Doohicksie Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Even without Eichel, Girgs is still looking dangerous. Quote
French Collection Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Power forward move Girgs! Quote
clintwestwood Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Dying for some kind of Eichel update here. Quote
Brawndo Posted January 1, 2016 Author Report Posted January 1, 2016 Joe Yerdon @JoeYerdon 1m 1 minute ago Eichel just came back from the Sabres room and is on the bench Quote
woods-racer Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 (edited) Rienhart getting Jack's shift? Never mind Edited January 1, 2016 by Woods-Racer Quote
sodbuster Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 If you don't ask him to play against the other teams top 2 lines he does his job well.It's amazing isn't it? He's just looked pretty good in the offensive zone, gluing himself to the boards and keeping play going. Quote
Sabel79 Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Joe Yerdon @JoeYerdon 1m 1 minute ago Eichel just came back from the Sabres room and is on the bench Also per Yerdon: Shaking out right leg. Uh-oh... Quote
clintwestwood Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Joe Yerdon @JoeYerdon 1m 1 minute ago Eichel just came back from the Sabres room and is on the bench :worthy: Quote
Huckleberry Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 jesus christ MSG, what is with all the rangers love on a Islanders , sabres game. Quote
Sabel79 Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Also per Yerdon: Shaking out right leg. Uh-oh... or not... Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Is it just me, or do the Sabres have like 500 SOG and the Islanders many fewer than that. Quote
woods-racer Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Is it just me, or do the Sabres have like 500 SOG and the Islanders many fewer than that. No, you're right. Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Well hell. Goalie interference? Quote
woods-racer Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 See, I'm snarky with NS and they give up a goal. My bad. Quote
Sabel79 Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 This one oughtta take about 20 minutes... Quote
Huckleberry Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 lol wtf thought that would be a good challenge. Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 I see both sides of that. Had the puck been under, instead of behind, Linus, they would have overturned it. Sabres: 0 Isles: :death: We got 'em right where we want 'em. :nana: Quote
clintwestwood Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Horrible call. Puck was covered and pushed out when he slid his stick under the pads, which also caused Ullmark to visibly slide backwards. What a joke. Quote
Cityo'Rasmii Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 This one oughtta take about 20 minutes... Glad I just got another Stone Ruination. . . Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 1, 2016 Report Posted January 1, 2016 Personally, I think any touching of the goalie by the opposition should be goalie interference. PERIOD. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.