Patrick Kane: [Updated] D.A. Decides Not to Prosecute; NHL Determines Claims "Unfounded"

[Johnny DangerFace]

Did you guys happen to miss the word 'if'?

 

Keep putting words in my mouth and then criticizing what you hoped I said. Yet, I'm the foolish one.

 

Thanks for reminding me why I avoided this thread. 

 

I didn't say that. But thanks for playing. 

 

how about you actually say something coherent, instead of popping into the thread every few days to say a meaningless ambiguous statement that tends to be offensive or conspiracy level dumb.  Then cry about everyone out to get you. No one is out to get you, you just dont make sense

 

 

 

And jj, you "if" statement is whats wrong with it.  You are saying if she went to the hospital, then tampering couldn't possibly happen (which is silly).  So you are either saying it wasn't tampered with or she didn't go straight to the hospital.  

Edited September 23, 2015 by Johnny DangerFace

[darksabre]

Did you guys happen to miss the word 'if'?

 

Keep putting words in my mouth and then criticizing what you hoped I said. Yet, I'm the foolish one.

 

Thanks for reminding me why I avoided this thread. 

 

I didn't say that. But thanks for playing. 

###### you people are quick to make assumptions. 

What are you talking about? Seriously. None of us have a clue what you are saying. 

[shrader]

Did you guys happen to miss the word 'if'?

 

Keep putting words in my mouth and then criticizing what you hoped I said. Yet, I'm the foolish one.

 

Thanks for reminding me why I avoided this thread. 

 

I didn't say that. But thanks for playing. 

###### you people are quick to make assumptions. 

 

Even with that word if, I still have no idea what you are trying to say here.  I'm really not trying to jump on you here, but when many people wind up having the same exact interpretation of what you said, it tends to be a pretty good sign that you need to find a better way of phrasing these thoughts.

[LGR4GM]

Did you guys happen to miss the word 'if'?

 

Keep putting words in my mouth and then criticizing what you hoped I said. Yet, I'm the foolish one.

 

Thanks for reminding me why I avoided this thread. 

 

I didn't say that. But thanks for playing. 

###### you people are quick to make assumptions. 

What are you saying?  I am still confused. 

[JJFIVEOH]

If she had gone to the hospital like the original story had claimed, then authorities would have been in possession of the evidence. So either this new story is bogus or somebody up real bad. 

 

Nowhere did I imply that she didn't go to the hospital. 

[That Aud Smell]

Wouldn't surprise me if each of them get a call from the administrative judge this afternoon.

 

I was thinking the same thing. Paula won't take kindly to all this nonsense.

 

I didn't say that. But thanks for playing. 

###### you people are quick to make assumptions. 

 

You put those issues in play. In so doing, you implied that they were legitimate sources of inquiry. They were not. They are not. 

[Johnny DangerFace]

If she had gone to the hospital like the original story had claimed, then authorities would have been in possession of the evidence. So either this new story is bogus or somebody ###### up real bad. 

 

Nowhere did I imply that she didn't go to the hospital. 

 

Uh huh.  You don't get logical inferences.  That's why you always imply something ridiculous and then whine about people calling you out on it.  You stated if she went to the hospital then there wouldnt be tampering.  If there is tampering then ________ .  We just fill in the logical conclusions to your goofy statements

[LGR4GM]

I could have sworn that originally the story said that she was immediately driven, by her friend, to the hospital where they performed a rape kit on her. 

 

Way too many holes in this story...................

 

 

As opposed to what? 

 

 

 

As opposed to not going to the hospital. 

 

Who took her to the hospital wasn't the focal point of my post. The focal point was whether she went at all. If she didn't go to the hospital then her story could be bogus. If she did go to the hospital, authorities would have been in possession of the evidence. 

 

If she actually went to the hospital, a rape kit would have been performed, law enforcement would have been notified and there would have been no tampering. 

 

 

I am not following you. 

 

 

So he is suggesting that she didn't go to the hospital right after it allegedly took place and therefore there was not rape kit down?

 

 

Did you guys happen to miss the word 'if'?

 

Keep putting words in my mouth and then criticizing what you hoped I said. Yet, I'm the foolish one.

 

Thanks for reminding me why I avoided this thread. 

 

 

If she had gone to the hospital like the original story had claimed, then authorities would have been in possession of the evidence. So either this new story is bogus or somebody ###### up real bad. 

 

Nowhere did I imply that she didn't go to the hospital. 

Again, I am still confused. 

[That Aud Smell]

I could have sworn that originally the story said that she was immediately driven, by her friend, to the hospital where they performed a rape kit on her. 

 

Way too many holes in this story...................

 

As opposed to not going to the hospital. 

 

Who took her to the hospital wasn't the focal point of my post. The focal point was whether she went at all. If she didn't go to the hospital then her story could be bogus. If she did go to the hospital, authorities would have been in possession of the evidence. 

 

If she actually went to the hospital, a rape kit would have been performed, law enforcement would have been notified and there would have been no tampering.

 

Nowhere did I imply that she didn't go to the hospital. 

 

Fook's sake, man.

Edited September 23, 2015 by That Aud Smell

[JJFIVEOH]

I was thinking the same thing. Paula won't take kindly to all this nonsense.

 

 

You put those issues in play. In so doing, you implied that they were legitimate sources of inquiry. They were not. They are not. 

 

"If she actually did go to the hospital"............. isn't the same as "Perhaps she really didn't go to the hospital". Especially when you consider the statement followed which was "then a rape kit would have bee performed". 

 

It's not my fault you can't comprehend if/then logic. 

I'm out. 

[sabills]

If she had gone to the hospital like the original story had claimed, then authorities would have been in possession of the evidence. So either this new story is bogus or somebody ###### up real bad. 

 

Nowhere did I imply that she didn't go to the hospital. 

 

I think we're all confused with where you got the bolded. We're all on the somebody up real bad train.

[shrader]

So I just read through one of the stories about this and realized that, according to the attorney, it was just the bag that was left at her house.  So where is the actual rape kit and any other evidence that was supposed to be inside that bag?

[Johnny DangerFace]

"If she actually did go to the hospital"............. isn't the same as "Perhaps she really didn't go to the hospital". Especially when you consider the statement followed which was "then a rape kit would have bee performed". 

 

It's not my fault you can't comprehend if/then logic. 

I'm out. 

 

LOL.  Please do stay out

Edited September 23, 2015 by Johnny DangerFace

[JJFIVEOH]

Stay classy................

[That Aud Smell]

It's not my fault you can't comprehend if/then logic. 

I'm out. 

 

Nor is it my fault that you won't own what you said and clearly implied - whether you intended to do so or not.

 

Also, I am confident that, as you suggest, I am utterly incapable of following your logic.

 

So I just read through one of the stories about this and realized that, according to the attorney, it was just the bag that was left at her house.  So where is the actual rape kit and any other evidence that was supposed to be inside that bag?

 

Wha ---???

Edited September 23, 2015 by That Aud Smell

[Johnny DangerFace]

Stay classy................

 

Yea, tell people they can't understand logic when you imply the ###### out of something and then act confused when they think that.  Stop saying you are leaving every post too

Edited September 23, 2015 by Johnny DangerFace

[darksabre]

"If she actually did go to the hospital"............. isn't the same as "Perhaps she really didn't go to the hospital". Especially when you consider the statement followed which was "then a rape kit would have bee performed".

 

It's not my fault you can't comprehend if/then logic.

 

I'm out.

Sorry but you're the one who is failing to string a coherent thought together here. That's not everyone else's problem. Be more clear.

[shrader]

Sorry but you're the one who is failing to string a coherent thought together here. That's not everyone else's problem. Be more clear.

 

Like I said before, when every single poster reads something the same exact way, the problem is with the writer, not the readers.

[darksabre]

So I just read through one of the stories about this and realized that, according to the attorney, it was just the bag that was left at her house. So where is the actual rape kit and any other evidence that was supposed to be inside that bag?

The evidence could easily have been retained in another container and the kit bag discarded, in which case this story is a matter of trash picking. But we have no idea.

[shrader]

The evidence could easily have been retained in another container and the kit bag discarded, in which case this story is a matter of trash picking. But we have no idea.

 

It will be interesting to hear whether or not there are some cameras on that home or in that neighborhood.

[That Aud Smell]

The evidence could easily have been retained in another container and the kit bag discarded, in which case this story is a matter of trash picking. But we have no idea.

 

Hmm. 

 

Solid creative thinking. (I want you on my workshop problem solving team!)

 

But that seems unlikely, nah?

Edited September 23, 2015 by That Aud Smell

[darksabre]

Hmm. 

 

Solid creative thinking. (I want you on my workshop problem solving team!)

 

But that seems unlikely, nah?

I don't know. I don't have a clue how evidence like this is handled. 

 

You can be in my kitchen cabinet too haha 

[JJFIVEOH]

Like I said before, when every single poster reads something the same exact way, the problem is with the writer, not the readers.

 

Ask TAS, he said I was pretty clear on what he hoped I said.

[sabills]

Brian Mazurowski

@BMaz1

 

Statement from Erie County Central Police Srvcs says that all evidence in Kane case is accounted for & remains in its original packaging

Edited September 23, 2015 by sabills

[X. Benedict]

The evidence could easily have been retained in another container and the kit bag discarded, in which case this story is a matter of trash picking. But we have no idea.

 

The idea that the bag was discarded and the victims name was left on it. 

That's a little nutty too. 

 

Leaving the victims name on any trash sounds like it would be a huge gaff. 

Edited September 23, 2015 by X. Benedict