Doohicksie Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 DD? Who is DD? Do you mean Dan Byslma? If so, then it should be DB. Local tribal tradition refers to him as Disco Dan, aka DD. Quote
Jerry Jabber Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 Local tribal tradition refers to him as Disco Dan, aka DD. Okay, makes sense. Thanks! Quote
Thorner Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 It is weird that Hot Daniel qualified anything with Vesey. I know it was off the cuff, but I don't like that he did that. Good call, PA. He said that because he knows we are getting Vesey. Vesey is signing here. Quote
nfreeman Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 It is weird that Hot Daniel qualified anything with Vesey. I know it was off the cuff, but I don't like that he did that. Good call, PA. It is strange that he did that -- and he mentioned Vesey twice in a short answer about playoff expectations -- unless he is highly confident that the Sabres are going to sign him. I think 95 points and playoffs is a bit of a stretch for this team yet. They're getting better, but teams will start to take them more seriously, meaning they won't start their backup tendies, etc... That will have a negative impact. I could see them floating around within shooting distance of 8th, but likely landing somewhere around 9-11th with a 5-10 point improvement, somewhere around 85-90 points. I completely agree with the bolded -- the Sabres didn't get the opponents' A games most nights. Hopefully that will change because the Sabres will be good enough to require it, but it will make it tougher to get wins. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 It is strange that he did that -- and he mentioned Vesey twice in a short answer about playoff expectations -- unless he is highly confident that the Sabres are going to sign him. Hmmmm. Quote
inkman Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 Nylander and Baptiste, Vesey icing on cake Why Baptiste? He was clearly behind Bailey, Carrier, Rodrigues and possibly Fasching last season. He said that because he knows we are getting Vesey. Vesey is signing here. Or he's an out if touch 50 something that doesn't understand how the CBA works and has bad info? Quote
Thorner Posted July 13, 2016 Report Posted July 13, 2016 Why Baptiste? He was clearly behind Bailey, Carrier, Rodrigues and possibly Fasching last season. Or he's an out if touch 50 something that doesn't understand how the CBA works and has bad info? Doubtful he'd be out of touch with the goings on of his own team. If he's not exceptionally confident Vesey is signing, the comments would be very odd. It could be just that, but the former seems more likely. Quote
North Buffalo Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 Sabres need a scorer, while the others overall game may be higher, Baptiste can score... that being said lets see what happens at the real camp. Quote
inkman Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 (edited) Sabres need a scorer, while the others overall game may be higher, Baptiste can score... that being said lets see what happens at the real camp.95 JUSTIN BAILEY RW 70 20 25 45 -7 16 4 0 186 10.822 PHIL VARONE (X) C 44 13 19 32 -23 20 4 1 89 14.6 65 MATT DONOVAN D 73 8 23 31 -23 61 5 0 119 6.7 28 WILLIAM CARRIER LW 56 13 17 30 14 48 0 0 123 10.6 15 EVAN RODRIGUES C 72 9 21 30 -15 39 2 0 160 5.6 20 JASON AKESON (X) RW 52 8 22 30 -17 18 3 0 136 5.9 16 CAL O'REILLY C 47 6 23 29 -20 6 3 0 81 7.4 13 NICK BAPTISTE RW 62 13 15 28 -3 30 1 0 92 14.1 If you say so... Edited July 14, 2016 by inkman Quote
North Buffalo Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 95 JUSTIN BAILEY RW 70 20 25 45 -7 16 4 0 186 10.8 22 PHIL VARONE (X) C 44 13 19 32 -23 20 4 1 89 14.6 65 MATT DONOVAN D 73 8 23 31 -23 61 5 0 119 6.7 28 WILLIAM CARRIER LW 56 13 17 30 14 48 0 0 123 10.6 15 EVAN RODRIGUES C 72 9 21 30 -15 39 2 0 160 5.6 20 JASON AKESON (X) RW 52 8 22 30 -17 18 3 0 136 5.9 16 CAL O'REILLY C 47 6 23 29 -20 6 3 0 81 7.4 13 NICK BAPTISTE RW 62 13 15 28 -3 30 1 0 92 14.1 If you say so... So he shows up at camp... remember him scoring last year and having couple big score sheets on the Roch. Quote
WildCard Posted July 14, 2016 Author Report Posted July 14, 2016 Okay, makes sense. Thanks! You....you should post more I think 95 points and playoffs is a bit of a stretch for this team yet. They're getting better, but teams will start to take them more seriously, meaning they won't start their backup tendies, etc... That will have a negative impact. I could see them floating around within shooting distance of 8th, but likely landing somewhere around 9-11th with a 5-10 point improvement, somewhere around 85-90 points. 35-36-11, and 2-7 in the shootouts. Getting even 5/11 of those games and we're a 10 point improvement. I can easily recall a handful of games we should have won. We'll get to 90 easily, and we should (better) make the playoffs. True said it earlier, it's how we get there; if we're completely healthy and miss the playoffs, and unless we hit 100pts or something absurd and miss out, I'm not happy Quote
WildCard Posted July 14, 2016 Author Report Posted July 14, 2016 (edited) “It’s nice to say that playoffs are a definite goal and you actually mean it when you say it,” general manager Tim Murray said after development camp wrapped up Tuesday in HarborCenter. “Ninety-five points is a nice number. I haven’t looked at it that close yet but expectations are the playoffs and to be competitive. “I’ve said all along we’re getting there. ... Our young kids that played on the team last year, we expect to take a step. We signed Kyle on July 1, which is a big step forward. We all believe there’s been lots of improvement here and there’s a lot of room for more. I don’t know where Dan came up with the 95 but I’ll take a look at that.” - GMTM http://sabres.buffalonews.com/2016/07/12/expectations-building-for-the-coming-sabres-season/ Edited July 14, 2016 by WildCard Quote
Thorner Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 Haha, the last sentence there by GMTM is the best. Also, looks like they are primarily just going with "Kyle" for Kyle Okposo. I like it. Quote
nfreeman Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 You....you should post more 35-36-11, and 2-7 in the shootouts. Getting even 5/11 of those games and we're a 10 point improvement. I can easily recall a handful of games we should have won. We'll get to 90 easily, and we should (better) make the playoffs. True said it earlier, it's how we get there; if we're completely healthy and miss the playoffs, and unless we hit 100pts or something absurd and miss out, I'm not happy If they get 5 Ws out of the 11 OTLs, that's a 5-point improvement, not 10, right? They need to be a few games over DeLuca .500 to make the playoffs -- e.g. 44-31-7. Quote
WildCard Posted July 14, 2016 Author Report Posted July 14, 2016 If they get 5 Ws out of the 11 OTLs, that's a 5-point improvement, not 10, right? They need to be a few games over DeLuca .500 to make the playoffs -- e.g. 44-31-7. ...yes, yes it is :doh: Quote
beerme1 Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 Okay, makes sense. Thanks! Ahhh Phoebe. She was at the top for me for quite a while after Fast Times. You....you should post more He's right.. More Phoebe! Quote
That Aud Smell Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 Ahhh Phoebe. She was at the top for me for quite a while after Fast Times. He's right.. More Phoebe! Phoebe? (That's not who's pictured in his profile pic.) Quote
beerme1 Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 Phoebe? (That's not who's pictured in his profile pic.) Who dat den? Phoebe Cates circa Fast Times at Ridgemont High man. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted July 14, 2016 Report Posted July 14, 2016 Who dat den? Phoebe Cates circa Fast Times at Ridgemont High man. I believe that's Leryn Franco - a South American track and field athlete. Quote
Drunkard Posted July 15, 2016 Report Posted July 15, 2016 I believe that's Leryn Franco - a South American track and field athlete. Not sure if this is right or not but there's no way it's the chick from Fast Times at Ridgemont High. The chick in his avatar is much more tan. Quote
beerme1 Posted July 16, 2016 Report Posted July 16, 2016 Not sure if this is right or not but there's no way it's the chick from Fast Times at Ridgemont High. The chick in his avatar is much more tan. I'm going to look into this. Quote
beerme1 Posted July 26, 2016 Report Posted July 26, 2016 Hey Jerry! Can you help me out? I've researched and cant post most of the pictures because Phoebe in most of the pics is showing ta tas and I 'm pretty sure I can't post that. And I can't figure out how to copy and paste ones with her top on and frankly don't want to. After all I'm talking about your avatar. Quote
rakish Posted July 26, 2016 Report Posted July 26, 2016 http://www.bellazon.com/main/topic/17244-leryn-franco/ Quote
beerme1 Posted July 27, 2016 Report Posted July 27, 2016 http://www.bellazon.com/main/topic/17244-leryn-franco/ Good work Rakish. I hope the error of my ways are overlooked. If you search pictures of Phoebe Cates in that red bikini from Fast Times At Ridgemont High, I think you'll how the mistake could be made :P Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.