Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Best I can tell, there was no good reason to publish the name of the guy's employer.

 

There were reasons to do so but they were dishonorable.

 

And I say that as someone who has just about zero sympathy for that guy.

Don't mistake being opposed to the Snooze's action as being in favor of the moron.

Posted

It was and they mostly are. But that doesn't make the Snooze's decision any less prickish.

 

Playing the "let's #### this guy over because we can" game is pretty petty. And let's face it, putting where he worked out there is playing that game.

 

Fair.

Posted

You don't go assuming you think you know what somebody implied, and then go on to play the race card based on your assumptions. That's desperation. This happens more often in football than hockey, it's undeniable. Using your logic, anybody that addresses that fact is making it a racial issue. You can come to your own conclusions, but don't make my conclusion and then play the race card. I said 'football players', you made it racial. I know the race of exactly ONE person involved in this situation. 

 

Those that defend race are usually the first to play the race card. 

 

Exactly. Everyone knows hockey players are too busy sexually assaulting people to be bothered with silly bar fights. They prefer their fisticuffs on the ice anyway.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...