Doohicksie Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 A couple thoughts...first, the Chicago game showed exactly why the tank is necessary because it shows the difference one great player can make. The Hawks were dead and trailing 3-2 with two minutes left and Toews scores twice?! Amazing. Remember Captain Clutch? Not the same level of talent or longevity, but geez Drury could bring it in the big situations.
Hoss Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 I decided to remove myself from here for a few days... Lurked but didn't post. Needed to calm myself a bit because I was going insane. Really glad to be in the position we're in now... Not sold that this thing is over, but I wouldn't be sold that Buffalo was going to win the cup even up 5 with ten minutes to go in Game 7 either. One more and it's over. Let's get it done Monday so we can go into the last back-to-back pulling for the "good guys" again. Really hoping Saturday is a no-worry game where the crowd can really show our players that we still love them and this team. Also... Decided to do a new type of standings to get through the last week of the regular season: lottery standings. Current lottery standings through games played 4/4 (using actual NHL standings)Team GP PTS ROW PLP CL%Buffalo 79 52 14 1-2 20.0Arizona 79 56 19 1-3 13.5Edmonton 79 59 18 2-3 11.5Toronto 79 65 25 4-5 9.5Carolina 78 69 24 4-6 8.5 New Jersey 79 77 27 5-8 7.5 Philadelphia 79 82 29 6-12 6.5 Columbus 78 82 31 6-12 6.0 Colorado 79 84 27 7-12 5.0 Dallas 79 86 34 7-OUT 3.5 Florida 79 87 28 7-14 3.0 San Jose 79 87 35 7-OUT 2.5 Winnipeg 78 92 33 10-OUT 2.0 Ottawa 78 92 34 10-OUT 1.0 Los Angeles 78 92 37 10-OUT N/A Calgary 79 93 39 13-OUT N/A Boston 79 95 37 13-OUT N/A Pittsburgh 79 95 38 13-OUT N/A Vancouver 79 95 40 13-OUT N/A Detroit 78 95 37 13-OUT N/A Minnesota 78 96 40 13-OUT N/A Washington 79 97 38 13-OUT N/A NY Islanders 79 98 39 13-OUT N/A PLP - Possible lottery positions (the numbers represent the lottery positions they could possibly finish) CL& - Current lottery percentage
TrueBlueGED Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 I decided to remove myself from here for a few days... Lurked but didn't post. Needed to calm myself a bit because I was going insane. Really glad to be in the position we're in now... Not sold that this thing is over, but I wouldn't be sold that Buffalo was going to win the cup even up 5 with ten minutes to go in Game 7 either. One more and it's over. Let's get it done Monday so we can go into the last back-to-back pulling for the "good guys" again. Really hoping Saturday is a no-worry game where the crowd can really show our players that we still love them and this team. I definitely thought you jumped :p
Neo Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 For my knowledgable friends. Should the draft wind its way down to say, the final two teams, what are the adjusted odds that 30 picks first? It's 20% at the first draw. I don't know the replacement mechanism, if any. It may be as simple as 20/33.5.
Hoss Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 For my knowledgable friends. Should the draft wind its way down to say, the final two teams, what are the adjusted odds that 30 picks first? It's 20% at the first draw. I don't know the replacement mechanism, if any. It may be as simple as 20/33.5. Somewhere near 60% that the last place team got it and near 40% for the second to last.
kas23 Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 I thought I read somewhere that the last place team has never lost the lottery 2 years in a row. So, if we lose the top pick again (assuming we finish last), the conspiracy theories can start.
#freejame Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 (edited) I thought I read somewhere that the last place team has never lost the lottery 2 years in a row. So, if we lose the top pick again (assuming we finish last), the conspiracy theories can start. I posted something about that about a month ago, I'll see if I can find that link again. Edit: Here's the link to the article, it's only happened once that the same team lost the lottery two years in a row (though they still picked first) http://www2.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=18342 Edited April 6, 2015 by IrwinNelson
Hoss Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 (edited) I thought I read somewhere that the last place team has never lost the lottery 2 years in a row. So, if we lose the top pick again (assuming we finish last), the conspiracy theories can start. The same team has only finished last in consecutive years three times since the lottery was implemented in 1995 (the 94-96 Senators, the 97-99 Lightning and the 09-11 Oilers). The Senators picked first both times they were last -- once because LA won the lottery but could only move up four spots and once because they won the lottery. The Lightning picked first in 98 despite losing the lottery (they had a trade that allowed them to swap spots) and won the lottery in 99 but had traded that pick away. The Oilers picked first both times -- once because they won the lottery and the other because New Jersey won but could only move up four spots. Hardly fuel for the conspiracy theorists if Buffalo doesn't win the lottery. Small sample size and a "dumb-luck" type of event that makes it hard to say what should and shouldn't happen. Especially considering the odds have changed. Edited April 5, 2015 by Tank
carpandean Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) For my knowledgable friends. Should the draft wind its way down to say, the final two teams, what are the adjusted odds that 30 picks first? It's 20% at the first draw. I don't know the replacement mechanism, if any. It may be as simple as 20/33.5. Well, there isn't any replacement, at all, because they pick one number and that's it. If they reveal teams down through #3 and nobody has moved, then the conditional probability of the 30th team winning, given that the first 17th-28th did not is, as you guessed, 0.2/0.35. Technically, though, the winning team has already been determined, so there is no longer any probability involved (no more random event, just an unknown constant.) As for the previous history of 30th place teams, two things have changed in recent years that make that information even less relevant: 1) the probability of the 30th team picking first has been reduced from 25% to 20% 2) the 4-spot limit was eliminated The chance of the 30th team picking first used to 48.2%, now it's 20%. Edited April 6, 2015 by carpandean
Hoss Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 Current lottery standings through games played 4/5 (using actual NHL standings)Team GP PTS ROW PLP CL%Buffalo 79 52 14 1-2 20.0Arizona 79 56 19 1-3 13.5Edmonton 79 59 18 2-3 11.5Toronto 80 67 25 4-5 9.5Carolina 78 69 24 4-6 8.5 New Jersey 79 77 27 5-8 7.5 Philadelphia 79 82 29 6-12 6.5 Columbus 78 82 31 6-12 6.0 Colorado 79 84 27 7-12 5.0 Dallas 79 86 34 7-OUT 3.5 Florida 80 87 28 7-14 3.0 San Jose 79 87 35 7-OUT 2.5 Winnipeg 78 92 33 10-OUT 2.0 Ottawa 79 93 34 10-OUT 1.0 Los Angeles 78 92 37 10-OUT N/A Calgary 79 93 39 13-OUT N/A Boston 79 95 37 13-OUT N/A Detroit 79 95 37 13-OUT N/A Pittsburgh 79 95 38 13-OUT N/A Vancouver 79 95 40 13-OUT N/A Minnesota 78 96 40 13-OUT N/A NY Islanders 79 98 39 13-OUT N/A PLP - Possible lottery positions (the numbers represent the lottery positions they could possibly finish) CL& - Current lottery percentage Washington clinched and was removed tonight. Minnesota can clinch and be removed from the list tomorrow with a regulation win.
3putt Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 I'll accept this nomination and I nominate, Eleven, Callaway and 3putt. You must also kiss it once raised over your head. I accept and nominate Neuvirth's Glove, Dudacek and Claude V
calti Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 if #30 doesn't win the lottery's 1st pick...then they sure as heck want it to be #29 which wins it. Then the odds for the #2 would be slightly over 50% at that point. Correct me if im mistaken.
Hoss Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 if #30 doesn't win the lottery's 1st pick...then they sure as heck want it to be #29 which wins it. Then the odds for the #2 would be slightly over 50% at that point. Correct me if im mistaken. I'm not sure what you're getting at. This year's last place team has a 100% shot at second if they don't get the first pick.
calti Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) I'm not sure what you're getting at. This year's last place team has a 100% shot at second if they don't get the first pick.oops......I blame it on jet lag---I think its more like #29 wants #30 to win rather than someone below them--increasing its odds for eichel to slightly over 50% Edited April 6, 2015 by calti
Hoss Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 oops......I blame it on jet lag---I think its more like #29 wants #30 to win rather than someone below them--increasing its odds for eichel to slightly over 50% Still lost haha. If 30 wins then 29 gets 2 guaranteed.
WildCard Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 oops......I blame it on jet lag---I think its more like #29 wants #30 to win rather than someone below them--increasing its odds for eichel to slightly over 50% Still lost haha. If 30 wins then 29 gets 2 guaranteed. You're thinking about it from 30's perspective I think, and he's thinking about it from 29's. If the Sabres were in 29th, we would want the 30th place team to win if we didn't, so we could still pick second like you said. So if your 29th, you have 30th+29th %'s at winning McEichel
Hoss Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 The way it's worded seems to be that he's saying that if 30 wins the lottery then 29's odds at 2 goes a little over 50%. That's how I'm reading it at least.
Thorner Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 I posted something about that about a month ago, I'll see if I can find that link again. Edit: Here's the link to the article, it's only happened once that the worst team two years in a row didn't draft first at least once. http://www2.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=18342 Not sure I follow. Looking at the list, the last place team lost the lottery and didn't pick first 3 years in a row from 2012-14. And from 2000-2002, three years, last place lost the lottery and did not draft first. (Those particular 3 years are bookended with not-last-place teams getting first pick as well, but it's because they traded the pick: 1999 - Tampa finished last, got first pick, and traded it, 2003 - Carolina finished last, got first pick and traded it). But that's still two blocks where last place didn't pick first for multiple years in a row.
carpandean Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) Not sure I follow. Looking at the list, the last place team lost the lottery and didn't pick first 3 years in a row from 2012-14. And from 2000-2002, three years, last place lost the lottery and did not draft first. (Those particular 3 years are bookended with not-last-place teams getting first pick as well, but it's because they traded the pick: 1999 - Tampa finished last, got first pick, and traded it, 2003 - Carolina finished last, got first pick and traded it). But that's still two blocks where last place didn't pick first for multiple years in a row. I think that he's saying that when the same team has been the worst team two years in a row, that team has never lost the first pick both years. There were three such cases, two drafted first once and the other drafted first both times. Of course, the odds are the odds, completely unaffected by previous results. Under the old system, there was a 73.2% chance that such a team would pick first at least once. Under the current system, there is only a 36% chance that they would. However, that's before the two lotteries have occurred. Now that the first one happened, if they Sabres hold on to 30th, there's just a 20% chance that they draft first in at least one (obviously, only one) of those successive years. Edited April 6, 2015 by carpandean
Taro T Posted April 6, 2015 Author Report Posted April 6, 2015 Current standings through games played 4/5. Team GP L W OT PT MPP PR RPTC M# CPM Buffalo 79 49 22 8 106 112 6 3 2 19.7 Arizona 79 47 24 8 102 108 6 7 11 13.4 Edmonton 79 43 23 13 99 105 6 -- 11.7 Toronto 80 43 30 7 93 97 4 -- 9.5 Carolina 78 38 29 11 87 95 8 -- 8.4 Columbus 78 35 39 4 74 84 8 -- 6.1 CPM per sportsclubstats.com and lottery weighting - last updated 3/28 in PM 3 teams in action. BJ's visit the Rags. Sabres host Candy Canes looking to lock up the trophy. 2 points turns the trick.
Thorner Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) I think that he's saying that when the same team has been the worst team two years in a row, that team has never lost the first pick both years. There were three such cases, two drafted first once and the other drafted first both times. Of course, the odds are the odds, completely unaffected by previous results. Under the old system, there was a 73.2% chance that such a team would pick first at least once. Under the current system, there is only a 36% chance that they would. However, that's before the two lotteries have occurred. Now that the first one happened, if they Sabres hold on to 30th, there's just a 20% chance that they draft first in at least one (obviously, only one) of those successive years. Fair enough, that makes more sense. I guess I was just thrown off by the "it's only happened once" bit. In regards to the same team finishing last twice in a row, it's actually like you said, it has never happened that that team fails to draft first both times. Edit: But yeah, obviously all this has no actual bearing on the lottery odds this year. Edited April 6, 2015 by Thorny
Hoss Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 I posted something about that about a month ago, I'll see if I can find that link again. Edit: Here's the link to the article, it's only happened once that the worst team two years in a row didn't draft first at least once. http://www2.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=18342 It's never happened (looking at your link)
#freejame Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 It's never happened (looking at your link) You're right, Tampa lost twice, but since you could only move up four at the time, picked first.
X. Benedict Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) These are the times that try men's souls. The summer player and the sunshine fan, in this crisis cannot shirk from service. The Shart, like Hell, is not easily conquered. - Thomas "I've watched this Season in" Paine it. I'm taking one for the team. But why did it have to be Carolina. - anonymous Let's make this the last night of our ignominious fraternity. Let's clench the Shart, drink our Champagne, and like ranch-hands and rodeo cowboys meeting in line at Tim Hortons, forever henceforth remain faithful to the wives we've strayed from even if Mike Harrington continues to brand us with the Scarlet Sabres logo and shout "Adultery" while we are ordering our Timbits across the crowded cafe bake shop. Like Hester Prynne let us forever keep our Dignity while holding our baby McEichel close to our teet and experiencing the joy of letting our little one suckle inside the warmth of our rendered goat head and slug garments. We've dreamed in our waking moments brothers, and we've walked in our sleep. May we clench tonight in this 6 bagger. May we clench and move forward as we forgive our younger selves for this night of the Carrion Cane. Edited April 6, 2015 by X. Benedict
Hoss Posted April 6, 2015 Report Posted April 6, 2015 You're right, Tampa lost twice, but since you could only move up four at the time, picked first. Ah. While I noticed that I didn't quite think of that technically fitting since really the conversation should be about losing the lottery two consecutive times.
Recommended Posts