Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:16 AM, WildCard said:

Everyone who meets me describes me as a very loud, vulgar, but fun and nice ginger with a slight limp. I can only hope there's another poor sap with that description and I get to watch you pour a beer on him while screaming 'SOFIA!!!'

 

I forgot about the drunk playground thing. I shall pour beer on the first limping ginger I find. Assuming I am sober enough to pay attention, which may or may not be the case.

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:21 AM, PASabreFan said:

Do you really think YouTube comes after him for all the links we post to videos with copyrighted material?

I don't think copyright law works how you think it works...

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:21 AM, Hoss said:

Why has the literal entirety of this board turned on Sofia lately?

 

I don't know. I never thought she'd be so controversial, not to mention being in the minority for thinking she's gorgeous.

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:16 AM, WildCard said:

Everyone who meets me describes me as a very loud, vulgar, but fun and nice ginger with a slight limp. I can only hope there's another poor sap with that description and I get to watch you pour a beer on him while screaming 'SOFIA!!!'

Well, if you're up in the 300's Tuesday, I'll try to help TB based off that description alone. :p

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:21 AM, Hoss said:

Why has the literal entirety of this board turned on Sofia lately?

I'll back you up. Sophia is hot. She just is. There is just no way that Julie Bowen isn't a freak though, so she gets my vote.

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:21 AM, Hoss said:

Why has the literal entirety of this board turned on Sofia lately?

Are online things figurative or literal? Where do we draw the line on reality?? Is it only corporeal things!?!?
Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:21 AM, PASabreFan said:

Do you really think YouTube comes after him for all the links we post to videos with copyrighted material?

Well, Google, who owns YouTube, is not the argument here. It's taking revenue from the NHL. Either way, I really don't know
Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:24 AM, TrueBlueGED said:

Ew, sideboob scar.

 

(Do not misconstrue...I'd instantly forget about it if she were interested)

This was actually a big controversy. She got a breast reduction. It shouldn't be a controversy but of course it was because this is the 19th century.

Posted (edited)
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:23 AM, Taro T said:

Well, if you're up in the 300's Tuesday, I'll try to help TB based off that description alone. :p

You'll know it's me if I turn my head up and try to drink it :lol: Edited by WildCard
Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:24 AM, TrueBlueGED said:

Ew, sideboob scar.

 

(Do not misconstrue...I'd instantly forget about it if she were interested)

I love boobs.

Posted
  On 2/27/2016 at 4:26 AM, Hoss said:

This was actually a big controversy. She got a breast reduction. It shouldn't be a controversy but of course it was because this is the 19th century.

 

Learn something new every day. I had no idea. I don't care, but it really did stand out against the fair skin.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...