qwksndmonster Posted February 11, 2016 Report Posted February 11, 2016 WildCard and Thorny are in Hufflepuff. Quote
WildCard Posted February 11, 2016 Report Posted February 11, 2016 WildCard and Thorny are in Hufflepuff.You SOB Quote
Thorner Posted February 12, 2016 Report Posted February 12, 2016 WildCard and Thorny are in Hufflepuff. I'm reporting you. Quote
Neo Posted February 12, 2016 Report Posted February 12, 2016 It's from the distant future. It's Ryan Miller's grandson, Kale. Awesome ... Quote
Eleven Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 So what happens now? Send him back to Rochester until one of Larsson / McGinn is traded? Quote
WildCard Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 So what happens now? Send him back to Rochester until one of Larsson / McGinn is traded?We can't just send Moulson down? Quote
Taro T Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 So what happens now? Send him back to Rochester until one of Larsson / McGinn is traded? They only have 23 healthy guys up (assuming Catenacci is on IR, if not, like Emily used to say "nevermind"), so I'd guess he stays up until they're back home from C-bus. But I'd expect he's the healthy scratch Friday unfortunately. After that, he probably goes back until the next road trip. No idea who they bring up then. If Catenacci is healthy, I'd rather see him sent down than Bailey. Quote
Eleven Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 They only have 23 healthy guys up (assuming Catenacci is on IR, if not, like Emily used to say "nevermind"), so I'd guess he stays up until they're back home from C-bus. But I'd expect he's the healthy scratch Friday unfortunately. After that, he probably goes back until the next road trip. No idea who they bring up then. If Catenacci is healthy, I'd rather see him sent down than Bailey. Agreed on Catenacci, but I'd rather see Bailey play in Rochester than watch in Columbus. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 We can't just send Moulson down? Even though I think he's finished, I'd imagine the team would prefer to at least try to salvage some value out of his remaining years. That's not happening if we bury him in Rochester. Quote
Taro T Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 Agreed on Catenacci, but I'd rather see Bailey play in Rochester than watch in Columbus. True, it would be better for him to be playing, but after watching the 7D debacle there is no way they don't have a spare forward Friday. Amerks don't play until Friday, let the kid earn some spending money through Friday. Then have him drive to Syracuse on Saturday. Quote
Derrico Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 So what happens now? Send him back to Rochester until one of Larsson / McGinn is traded? I'd like to see him finish the year in Roch. He's had a nice taste and showed some promise. Keep his development going down on the year and don't burn a year of his ELC IMO. Quote
Ogre Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) I'd like to see him finish the year in Roch. He's had a nice taste and showed some promise. Keep his development going down on the year and don't burn a year of his ELC IMO. This is the most reasonable option to me. He was just starting to come on. He has seen what he needs to see. Giggidy. I said seen. Edited February 18, 2016 by iTInSn Quote
Weave Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 I'd like to see him finish the year in Roch. He's had a nice taste and showed some promise. Keep his development going down on the year and don't burn a year of his ELC IMO. He's on yr 1 of his contract whether he's in Roch or Buffalo, no? Probably belongs in Roch right now. If McGinn ends up traded, he's my 1st choice for a call up tho. Quote
Derrico Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 He's on yr 1 of his contract whether he's in Roch or Buffalo, no? Probably belongs in Roch right now. If McGinn ends up traded, he's my 1st choice for a call up tho. I thought it would be move back one more year if he doesn't play the 10 NHL games. I could be wrong on that. Either way, I agree that he belongs in Roch. Quote
Weave Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 I thought it would be move back one more year if he doesn't play the 10 NHL games. I could be wrong on that. Either way, I agree that he belongs in Roch. You are thinking of juniors. If he gets sent to juniors before playing 9 pro games we save a year of his contract. He's not eligible for juniors, his EL contract clock is ticking. Quote
Derrico Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 You are thinking of juniors. If he gets sent to juniors before playing 9 pro games we save a year of his contract. He's not eligible for juniors, his EL contract clock is ticking. Ahhhh, my apologies then. Quote
Eleven Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) He's with Girgensons and Eichel at practice today: Paul Hamilton @pham1717 49s50 seconds ago Lines 82 22 12. 44 17 26. 88 15 56. 9 43 23. Obviously Catenacci is back. Edited February 18, 2016 by Eleven Quote
Derrico Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 He's with Girgensons and Eichel at practice today: Paul Hamilton @pham1717 49s50 seconds ago Lines 82 22 12. 44 17 26. 88 15 56. 9 43 23. Obviously Catenacci is back. Excellent. I like him much more on their wing then McGinn. Quote
K-9 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 He's with Girgensons and Eichel at practice today: Paul Hamilton @pham1717 49s50 seconds ago Lines 82 22 12. 44 17 26. 88 15 56. 9 43 23. Obviously Catenacci is back. Not seeing Girg's number in that list. But if Bailey is gonna stay another game I am damned glad he is on a more talented line. GO SABRES!!! Quote
Eleven Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Not seeing Girg's number in that list. But if Bailey is gonna stay another game I am damned glad he is on a more talented line. GO SABRES!!! Sorry--I saw 88 and thought 28. It is McGinn with Eichel and Bailey. Quote
Derrico Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Sorry--I saw 88 and thought 28. It is McGinn with Eichel and Bailey. Thanks for getting my hopes up 11. Quote
Eleven Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Thanks for getting my hopes up 11. Meh, it's a practice without O'Reilly or Girgensons. Who knows who's actually going to be out there tomorrow? Quote
Derrico Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 Meh, it's a practice without O'Reilly or Girgensons. Who knows who's actually going to be out there tomorrow? Hhahahahha true, I was just messing with ya. So if Bailey is still up then who's sitting tomorrow night now that Kane is back? Quote
Brawndo Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 DB reported that Bailey being sent back to Amerks Quote
WildCard Posted February 18, 2016 Report Posted February 18, 2016 DB reported that Bailey being sent back to Amerks :( Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.