Brawndo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Down to who? LA? Anaheim? Montreal called and the price was Sergchev they said non. Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Anaheim? Montreal called and the price was Sergchev they said non. Montreal called us? Sergachev is pretty low on my list of players I want in return for Kane so I'm okay with that Quote
Brawndo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Montreal called us? Sergachev is pretty low on my list of players I want in return for Kane so I'm okay with that Someone tweeted that and some Media Types from Buffalo and Bloggers ran with it. Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Someone tweeted that and some Media Types from Buffalo and Bloggers ran with it. I'll take Galchenyuck from them please Quote
Randall Flagg Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Sooooo Brodin will only cost us Fasching and a pick then, right? :) Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Twitter has it that Minnesota is refusing to part with their top prospects; this deal happened because their cupboard is loaded and they have an aging core that needs to win now. Picks don't matter to Minnesota at all Quote
Brawndo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 With that prospect pool, they don't need them Quote
Brawndo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 So we just became sellers If it took Murray until tonight to become a seller, I'm very worried. Quote
Two or less Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 If it took Murray until tonight to become a seller, I'm very worried. Exactly right. I think we were going to try to sell on Franson and Kulikov regardless of how we would've came out after the bye Quote
Marvelo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 (edited) I want to trade Kane for D help, but I'd be pretty disappointed if the return were to be Brodin. I'm trying to think of the last time GMTM traded for a good defenseman that stuck with the team...never. Edited February 27, 2017 by Marvelo Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Rumors of the week; Gionta to the Island? http://thehockeywriters.com/2017-nhl-trade-deadline-rumor-tracker/ Quote
Thorner Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 I want to trade Kane for D help, but I'd be pretty disappointed if the return were to be Brodin. Granted the Minnesota rumours have been debunked, but in light of the Hall-Larsson deal, Brodin is almost exactly the type of player I would guess we'd get back in a deal where Kane is involved. Kane may be viewed similarly to Hall in the sense that Both players are seemingly carrying some "baggage". We are all familiar with Kane's situation, and Hall, whether fairly or not, was seemingly saddled with the Oilers ineptitude and losing ways that persisted while he was an Oiler. I don't necessarily think that the Hanzal (so hot right now) deal will mean much relative to a Kane deal. Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 @WGR550 50m50 minutes ago More Button - I'm not trading Guhle, Nylander, or Asplund, and if you want a guy like Cliff Pu you better be making me a good offer #Sabres Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Granted the Minnesota rumours have been debunked, but in light of the Hall-Larsson deal, Brodin is almost exactly the type of player I would guess we'd get back in a deal where Kane is involved. Kane may be viewed similarly to Hall in the sense that Both players are seemingly carrying some "baggage". We are all familiar with Kane's situation, and Hall, whether fairly or not, was seemingly saddled with the Oilers ineptitude and losing ways that persisted while he was an Oiler. I don't necessarily think that the Hanzal (so hot right now) deal will mean much relative to a Kane deal. I think this is probably right, which is why I don't think we see a move in the near term. Quote
dudacek Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 I am pretty sure that the only reason you see Kane's name out there is because of the Minnesota and Anaheim situations. They are the only teams with players that might be available that meet the Sabres needs and you aren't getting guys like that without giving up quality in return. Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 I am pretty sure that the only reason you see Kane's name out there is because of the Minnesota and Anaheim situations. They are the only teams with players that might be available that meet the Sabres needs and you aren't getting guys like that without giving up quality in return. Philly, LA Quote
dudacek Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Philly, LA Philly certainly has a lot of young D, but they have no protection issues. Worth talking to for sure. The LA rumour puzzles me from the Sabres side. Muzzin seems too old for the Sabres needs and the Kings pipeline sucks. I don't see a fit for Murray. At least there's no one there that I would consider moving Kane for. Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Philly certainly has a lot of young D, but they have no protection issues. Worth talking to for sure. The LA rumour puzzles me from the Sabres side. Muzzin seems too old for the Sabres needs and the Kings pipeline sucks. I don't see a fit for Murray. At least there's no one there that I would consider moving Kane for. Yeah I've never been a big fan of the LA rumors. Muzzin 2 years ago? Sure. Much rather get a younger d-man for Kane now if we move him Quote
Brawndo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Shattenkirk to Caps or Pens per Lawton. Rangers in the mix as well. Per Chad Domenics Franson maybe a fall back option for them Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Shattenkirk to Caps or Pens per Lawton. Rangers in the mix as well. Per Chad Domenics Franson maybe a fall back option for them Interested to see if rental or not. NYR reportedly wouldn't pay the price because they know Shattenkirk will just sign with them this summer anyways I'd bet the Caps get him. That is a team that reeks of all in Quote
Brawndo Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Per Jim Matheson If Oilers want to retrieve G Anders Nilsson from Buff to back up Talbot may cost 4th rounder. MacT scouted Buff last 2 gms. Quote
WildCard Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 I want more for Nilsson. Unless, is he a UFA? Quote
Scottysabres Posted February 27, 2017 Report Posted February 27, 2017 Anthony Duclair available from yotes according to Lavoie. Isn't this the same Duclair that played wing for Reinhart? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.