beerme1 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Posted January 28, 2015 The title of the thread needs to be changed. Mike Richards nobody. Quote
Andrew Amerk Posted January 28, 2015 Report Posted January 28, 2015 The title of the thread needs to be changed. Mike Richards nobody. Oh snap Quote
nucci Posted January 28, 2015 Report Posted January 28, 2015 The correct answer was Jones. Mike who? Mike Jones. Damn...I'm not very good at this Quote
darksabre Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 The correct answer was Jones. Mike who? Mike Jones. Two eight one three three oh eight oh oh fo Quote
Andrew Amerk Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Two eight one three three oh eight oh oh fo  Hahahaa Quote
Hoss Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Hahahaa For some reason this response reminded me of: Â Quote
dudacek Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Back on topic, Murray's interview this morning made me think he would take Richards in a trade if the Kings made it worth our while. Quote
inkman Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Back on topic, Murray's interview this morning made me think he would take Richards in a trade if the Kings made it worth our while. Â Richards ToffoliForHodgsonStafford Quote
thewookie1 Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Posted January 29, 2015 Richards Toffoli For Hodgson Stafford I'd love that trade Quote
Hoss Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 I'd love that trade So would everybody that likes the Sabres which is why it's not happening. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 During intermission of Kings-Hawks, Mike Milbury said something like "a decision like that can have any number of effects on any number of players." And that was it, no follow-up or anything. Gee Mike, thanks for *that* insight. Quote
Andrew Amerk Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 During intermission of Kings-Hawks, Mike Milbury said something like "a decision like that can have any number of effects on any number of players." And that was it, no follow-up or anything. Gee Mike, thanks for *that* insight. Please tell me that he beat himself with his own shoe afterwards. Quote
shrader Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Richards Toffoli For Hodgson Stafford   I'd love that trade This may be the most unintentionally funny exchange I've ever seen on this board. It's so very toddkaz, don't you think inky? Quote
LGR4GM Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 I heard the Kings have said Toffoli, Pearsson, and Zykov are off the table for anything involving Mike Richards trade. I am sure that isn't really the case but Stafford and Hodgson ain't getting it done. Quote
dudacek Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 A straight Hodgson/Richards deal? I believe Murray's quote was "If you've got a bad contract you'd like to get rid of, you can do a deal with the Kings." Quote
inkman Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 (edited) So would everybody that likes the Sabres which is why it's not happening. Â I don't think it's as far fetched as you think. The deal is really Richard's bad contract plusgood young player to off set taking on contract ForYoung player who needs a change of scenery plusExpiring contract who can contribute for rest of season We can shuffle the pieces around how you like but I think the framework is there Edited January 29, 2015 by inkman Quote
Hoss Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Â I don't think it's as far fetched as you think. The deal is really Richard's bad contract plusgood young player to off set taking on contract ForYoung player who needs a change of scenery plusExpiring contract who can contribute for rest of season We can shuffle the pieces around how you like but I think the framework is there They're not using Toffoli just to dump Richards. Its a bad hockey move and a terrible PR move. Quote
inkman Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 They're not using Toffoli just to dump Richards. Its a bad hockey move and a terrible PR move. Â Like I said, insert whatever young player you want there. I have heard they are willing to include someone to move Richards. You pick. Quote
Eleven Posted January 29, 2015 Report Posted January 29, 2015 Like I said, insert whatever young player you want there. I have heard they are willing to include someone to move Richards. You pick. McNabb and a second. Quote
Hoss Posted February 1, 2015 Report Posted February 1, 2015 Just learned that Mike Richards will not join the Kings on their visit to the White House. Â Is the relationship that sour now? Manchester Monarchs scheduling conflict? Trade? Yikes... Quote
WildCard Posted February 1, 2015 Report Posted February 1, 2015 He was a dick in Philly too, can't imagine his demotion really sat too well with him. I bet he plays lazily in the AHL, pouting the whole time, and when he finally does get another NHL team, he'll have 1-2 good to great seasons, and then fall off again. Quote
inkman Posted February 1, 2015 Report Posted February 1, 2015 He was a dick in Philly too, can't imagine his demotion really sat too well with him. I bet he plays lazily in the AHL, pouting the whole time, and when he finally does get another NHL team, he'll have 1-2 good to great seasons, and then fall off again. Not that I agree with your assessment, but if I knew I could get 2 PPG seasons out of him, I'd trade almost anything outside of this year's top pick to get him. Quote
nfreeman Posted February 1, 2015 Report Posted February 1, 2015 Â I don't think it's as far fetched as you think. The deal is really Richard's bad contract plusgood young player to off set taking on contract ForYoung player who needs a change of scenery plusExpiring contract who can contribute for rest of season We can shuffle the pieces around how you like but I think the framework is there Leaving aside the Wookie nature of that trade proposal, what's with the random capital letters and lack of periods? Quote
Hoss Posted February 1, 2015 Report Posted February 1, 2015 Not that I agree with your assessment, but if I knew I could get 2 PPG seasons out of him, I'd trade almost anything outside of this year's top pick to get him. No way he has any PPG seasons in him... Especially considering he hasn't been a PPG player since 2009. Quote
Andrew Amerk Posted February 1, 2015 Report Posted February 1, 2015 No way he has any PPG seasons in him... Especially considering he hasn't been a PPG player since 2009. He's clearly not the same player since his last concussion. Anyone who has the had concussions, like I have, would recognize this. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.