Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm telling you ... I will never understand how this rule improves anyone's hockey experience ... Minutes, momentum, and still the width of a hair either way ... who thinks this is a good idea ...?

Posted

Have we had a PP yet, there's no sound at this bar, but I've seen some clear missed calls on Florida, and eichel getting punched but ending up in the box.... I also saw 2 garbage challenges that sucks.... 2-1 that's the score

Posted

Girgensons got dropped in front of the net there before he ever had the puck. How's that work?

 

I'm glad I wasn't the only one that thought that was interference

Posted (edited)

I just don't see the need given the friggin delay it causes. Has there been a rash of crucial goals scored after missed offsides in recent years? Bad rule all around.

 

Give it a time limit to go back at least.  24 friggin seconds after the offsides........

 

I get it if the play was off the rush.  That entry was eons ago.

Edited by We've
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...