North Buffalo Posted June 27, 2015 Report Posted June 27, 2015 I would take Reggie back no problem.Agreed him to. Quote
dejeanneret Posted June 28, 2015 Report Posted June 28, 2015 Final piece to make this one of the most incredible summers in Sabres history is to sign Tarasenko. We get him, game over. Quote
WildCard Posted June 28, 2015 Report Posted June 28, 2015 Final piece to make this one of the most incredible summers in Sabres history is to sign Tarasenko. We get him, game over. If he wants to come here at $2 mil/year, I'm all for it Quote
Rasmus_ Posted June 28, 2015 Report Posted June 28, 2015 Final piece to make this one of the most incredible summers in Sabres history is to sign Tarasenko. We get him, game over. Yeah we all can have pipe dreams :). Personally Saad is in mine. Though Tarasenko would be a dream come true. Any combination of Ennis, Kane, Tarasenko on a line with O'Reilly or Eichel is just wow! Quote
North Buffalo Posted June 28, 2015 Report Posted June 28, 2015 So Saad, Tarasenko, Oduya, and Reggie... wow now that wouldbe a haul and if Murray pulls anywherenear that off I will. hmmm, be very happy :) Quote
GoPre Posted June 28, 2015 Report Posted June 28, 2015 So Saad, Tarasenko, Oduya, and Reggie... wow now that wouldbe a haul and if Murray pulls anywherenear that off I will. hmmm, be very happy :) No chance in h-e-double hockey sticks Buffalo tries for all 4. Hope Murray can land Saad and/or Oduya. Just trying to think realistic. Sekera may possibly have no interest in returning to Buffalo. Tarasenko would cost too much. Honestly want 17 million locked up in 2 players? (Tarasenko and O'Reilly) Quote
Hoss Posted June 28, 2015 Author Report Posted June 28, 2015 Saad isn't happening. He already said he will give them a discount if that's what it takes. He wants to win and knows that Chicago will be a contender for a long time regardless of their cap situation. Tarasenko would maybe be doable if we want to pay him upwards of $9-10M. Quote
GoPre Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 Saad isn't happening. He already said he will give them a discount if that's what it takes. He wants to win and knows that Chicago will be a contender for a long time regardless of their cap situation. Tarasenko would maybe be doable if we want to pay him upwards of $9-10M. Kind of figured that for Saad. A far reach for sure. Would you really want Murray offering Tarasenko 9 to 10M after picking up O'Reilly? We're talking roughly 17M for two players. That's approaching Kane and Toews numbers. It'd seriously jack things up for the young core Buffalo now has. Most certainly would not be able to keep them together in the long term. Quote
Hoss Posted June 29, 2015 Author Report Posted June 29, 2015 (edited) Kind of figured that for Saad. A far reach for sure. Would you really want Murray offering Tarasenko 9 to 10M after picking up O'Reilly? We're talking roughly 17M for two players. That's approaching Kane and Toews numbers. It'd seriously jack things up for the young core Buffalo now has. Most certainly would not be able to keep them together in the long term.I don't really have an opinion on going crazy after Tarasenko one way or the other, but it would take something like that to get it done. Your next 4 first rounders and a huge contract... But boy could you imagine the top nine long-term? Something like: Kane-Eichel-Tarasenko O'Reilly-Reinhart-Ennis Moulson-Girgensons-Bailey/Baptiste Wow. But obviously you've got to pay them, too. I say no. But still. Fun to consider. Won't happen. I do hope somebody offer sheets him, though. Add some intrigue. Edited June 29, 2015 by Hoss Quote
WildCard Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 Kind of figured that for Saad. A far reach for sure. Would you really want Murray offering Tarasenko 9 to 10M after picking up O'Reilly? We're talking roughly 17M for two players. That's approaching Kane and Toews numbers. It'd seriously jack things up for the young core Buffalo now has. Most certainly would not be able to keep them together in the long term. No way I go anywhere near him. Even without having to give up the 4 1st's it would take to sign him, I don't want to start throwing star players together just because they're good. Murray has shown he has a very specific vision for this team and has a mold of a player he wants his guys to fit. I think we're all set for next year on the star front, bring in a LHD UFA and a RW UFA like Williams and we're sitting pretty. Quote
dejeanneret Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 (edited) Wouldn't surprise me if the Sabres used a buyout on Legwand in addition to Hodgson Kind of figured that for Saad. A far reach for sure. Would you really want Murray offering Tarasenko 9 to 10M after picking up O'Reilly? We're talking roughly 17M for two players. That's approaching Kane and Toews numbers. It'd seriously jack things up for the young core Buffalo now has. Most certainly would not be able to keep them together in the long term. From prohockeytalk.com. http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/21/blues-wont-extend-tarasenko-til-after-season/ "The 16th overall pick at the 2010 NHL Entry Draft, it’s conceivable Tarasenko could get a contract similar to what fellow draft mates Taylor Hall got from Edmonton (seven years, $42 million) or Jeff Skinner got from Carolina (six years, $34.35 million)." Sounds right for $6 mil per season to get the deal done. Maybe even $7 mil. But that's it. That's a steal Edited June 29, 2015 by dejeanneret Quote
Hoss Posted June 29, 2015 Author Report Posted June 29, 2015 Wouldn't surprise me if the Sabres used a buyout on Legwand in addition to Hodgson From prohockeytalk.com. http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/21/blues-wont-extend-tarasenko-til-after-season/ "The 16th overall pick at the 2010 NHL Entry Draft, it’s conceivable Tarasenko could get a contract similar to what fellow draft mates Taylor Hall got from Edmonton (seven years, $42 million) or Jeff Skinner got from Carolina (six years, $34.35 million)." Sounds right for $6 mil per season to get the deal done. Maybe even $7 mil. But that's it. That's a steal That gets matched in a heart beat. The $9-10M numbers are being tossed around because it's likely what it would take to get St. Louis to consider not matching. Also, he's better than both of those players were by the time they signed those deals. Quote
LGR4GM Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 No reason for the Sabres to buyout Legwand and Murray already said something about seeing what legwand brought to camp. Guy as 1 year left on a deal and you can easily fit him under the cap, why have a cap hit from him for an additional year. Buying out Legwand makes no sense. Quote
Drunkard Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 No reason for the Sabres to buyout Legwand and Murray already said something about seeing what legwand brought to camp. Guy as 1 year left on a deal and you can easily fit him under the cap, why have a cap hit from him for an additional year. Buying out Legwand makes no sense. I agree. With his deal lasting only one more year they could put him in Rochester and eat most of the cap hit this season and be done with him. I'd rather see Cody McCormick or Larsson on our 4th line than Legwand. Quote
Brawndo Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 The Hoff suprisingly wants to play for a contender http://kuklaskorner.com/hockey/comments/christian-ehrhoff-wants-to-play-for-a-team-with-a-chance-to-win-the-cup?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter Quote
Brawndo Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 Frolik first choice is being reported as the Habs http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/michael-frolik-montreal-canadiens-unrestricted-free-agent-sign-winnipeg-jets-offer-list-report/ Quote
Brawndo Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 @nhlupdate: Per Elliotte Friedman, Stars re-sign Antti Niemi on a 3 year deal at a 4.5M cap hit Quote
Samson's Flow Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 @nhlupdate: Per Elliotte Friedman, Stars re-sign Antti Niemi on a 3 year deal at a 4.5M cap hit Bold move trading for his UFA rights. Gave them an extra week of negotiating. Quote
dudacek Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 Bold move trading for his UFA rights. Gave them an extra week of negotiating. That new avatar with your user name is going to raise a lot of eyebrows with Sabrespace rookies. Quote
Brawndo Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 @reporterchris: The #stars will have $10.4M in cap space tied up in the Lehtonen-Niemi pairing next season. Jim Nill was adamant he wanted to keep both. Not a smart move having 1A and 1B Goalies at these cap hits Quote
Samson's Flow Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 That new avatar with your user name is going to raise a lot of eyebrows with Sabrespace rookies. Good to see you noticed :blush: (since they got rid of Hodgson, I needed to de-cody my profile - this is what I landed on) Quote
Trettioåtta Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 @reporterchris: The #stars will have $10.4M in cap space tied up in the Lehtonen-Niemi pairing next season. Jim Nill was adamant he wanted to keep both. Not a smart move having 1A and 1B Goalies at these cap hits It's not that much more than most teams - who probably clock in at the 8.5 mark. Quote
shrader Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 @reporterchris: The #stars will have $10.4M in cap space tied up in the Lehtonen-Niemi pairing next season. Jim Nill was adamant he wanted to keep both. Not a smart move having 1A and 1B Goalies at these cap hits Nevermind the thought of Lindy actually playing two goalies. Quote
Hoss Posted June 29, 2015 Author Report Posted June 29, 2015 @reporterchris: The #stars will have $10.4M in cap space tied up in the Lehtonen-Niemi pairing next season. Jim Nill was adamant he wanted to keep both. Not a smart move having 1A and 1B Goalies at these cap hits Agreed. Far too much. We sit at $3.5M with Johnson/Lehner. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 Good to see you noticed :blush: (since they got rid of Hodgson, I needed to de-cody my profile - this is what I landed on) By "landed on" do you mean... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.