and trade them for "NHL" ready players, you can't then stand pat this off season and not continue to acquire "NHL" ready players to plug obvious holes when there is no one in the system to step in. I get contracts and cap, but then you have to deal roster players. And yes there were UFAs available. I am firmly behind this team, it is just tough watching other teams and seeing the plan and not seeing it here. And that includes Toronto.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...