Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Me too, and I have a feeling that there won't be a buyer for CJ.

 

I'd say it's 90% likely that McGinn gets traded today, Franson and CJ are both around 50%, Foligno and Larsson are around 25% and a bigger name like Zemgus around 10%.

This sounds right to me.  The others I would put a lower % chance then you have.

 

I'm expecting next to nothing to happen today but I've still got the thrill of the unknown to ride out for the next 5 hours or so.

 

Come one Tim!!  #Girgs4Fowler

Posted (edited)

This sounds right to me. The others I would put a lower % chance then you have.

 

I'm expecting next to nothing to happen today but I've still got the thrill of the unknown to ride out for the next 5 hours or so.

 

Come one Tim!! #Girgs4Fowler

I'd expect no Sabres moves reported before ~1PM & then only 2-4 Sabres moves total. Draft day should be far more interesting. Edited by Taro T
Posted

I'd keep Larsson, he's proved his value in my mind.

Yeah.  His value is also infinitely greater to the Sabres than other organ-eye-zations.  Not sure why or when it was decided he's on the trade block. 

Posted

:unsure: Hitting the bottle early?

I wish

 

If you look at Wiercioch Possession Numbers, it shows he has a lot of potential to grow as a D Man. For the price of one of the late thirds considering what is in Rochester and the drop off after Risto and Pysyk, he is worth the gamble

post-3436-0-60347700-1456763315_thumb.png

Posted

Yeah.  His value is also infinitely greater to the Sabres than other organ-eye-zations.  Not sure why or when it was decided he's on the trade block. 

 

I think comes from the fact that the Sabres have, god help me, almost to many centers. O'Reilly, Eichel, Reinhardt, Girgensons. I don't subscribe to that theory, and would rather the Rhinos play on a line together, and keep Girgs on Eichels wing, but I think people see Larsson as a tradeable commodity because of that. Personally, Larry is my ideal version of a third line center.

Posted

I think comes from the fact that the Sabres have, god help me, almost to many centers. O'Reilly, Eichel, Reinhardt, Girgensons. I don't subscribe to that theory, and would rather the Rhinos play on a line together, and keep Girgs on Eichels wing, but I think people see Larsson as a tradeable commodity because of that. Personally, Larry is my ideal version of a third line center.

I don't care if they have 15 centers. Better than the 0 we carried for all too long.

Posted

I think comes from the fact that the Sabres have, god help me, almost to many centers. O'Reilly, Eichel, Reinhardt, Girgensons. I don't subscribe to that theory, and would rather the Rhinos play on a line together, and keep Girgs on Eichels wing, but I think people see Larsson as a tradeable commodity because of that. Personally, Larry is my ideal version of a third line center.

I think it has more to do with him being a Darcy player and someone people viewed as perpetually not likely to make the roster. 

Posted (edited)

I don't think anything is going to happen today unless it is what has come to be referred to as a "hockey trade."

 

(As if they would be trading basketball players.)

 

EDIT:  I mean with respect to the Sabres,

Edited by Eleven
Posted

I don't think anything is going to happen today unless it is what has come to be referred to as a "hockey trade."

 

(As if they would be trading basketball players.)

 

Well, we also hear about "good hockey goals." 

We know what this means, though, yeah? A hockey trade involves some level of each team meeting identified needs based on player-personnel analyses. A non-hockey trade is just dumping a pending UFA for an asset (a draft pick).

Posted

Well, we also hear about "good hockey goals." 

We know what this means, though, yeah? A hockey trade involves some level of each team meeting identified needs based on player-personnel analyses. A non-hockey trade is just dumping a pending UFA for an asset (a draft pick).

 

Ugh yes we do.

Posted

Since every interesting trade was made before today, maybe we should spend our time brainstorming new ideas to replace the "hockey trade" phraseology. I feel like "current roster trade" doesn't have much of a ring to it.

Posted

Since every interesting trade was made before today, maybe we should spend our time brainstorming new ideas to replace the "hockey trade" phraseology. I feel like "current roster trade" doesn't have much of a ring to it.

 

Let's call a trade a trade and a UFA dump, just that.

Posted

I sorta like the goofy stuff in hockey like that -- the redundant use of "hockey" as an adjectival noun. I suspect there are other wrinkles like that in the game. I can't think of any off the top of my head.

Posted

Since every interesting trade was made before today, maybe we should spend our time brainstorming new ideas to replace the "hockey trade" phraseology. I feel like "current roster trade" doesn't have much of a ring to it.

 

How about *our worst contract for your worst contract*?

Posted (edited)

John Shannon ‏@JSportsnet  4m4 minutes ago

 

Told, as of this hour, the Oilers are close to absolutely nothing. #NHLTrade

 

This works on so many levels :lol:

Son of a bitch, Edmonton is going to let me down, aren't they?  :angry: 

 

Oh, I miss the good ol' days.

Right?  I've been up for seven hours already!

7 hours? Jesus man, there is no way I could be doing that.

 

 

Edited by WildCard
Posted

Son of a bitch, Edmonton is going to let me down, aren't they?  :angry: 

 

7 hours? Jesus man, there is no way I could be doing that.

 

 

 

It'll happen to you one day.  Guarantee it.

Posted

I have a feeling a lot of Sabres fans expecting big things today are going to be sorely disappointed. After last year's remake of the whole roster in the few weeks around deadline day, today I'm thinking all we will see is trading away UFA's like Chad Johnson and McGinn for a few picks. Nothing to see here.

 

 

I think that's what most of us expect.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...