Iron Crotch Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Have we seen examples of luck trumping skill yet? Almost every game. A sea of one goal games decided by a lucky deflection (e.g., Risto's point shot last night that found its way through). Every team in the league basically plays .500 hockey, with a few exceptions like Washington and Dallas and Columbus. If you get the bounces you win, if not you lose. The only factors that seem to really matter are quality of goaltending (a "bad" goal is a killer in today's game) and special teams play (this is where offensive skill can win out). Otherwise, the 5-on-5 game is a game is pretty much a stalemate. Quote
Weave Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Almost every game. A sea of one goal games decided by a lucky deflection (e.g., Risto's point shot last night that found its way through). Every team in the league basically plays .500 hockey, with a few exceptions like Washington and Dallas and Columbus. If you get the bounces you win, if not you lose. The only factors that seem to really matter are quality of goaltending (a "bad" goal is a killer in today's game) and special teams play (this is where offensive skill can win out). Otherwise, the 5-on-5 game is a game is pretty much a stalemate. I'm refering to teams getting into the playoffs undeserving. Can't say I've seen that yet. Quote
CallawaySabres Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Sorry if this has been posted. But this is amazing https://twitter.com/ViasatSportFI/status/687250392644763649 I wish my son had picked a Risto jersey instead of Eichel Quote
MattPie Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 I'm refering to teams getting into the playoffs undeserving. Can't say I've seen that yet. Not really, since the bounces average out. But that's point, I think, going into each game thinking "I hope the lucky deflection through a screen goes our way tonight" sucks compared to "I hope our guys can out-skate and out-shoot the opponent". Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 I'm refering to teams getting into the playoffs undeserving. Can't say I've seen that yet. Happens every year, but it's limited to 1-2 teams. Just off the top of my head: Florida making it a few years back, Colorado two years ago, Calgary last year with LA missing. Colorado and Calgary rose ridiculous percentages in, Florida lower pointed their way in, and LA was unlucky in shootouts. Quote
Weave Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Happens every year, but it's limited to 1-2 teams. Just off the top of my head: Florida making it a few years back, Colorado two years ago, Calgary last year with LA missing. Colorado and Calgary rose ridiculous percentages in, Florida lower pointed their way in, and LA was unlucky in shootouts. Were they really more undeserving than the team that missed out though? Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Were they really more undeserving than the team that missed out though? I believe so, yes. When a team goes from playoffs to top pick (Florida) or drops 30 points in a year (Colorado), it's my opinion they didn't really deserve to make it on a talent and quality of play basis. Quote
Weave Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 (edited) I believe so, yes. When a team goes from playoffs to top pick (Florida) or drops 30 points in a year (Colorado), it's my opinion they didn't really deserve to make it on a talent and quality of play basis. In that given year, the team that missed out was no better. Not luck. I don't recall what changed with Florida, but didn't Colorado's drop occur after walking away from Statsny? I'd say that drop was change in personnel related, not because they lucked into the playoffs the previous season. Edited January 13, 2016 by We've Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 In that given year, the team that missed out was no better. Not luck. We will have to agree to disagree. In that given year, the team that missed out was no better. Not luck. I don't recall what changed with Florida, but didn't Colorado's drop occur after walking away from Statsny? I'd say that drop was change in personnel related, not because they lucked into the playoffs the previous season. You really think Paul Stastny is worth 10 spots in the standings? Varlamov came out of nowhere to win the Vezina and a year later his save percentage dropped back towards his career average. Luck. Quote
SwampD Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 When has luck ever not played a part in bottom teams getting in? Teams that get in, get in because they get in. Quote
Iron Crotch Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 While I'm at it... Last year, every single team in the league other than Arizona had a winning record when scoring first in a game (including the hapless Sabres). This year every team has a winning record when scoring first other than Vancouver (.500 when scoring first). Conversely, every team in the league has a losing record when the other team scores first except Dallas (.500) and the Kings (.500). The recipe for most teams seems to be to score first then pack it in defensively the rest of the way. I think that's exactly what we saw last night. Does this make for an exciting brand of NHL hockey? All a matter of opinion, I guess. I'll go to games and watch on TV regardless. Quote
Weave Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 (edited) We will have to agree to disagree. You really think Paul Stastny is worth 10 spots in the standings? Varlamov came out of nowhere to win the Vezina and a year later his save percentage dropped back towards his career average. Luck. Colorado won the Central the season prior to Stastny moving to StL. That isn't lucking into a playoff spot a more deserving team should have gotten. Those happen to the 7-8 seeds. And my whole point was, does any just miss team deserve to be in more than an 8 seed? They are generally so close you can't really argue one more deserving than another. Edited January 13, 2016 by We've Quote
JJFIVEOH Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 In that given year, the team that missed out was no better. Not luck. I don't recall what changed with Florida, but didn't Colorado's drop occur after walking away from Statsny? I'd say that drop was change in personnel related, not because they lucked into the playoffs the previous season. I believe so, yes. When a team goes from playoffs to top pick (Florida) or drops 30 points in a year (Colorado), it's my opinion they didn't really deserve to make it on a talent and quality of play basis. The Panthers that would the division were a bunch of fill ins while they kicked off their rebuild. He the team was gone the next year. That's why. It's not like the team that won the division was the same team that finished last. Quote
WildCard Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Happens every year, but it's limited to 1-2 teams. Just off the top of my head: Florida making it a few years back, Colorado two years ago, Calgary last year with LA missing. Colorado and Calgary rose ridiculous percentages in, Florida lower pointed their way in, and LA was unlucky in shootouts. Calgary making it last year and LA missing is the perfect example. LA lost something like 15 OT games whereas Calgary was just a statistical anomaly. Meanwhile the rosters barely change (if anything Clagary's got much better) and yet LA is dominating and Calgary paddling Quote
Eleven Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Love Risto. He's got all the chutzpah that Myers never had. Oh Myers showed chuptzpah and then some last night. But point taken. Quote
darksabre Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Oh Myers showed chuptzpah and then some last night. But point taken. All Myers did last night was have a spasm. Quote
Iron Crotch Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 All Myers did last night was have a spasm. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Colorado won the Central the season prior to Stastny moving to StL. That isn't lucking into a playoff spot a more deserving team should have gotten. Those happen to the 7-8 seeds. And my whole point was, does any just miss team deserve to be in more than an 8 seed? They are generally so close you can't really argue one more deserving than another. If Colorado winning the division on the back of a career year from Varlamov and some crazy shooting percentages, followed by missing the playoffs, isn't an example of having a lucky season I don't know what is. Sure they lost Stastny, but their young stars were a year older and they added Iginla. We're just on totally different planes of perspective here. The Panthers that would the division were a bunch of fill ins while they kicked off their rebuild. He the team was gone the next year. That's why. It's not like the team that won the division was the same team that finished last. I articulated my point poorly. Florida capitalized on a really weak division by playing suffocating hockey to squeeze games into OT for a point. So they earned it in a sense, but it was also the product of significant luck (the division having a putrid season). Regardless of roster turnover, repeating that season would have resulted in missing the playoffs the following season. Quote
Weave Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 If Colorado winning the division on the back of a career year from Varlamov and some crazy shooting percentages, followed by missing the playoffs, isn't an example of having a lucky season I don't know what is. Sure they lost Stastny, but their young stars were a year older and they added Iginla. We're just on totally different planes of perspective here. I articulated my point poorly. Florida capitalized on a really weak division by playing suffocating hockey to squeeze games into OT for a point. So they earned it in a sense, but it was also the product of significant luck (the division having a putrid season). Regardless of roster turnover, repeating that season would have resulted in missing the playoffs the following season. Not different perspective. Different context. Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 13, 2016 Author Report Posted January 13, 2016 Oh Myers showed chuptzpah and then some last night. But point taken. But Risto is so much smarter about how and when he does it. Quote
Kristian Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Sorry if this has been posted. But this is amazing https://twitter.com/ViasatSportFI/status/687250392644763649 I absolutely love that play. Just because. The Wild score, but that goal is the last thing on Parise's mind. Quote
dudacek Posted January 13, 2016 Report Posted January 13, 2016 Id say Anaheim this year is an example of bounces. Did Emerson Etem really switch them from one of th leagues best to one its worst, or did everybody else just get bad overnight? Quote
Stoner Posted January 14, 2016 Report Posted January 14, 2016 Has anyone nicknamed Larsson, Foligno and Gionta The Terrible Twos yet? Quote
dudacek Posted January 14, 2016 Report Posted January 14, 2016 Has anyone nicknamed Larsson, Foligno and Gionta The Terrible Twos yet? Well, they are pretty t..... (Somebody had to or you would have been very disappointed). Quote
inkman Posted January 14, 2016 Report Posted January 14, 2016 Has anyone nicknamed Larsson, Foligno and Gionta The Terrible Twos yet? I like the deuce line for a couple of reasons Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.