Cam Fowler Trade Speculation Thread

[Derrico]

I could see them trading somebody like Marner plus a sweetener for Lindholm. I hope not, but it's definitely a possibility. Especially after they've been able to unload the Phaneuf, Clarkson, and Kessel contracts.

If your trading Marner your definitely not adding a sweetener IMO.  Marner looks legit.

[Claude_Verret]

f'real. this is non-negotiable.

 

one of the local t-shirt companies made a shirt about this and everything.

 

 

 

Chicken wings is acceptable, but never ever Buffalo wings.

[SwampD]

Chicken wings is acceptable, but never ever Buffalo wings.

word

[pi2000]

Never had Del Taco, is it good?

 

It's amazing.   The macho nachos are outrageous...

 

Think Mighty Taco on steroids.

 

[spndnchz]

With the Sunday paper or with a Nook???

No Nook in the bathroom! That's just gross.

[Samson's Flow]

No Nook in the bathroom! That's just gross.

What the difference between that and your cell phone? People use their phones in the bathroom all the time.

[spndnchz]

What the difference between that and your cell phone? People use their phones in the bathroom all the time.

I'd argue most don't share phones.

[Thorner]

No way we get Lindolm without Nylander as part of the package, or for Reinhart as the package. Need to send a true blue chipper the other way to get him.

Do you make the deal: Reinhart for Lindholm, straight up?

[Randall Flagg]

Do you make the deal: Reinhart for Lindholm, straight up?

I....I....I think I make that deal.

 

*barfs

*cries

[Derrico]

A Lindholm-Risto first pairing would be unreal.  But I don't think I could make that trade.

[Brawndo]

Do you make the deal: Reinhart for Lindholm, straight up?

 

No

[Thorner]

I don't think I make it either. But I would seriously consider it and think I could argue the merits of doing such.

 

But I keep Sam.

[WildCard]

Not even close for me. As bad as our defense is, our forward depth is drastically worse IMO

[beerme1]

Do you make the deal: Reinhart for Lindholm, straight up?

 

I do. I don't think they do.

I should say I would now. I wouldn't have not long ago.

[TrueBlueGED]

Do you make the deal: Reinhart for Lindholm, straight up?

I may possibly think about considering it at some point in the future I'm declining to specify at this time.

 

So maybe. I need more information.

-Can Reinhart play center at a high level?

-If he can, is the organization comfortable keeping him there and running a top tier center spine? Or is the team dead set on him being Jack's running mate?

 

If he can be the center many think he can, and the team is willing to run some combo of ROR-Eichel-Reinhart and attack teams with incredible balance, then I'm not willing to do it as it's robbing peter to pay Paul (quite literally pay, in this sense). But if he either can't play center well enough for whatever reason, or the team insists on him as a winger, then I make the trade. #1D simply has more value than even great wingers.

[WildCard]

As long as Larry's here I like Reinhart I Jack's wing

[TrueBlueGED]

As long as Larry's here I like Reinhart I Jack's wing

I love Larsson, but I'm becoming more concerned that he just doesn't have the offensive game to be a 3C on a contender.

[Thorner]

I do. I don't think they do.

I should say I would now. I wouldn't have not long ago.

 

I think they would. He's an established young player with a very high ceiling, a former #2 overall and very cost controlled right now and for at least another season, when they are in a tight spot with their D in regards to the cap.

 

I may possibly think about considering it at some point in the future I'm declining to specify at this time.

 

So maybe. I need more information.

-Can Reinhart play center at a high level?

-If he can, is the organization comfortable keeping him there and running a top tier center spine? Or is the team dead set on him being Jack's running mate?

 

If he can be the center many think he can, and the team is willing to run some combo of ROR-Eichel-Reinhart and attack teams with incredible balance, then I'm not willing to do it as it's robbing peter to pay Paul (quite literally pay, in this sense). But if he either can't play center well enough for whatever reason, or the team insists on him as a winger, then I make the trade. #1D simply has more value than even great wingers.

 

Very interesting. I would think the likelihood of Reinhart being unable to play center is low, but if you combine that with the odds of them not wanting to play Reinhart at center, the combined likelihood could very well be above 50%. If the deal was on the table right now, you may have to make the trade.  :P  :o

 

That future situation that would allow you to wait probably doesn't exist. 

[LGR4GM]

Dredge supposedly said he thinks the Ducks are not really interested in trading Lindholm

Edited October 26, 2016 by LGR4GM

[thewookie1]

Do you make the deal: Reinhart for Lindholm, straight up?

No, Reino is great, and good friends with our franchise's future star. What they'd want I would be unwilling to give.

[Brawndo]

Per @TSNBobMcKenzie: Lindholm/Ducks talks have heated up. Could have deal in 24-48 hrs. Maybe. Possibly.

[Thorner]

Per @TSNBobMcKenzie: Lindholm/Ducks talks have heated up. Could have deal in 24-48 hrs. Maybe. Possibly.

Talk about not putting yourself out there with a prediction even remotely concrete :lol:

[inkman]

I love Larsson, but I'm becoming more concerned that he just doesn't have the offensive game to be a 3C on a contender.

He'll be our 4th line center conceding the 3rd for Asplund

[Andrew Amerk]

Who is Cam Fowler?

[Brawndo]

Lindholm signed ramp up speculation