TrueBlueGED Posted February 8, 2016 Report Posted February 8, 2016 I've said it before, I would like to see Bernier here, I think that getting out of Toronto would do him some good and he could give Lehner a run for the starting job. I know it won't happen cause Murray chose Lehner and that's his guy.... Bernier is giving AHL-level goaltending this season and was way below average last season (30th in the league). But you'd still like to see him here because he's your guy. Kind of amusing to see you doing the very thing you've been ripping Murray for re: Lehner. Quote
nfreeman Posted February 8, 2016 Report Posted February 8, 2016 Byfuglien re-signs for 5 years, $38MM -- making those of us who predicted $7.5MM or so per year look pretty clevah indeed. Quote
qwksndmonster Posted February 8, 2016 Report Posted February 8, 2016 Byfuglien re-signs for 5 years, $38MM -- making those of us who predicted $7.5MM or so per year look pretty clevah indeed. I just never know what to expect from you, Freeman. :lol: Quote
Brawndo Posted February 8, 2016 Report Posted February 8, 2016 Dreger: "Trouba, I'm told, wants somewhere in the vicinity of a six-year term and around $6.5 million per year." #NHLJets Quote
dudacek Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Dreger: "Trouba, I'm told, wants somewhere in the vicinity of a six-year term and around $6.5 million per year." #NHLJets Is he better than Barkov? Hell, is he better than Myers? Quote
nfreeman Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 I just never know what to expect from you, Freeman. :lol: When your in-laws sound like the guys in "Good Will Hunting" you pick up a few things. Quote
WildCard Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 (edited) Sounds like Florida is out of the Ladd running @GeorgeRichards Have read stuff regarding the #FlaPanthers and Andrew Ladd...have been told "zero interest" on their end. Edited February 9, 2016 by WildCard Quote
Hoss Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Posted February 9, 2016 They might be interested if Barkov's injury is serious. Took a shot to the head from Abdelkader. Quote
WildCard Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 They might be interested if Barkov's injury is serious. Took a shot to the head from Abdelkader. Cheap shot? Quote
Hoss Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Posted February 9, 2016 Cheap shot? Not really. Quick play. Tough call, I think. Quote
Hoss Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Posted February 9, 2016 (edited) Dreger: Hearing lots of Dion Phaneuf trade chatter. Starting to think he could actually be dealt before the deadline. Dreger adds that Ottawa is one team after him. Edited February 9, 2016 by Hoss Quote
Hoss Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Posted February 9, 2016 Sounds like this is happening, per Bob McKenzie: Details sketchy, no confirmation, but sounds like OTT/TOR working on a trade involving Leaf captain Dion Phaneuf. Let's see where this goes. Quote
WildCard Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Sounds like this is happening, per Bob McKenzie: Details sketchy, no confirmation, but sounds like OTT/TOR working on a trade involving Leaf captain Dion Phaneuf. Let's see where this goes. That is not the team I would have picked him going to Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 I have a new plan for Moulson: give him the Hodgson/Phaneuf treatment. Huge offensive opportunity, completely sheltered on defense, best linemates we can give him. Pump up that offensive production and trade him baby! No, I don't think it would work. But it's time to try, dammit! Yes, this is 100% inspired by Toronto somehow trading Phaneuf without retaining salary or taking back a similarly bad contract. Unreal. Quote
nfreeman Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 I have a new plan for Moulson: give him the Hodgson/Phaneuf treatment. Huge offensive opportunity, completely sheltered on defense, best linemates we can give him. Pump up that offensive production and trade him baby! No, I don't think it would work. But it's time to try, dammit! Yes, this is 100% inspired by Toronto somehow trading Phaneuf without retaining salary or taking back a similarly bad contract. Unreal. But Phaneuf is still a real NHL player. He plays over 22 min per game, is on a 40-pt pace, produces a respectable number of SOG and hits, and still serves as an intimidator on D. Moulson, OTOH, would not be in the NHL at this point if not for his contract. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 But Phaneuf is still a real NHL player. He plays over 22 min per game, is on a 40-pt pace, produces a respectable number of SOG and hits, and still serves as an intimidator on D. Moulson, OTOH, would not be in the NHL at this point if not for his contract. Oh, I'm with you. My post was 95% in jest :) Quote
Hoss Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Posted February 9, 2016 Might have our second d trade of the day: Hearing that #oilers Justin Schultz being scratch tonight vs #devils might be trade related. #tvasports Quote
Derrico Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Might have our second d trade of the day: Hearing that #oilers Justin Schultz being scratch tonight vs #devils might be trade related. #tvasports Wow, Buff, Phaneuf and Schultz all off the market within a couple of days. Buff really was holding up the trade market. This must increase the value of any available Dmen. If Gorges could be had for a 1st, we move him right? Quote
... Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 It wouldn't surprise me that GMTM is angling for any first he can get for this draft. Quote
nfreeman Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Wow, Buff, Phaneuf and Schultz all off the market within a couple of days. Buff really was holding up the trade market. This must increase the value of any available Dmen. If Gorges could be had for a 1st, we move him right? The Sabres aren't going to get a #1 for any of their rentals unless they include at least a #3. Quote
qwksndmonster Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 GMTM doesn't care about 3rd round picks! He'll just snipe diamonds with our two 7ths. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 The Sabres aren't going to get a #1 for any of their rentals unless they include at least a #3. As chance has it, they have several of those. Quote
Eleven Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 The Sabres aren't going to get a #1 for any of their rentals unless they include at least a #3. I'm not interested in the Sabres trading McGinn for any picks other than a #1 straight up. Quote
qwksndmonster Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 I'm not interested in the Sabres trading McGinn for any picks other than a #1 straight up. If it's a seller's market we'll get a 1st. Otherwise, he's just worth a 2nd. Quote
Eleven Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 If it's a seller's market we'll get a 1st. Otherwise, he's just worth a 2nd. Then sign him and keep him. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.