TrueBlueGED Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 Didn't Crosby and Malkin miss large parts of seasons the past few years? And the results were remarkably similar to the team without Bylsma. I'm not sure Bylsma is terrible, but I don't think he adds value to a roster. And I can't attest to whether it's bad drafting or bad coaching...but Pittsburgh hasn't developed a single top-6 forward in a really long time. On a team with a lot of youth that needs to develop, I find that very worrisome.
X. Benedict Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 For theater: what's your (anyone) view on Phil Housley? IMO, no chance.
French Collection Posted April 24, 2015 Report Posted April 24, 2015 I think McLellan may be a good fit. Wasn't afraid to play young guys like Hertl, Karlsson etc... We need a coach who embraces the challenge of a youthful squad and can help them develop and gel as a team. A junior or college guy could relate to them but lacks NHL experience. McLellan would have credibility and could bring in a varied group of assistants. I hope he's on Tim's radar.
Hoss Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I'm still torn on McClellan... He got the least out of a very good group of players. But he does have the look. He puts his hands on his hips, in front of his jacket, with wide eyes as though he cares deeply about what's going on which makes me believe he knows what he's doing.
Doohicksie Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 But he does have the look. He puts his hands on his hips, in front of his jacket, with wide eyes as though he cares deeply about what's going on which makes me believe he knows what he's doing. Clearly top criteria for a coach.
TrueBlueGED Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I'm still torn on McClellan... He got the least out of a very good group of players. But he does have the look. He puts his hands on his hips, in front of his jacket, with wide eyes as though he cares deeply about what's going on which makes me believe he knows what he's doing. I mean, you can argue they were disappointing...but consecutive conference finals appearances isn't exactly getting the least out of his players, especially when one of those teams goes on to win the Cup and the other was a Luongo meltdown away from winning it.
3putt Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I mean, you can argue they were disappointing...but consecutive conference finals appearances isn't exactly getting the least out of his players, especially when one of those teams goes on to win the Cup and the other was a Luongo meltdown away from winning it.That's bad mojo. Don't risk that it follows him.
Hoss Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I mean, you can argue they were disappointing...but consecutive conference finals appearances isn't exactly getting the least out of his players, especially when one of those teams goes on to win the Cup and the other was a Luongo meltdown away from winning it. Was talking more about recent years. One won playoff series in four years... Missed the playoffs this year.
TrueBlueGED Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Was talking more about recent years. One won playoff series in four years... Missed the playoffs this year. I just don't think the roster is that good anymore, especially if you consider it relative to the competition in the West. The blue line in particular is really weak outside of Vlasic IMO. That said, it could just be a situation where the shelf life had expired with that group of players...but I don't think that diminishes how good of a coach he is.
French Collection Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Yeah, Sharks peak was '08-'11. Their D and goaltending are not great. No trade clauses have hurt the rebuild on the fly and fractured the management and player relationships. McLellan would be revitalized on a young, hungry club.
Doohicksie Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Une blague Don't try to impress me with culture because it's useless.
WildCard Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Don't try to impress me with culture because it's useless.
Tondas Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I don't think Babcock is going anywhere, and I don't think he wants to leave. He's smart and is creating leverage to demand more money and power from the wings. Smart play but I don't think the Sabres or any other team, is really in the running to get him.
Doohicksie Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Ooooh... nice! :flirt: I don't think Babcock is going anywhere, and I don't think he wants to leave. He's smart and is creating leverage to demand more money and power from the wings. Smart play but I don't think the Sabres or any other team, is really in the running to get him. I see it differently. I think the Wings see the coach as important but any given coach is not irreplaceable. If Pegula offers too much and Babcock is willing to come to Buffalo, Ilich won't match.
Two or less Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 When Rolston was originally hired for the AHL job, he was hired to be the next coach of the Sabres. I heard that right from the start from people with connections to Rolston. Buffalo was very high on him. Not discrediting you since you have inside info, but for a while we've heard that James Patrick might become the successor after Ruff too.
Marvelo Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Hitchcock might be available if the Blues fail again fo advance out of the first round. (3 years in a row) Poetic justice: Ruff to Dallas, Hitchcock to Buffalo. I'd take Hitch.
X. Benedict Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Hitchcock might be available if the Blues fail again fo advance out of the first round. (3 years in a row) Poetic justice: Ruff to Dallas, Hitchcock to Buffalo. I'd take Hitch. Hitch does a great job of preparing players before the game. He runs a tight system. Inside the game I've never thought he was the best coach. He might actually be a great transitional coach for a year or two. No team should keep Hitch for year 3.
Taro T Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Hitch does a great job of preparing players before the game. He runs a tight system. Inside the game I've never thought he was the best coach. He might actually be a great transitional coach for a year or two. No team should keep Hitch for year 3. I agree w/ what you said, but want absolutely nothing to do w/ him. He is a grade A ######.
Eleven Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I agree w/ what you said, but want absolutely nothing to do w/ him. He is a grade A ######. Ditto.
Eleven Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 (edited) You agree he's a ######? ######? Yeah. Edited April 25, 2015 by Eleven
Stoner Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 ######? Yeah. Holy , he's a lot of things, but he's not a .
Hoss Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 Don't try to impress me with culture because it's useless. Don't worry, I wasn't.
LabattBlue Posted April 25, 2015 Report Posted April 25, 2015 I agree w/ what you said, but want absolutely nothing to do w/ him. He is a grade A ######. Since we have discovered that shithead makes it by the filter, I will assume he is not a "grade A shithead"? :ph34r:
Recommended Posts