Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

you may have a fake, I don't see anything from Bob

the tweet he is actually referring to was tweated out by Sabres Buzz which is Garth's hockeybuzz twitter I believe

Posted

I'll do 8 for Fowler straight up.

 

I'm not interested in trading Girgensons for a late first-round pick.

 

Question, do you truly view Fowler as a first pair defensemen?  I see someone who is good at picking up the pace and making an inlet pass.  But, he's not a complete defensemen and by virtue we're getting ripped off for a top ten pick.  

Posted

Question, do you truly view Fowler as a first pair defensemen?  I see someone who is good at picking up the pace and making an inlet pass.  But, he's not a complete defensemen and by virtue we're getting ripped off for a top ten pick.  

I personally see him as a solid #3 defender or the shutdown guy with some offense on the top pair but idk he's on the edge of that. If we trade Ennis and Pysyk for him though, I am okay with that. 

I went and got all excited and stuff

You had premature trajaculation, it happens to the best of us.

Posted

Question, do you truly view Fowler as a first pair defensemen?  I see someone who is good at picking up the pace and making an inlet pass.  But, he's not a complete defensemen and by virtue we're getting ripped off for a top ten pick.  

 

I'd rather send (Girgs OR Ennis OR Pysyk) and 38, then use #8 for a future #1 LHD.

Posted

I personally see him as a solid #3 defender or the shutdown guy with some offense on the top pair but idk he's on the edge of that. If we trade Ennis and Pysyk for him though, I am okay with that. 

You had premature trajaculation, it happens to the best of us.

 

No it doesn't. I never get excited. Ever. *serious face*

Posted

I personally see him as a solid #3 defender or the shutdown guy with some offense on the top pair but idk he's on the edge of that. If we trade Ennis and Pysyk for him though, I am okay with that. 

You had premature trajaculation, it happens to the best of us.

 

Exactly someone who you use as the secondary PP QB, and a second pair defensemen. He's not worth #8.  If its for Ennis, Pysyk and other parts....sure all day. 

Posted

Question, do you truly view Fowler as a first pair defensemen?  I see someone who is good at picking up the pace and making an inlet pass.  But, he's not a complete defensemen and by virtue we're getting ripped off for a top ten pick.  

he's very good, 30+ points a year, not too physical.  Bottom line, worst case he's 2nd line D, best case, he's Risto partner, right now he steps in as our best LHD.  You don't need stars I nthe backline to win (ask Pittsburgh), just solid Dmen that don't make mistakes.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...