LGR4GM Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 (edited) well now we know Edited July 1, 2015 by LGR4GM
Johnny DangerFace Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Stoner Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 S'all good, man. Eichel, Reinhart, Girgensons down the middle. Nice start. In a way, it's better in that it's less likely that we'll have the tank thrown in our faces when we win our Cup(s) and cusps.
deluca67 Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Why we tanked. Shart. Victory. 9 more points and the Sabres would have drafted 1st.
Drifter Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 The tank was a success. This is why you need to shoot for last place
Taro T Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 9 more points and the Sabres would have drafted 1st. Only if the pre-lottery number assignments would still have been the same.
LGR4GM Posted April 19, 2015 Author Report Posted April 19, 2015 (edited) Buffalo Sabres @BuffaloSabres 3m3 minutes agoToronto, Ontario Murray: We're disappointed not to get 1st, but we're happy with 2nd. Two franchise-changing guys in this draft Buffalo Sabres @BuffaloSabres 2m2 minutes agoToronto, Ontario Murray: We drafted a center last year. We're going to draft a center again. You need to be strong down the middle Edited April 19, 2015 by LGR4GM
deluca67 Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Only if the pre-lottery number assignments would still have been the same. Why would anything regarding the lottery be different?
LastPommerFan Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Why would anything regarding the lottery be different? butterfly effect.
dudacek Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 (edited) There is nothing I don't like about the way Jack Eichel plays hockey. He will be the best Sabre since PLF. Edited April 19, 2015 by dudacek
deluca67 Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 butterfly effect. Couldn't you then say the Sabres lost the lottery because they "tanked"?
Taro T Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Why would anything regarding the lottery be different? Why would it necessarily be the same? IF the teams are in different order maybe it takes the guy setting up the randomizer 2 extra seconds to get it rolling and now that particular # ends up in the hands of #5. We can't know what happens in that alternate universe where the Sabres weren't the worst NHL team.
LGR4GM Posted April 19, 2015 Author Report Posted April 19, 2015 Couldn't you then say the Sabres lost the lottery because they "tanked"? we are in the land of what ifs so you can honestly say anything. The good news is the tank got us Jack Eichel. Think how Phoenix and Toronto feel right now. Anyone think Murray goes after McDavid? Buffalo Sabres @BuffaloSabres 8m8 minutes ago Murray: We don't want to trade the #2 pick. Not really.
LastPommerFan Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Couldn't you then say the Sabres lost the lottery because they "tanked"? yes
Onceagain Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Anyone notice how much McDavid was blushing when they announced Edmonton - u could feel his stomach drop...will be interested to see how this thing plays out Its too bad the Leafs didn't get McDavid. This has been said ad-nauseum but as annoying as it would have been to see the Leafs win, can you imagine the years of excitement a McDavid-Eichel cross-border rivalry would have brought?
Taro T Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Couldn't you then say the Sabres lost the lottery because they "tanked"? If you want to, you can. But it wouldn't follow logically. Knowing that B is true does not ensure that A is also true for an IF THEN statement.
deluca67 Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 If you want to, you can. But it wouldn't follow logically. Knowing that B is true does not ensure that A is also true for an IF THEN statement. It's easier to just blame the Hockey Gods.
dudacek Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 Buffalo, NY. Home of USA Hockey. This is where we are going. Just need to trade for John Gibson.
Taro T Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 It's easier to just blame the Hockey Gods. Sabres still end up w/ a tremendous hockey player. (Pretty much) Like the old 50's era campaign buttons said: I like Eich (el).
LGR4GM Posted April 19, 2015 Author Report Posted April 19, 2015 Buffalo Sabres Stats @SabresStats 5m5 minutes ago Jack Eichel had 71 points (26G, 45A) and a +51 plus/minus in 40 games for the Boston U. Terriers this year.
Hoss Posted April 19, 2015 Report Posted April 19, 2015 MacTavish just said that he is not trading the first pick.
Recommended Posts