Jump to content

2015-16 roster


Hoss

Recommended Posts

Alright, so many threads shift to this discussion. So we might as well start this up now.

 

Who do you think should be on the roster? Shouldn't? Will? Won't be?

 

Should be interesting to see this evolve as the season goes on. Some projected lineups will be fun once some moves happen later in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ennis - Grigorenko - Armia

Moulson - Reinhart - (2015 Draftee)

Hodgson - Girgensons - Gionta

Foligno - Larsson - Deslauriers

 

 

Gorges - Myers

Zadorov - Ristolainen

McCabe - Pysyk

 

 

Extra Forwards - Schaller, McCormick

7th D = Mike Weber

 

 

Gone

Flynn (RFA)

Mitchell (UFA)

Benoit (UFA)

Meszaros (UFA)

Stafford (UFA)

Stewart (UFA)

Kaleta (UFA)

Edited by Numark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideal lineup, at least to start the season. Players with a (1) before them indicate staying based on performance.

 

Moulson - Ennis - Girgensons

Hodgson - 2015 1st - Gionta

(1)Grigorenko - (1) Samson - (1) Armia

(1) Carrier - Larsson - Foligno

 

Myers - Georges

 

Risto - Zadorov

 

Pysyk - McCabe

 

Neuvirth

 

Makarov/Hackett

Edited by WildCard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not accounting for trades or free agents here's my guess:

 

Moulson Eichel Hodgson

 

Ennis Grigorenko Armia

 

Foligno Girgensons Gionta

 

Deslauriers McCormick Kaleta

 

Extra: Larsson

 

Gorges Myers

 

Zadarov Ristolainen

 

Weber Psysk

 

Extra: McCabe

 

Neuvirth

 

Makarov

 

Reinhart goes to the AHL to develop for next season.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts constantly evolving, probably will expect about 20 different lineups by the time October actually gets here. If Zadorov plays on the big club the D could be extremely young w/out a puck moving vet brought in via trade or free agency. I'll put McCabe there w/ Pysyk, but can't really see a way that 4 of the 6 are in their 2nd year or less. I expect a vet to be brought in, but no feel for whether he'd arrive via trade or FA.

 

If Stewart goes, they almost have to bring in a FA RW. So for this, assuming he's back / another FA.

 

Because next year will be another down year, though close to playoffs, I could see them going w/ Neuvirth as the starter, but more expect him to be backing up someone brought in during the off-season.

 

Moulson - McEichel - Stewart/FA

Ennis - Grigorenko - Armia

Hodgson - Girgensons - Gionta

Deslauriers - Larsson- McCormick

 

Gorges - Myers

Zadorov/FA - Ristolainen

McCabe - Pysyk

 

???

Neuvirth

 

Spares:Weber, Flynn, Foligno (realistically Weber will probably be the only spare of the 3. Carrier could be in the mix bumping someone else to spare duty.)

 

Looking at this there have to be a couple of trades in the works as well.

 

Also, kind of ironic that Hodgson wanted out of Van-city because hevdidn't want to be a 3rd line C. W/ this lineip, he gets his wish. He's not 3rd line C, he's 3rd line wing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My quick thoughts (if we get a top 2 pick):

 

Moulson-2015 draftee-(trade)

Girgensons-Reinhart-Armia

Ennis-Grigorenko-Gionta

Foligno-Larsson-Deslauriers

 

Myers-Gorges

Risto-Zadorov

Pysyk-McCabe

 

Neuvirth-(FA/trade vet)

I'm hoping Gionta and Ennis are gone in lieu of better players. Actual top 6 forwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping Gionta and Ennis are gone in lieu of better players. Actual top 6 forwards.

 

Ennis can have a long-term place on this team (at wing). He can also be a piece of a big trade. Either way I think he'll have a positive impact on this team going forward.

Edited by Tankalicious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not accounting for trades or free agents here's my guess:

 

Moulson Eichel Hodgson

 

Ennis Grigorenko Armia

 

Foligno Girgensons Gionta

 

Deslauriers McCormick Kaleta

 

Extra: Larsson

 

Gorges Myers

 

Zadarov Ristolainen

 

Weber Psysk

 

Extra: McCabe

 

Neuvirth

 

Makarov

 

Reinhart goes to the AHL to develop for next season.

 

I like the idea of Reinhart going to the AHL for half, if not all, of next season. I don't see how it would hurt him in the long run, and would only help him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, kind of ironic that Hodgson wanted out of Van-city because hevdidn't want to be a 3rd line C. W/ this lineip, he gets his wish. He's not 3rd line C, he's 3rd line wing.

 

He's not on my team at all if I have a say so in the matter. As bad as it is here, he is not worthy of ######. Get him outta here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ennis can have a long-term place on this team (at wing). He can also be a piece of a big trade. Either way I think he'll have a positive impact on this team going forward.

Not with a $4.6 mil cap hit for this season and the next four. His inability to finish consistently is glaring. Any thoughts that he may be a "top 6" have to be considered wishful thinking at this point. Ennis is a third/fourth line winger, maybe a second unit power play winger.

 

When this franchise turns the corner I just don't see a place for an inconsistent 5' 9" third line winger. He's 25 and in his 5th NHL season, I certainly expect more from Ennis than what he is producing at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ennis - Grigorenko - Armia

Moulson - Reinhart - (2015 Draftee)

Hodgson - Girgensons - Gionta

Foligno - Larsson - Deslauriers

 

 

Gorges - Myers

Zadorov - Ristolainen

McCabe - Pysyk

 

 

Extra Forwards - Schaller, McCormick

7th D = Mike Weber

 

 

Gone

Flynn (RFA)

Mitchell (UFA)

Benoit (UFA)

Meszaros (UFA)

Stafford (UFA)

Stewart (UFA)

Kaleta (UFA)

 

Have you figured out the cap level of this line-up? just wondering if you would hit the floor? Plus im going to say that Myers gets traded this year for a winger who will play for the Sabres next year.

Edited by Crusader1969
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Reinhart isn't on the team next season then it'd be extremely disappointing...

I agree

What will be really interesting is how they are going to accommodate Grigorenko and Reinhart assuming we get a McEichel.

That's the main reason why I think either Ennis or Hodgson — or maybe both — will be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree

What will be really interesting is how they are going to accommodate Grigorenko and Reinhart assuming we get a McEichel.

That's the main reason why I think either Ennis or Hodgson — or maybe both — will be gone.

At some point in the coming years, some of the NHL ready prospects are going to have to be traded for NHL experienced players. If not, take a good look at Edmonton for the last several years, and how they continue to tread water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point in the coming years, some of the NHL ready prospects are going to have to be traded for NHL experienced players. If not, take a good look at Edmonton for the last several years, and how they continue to tread water.

 

I agree.

 

There is no way to predict what the next couple years' roster will look like. I cannot fathom 5 or 6 rooks and 2nd year players on the squad at one time. Several kids that we all are drooling over are going to get moved, or we end up like Edmonton.

Edited by weave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...