Derrico Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 So did we just give up our number one dman, number three forward (based on points) and starting goalie today? I know we got back a good dman as well but this should be nice for the chl stretch run.
shrader Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 So did we just give up our number one dman, number three forward (based on points) and starting goalie today? I know we got back a good dman as well but this should be nice for the chl stretch run. How does this work in CHL language? Was it our worst defenseman, a 4th line forward, and our backup goalie?
Derrico Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 How does this work in CHL language? Was it our worst defenseman, a 4th line forward, and our backup goalie? Ya that seems more appropriate.
Hoss Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 Martin Hanzal out for the season in Arizona.
shrader Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 That Hanzal, he's not so hot right now.
biodork Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 That Hanzal, he's not so hot right now. :lol:
TrueBlueGED Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 Martin Hanzal out for the season in Arizona. It's a shame Arizona is tanking because I'd love to acquire another useful player who won't be useful until next year.
qwksndmonster Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 Martin Hanzal out for the season in Arizona. Trade for him, GMTM! It's a shame Arizona is tanking because I'd love to acquire another useful player who won't be useful until next year. Dammit foiled.
darksabre Posted February 12, 2015 Report Posted February 12, 2015 That Hanzal, he's not so hot right now. Well played.
Hoss Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 (edited) Ryan Nugent-Hopkins ties it up with :25 to go by putting it behind Tokarski and into his own net! Overtime. Edited February 13, 2015 by Tank
WildCard Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Ryan Nugent-Hopkins ties it up with :25 to go by putting it behind Tokarski and into his own net! Overtime. So now Edmonton gets the backups too eh? :beer:
Hoss Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Anton Lander scores it to lose! So now Edmonton gets the backups too eh? :beer: I'm sure they've gotten them all season.
WildCard Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Huge loss for Edmonton; to fall in the dying seconds and then in OT to a CHL bottom-feeder in Montreal, awesome night
CallawaySabres Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Who thought the 2nd half of the season could be so exciting
bob_sauve28 Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Murray drops the mic right in front of MacTavish. Ha ha ha!!
calti Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 the sabres..the far sup..i mean inferior franchise in buffalo getting it done.
beerme1 Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Dedicate all the threads you want to Regier's centers. But spell it that way, without the apostrophe between the "center" and the "s," or deal with my wrath. There already is a thread dedicated to Ruff's system. It was a good thread! I look into this fun house mirror thread every so often and I just want to tell you something. You my friend are lucky you schooled him on the center thing. When I started reading it I was expect read it should be spelled centre's!
Taro T Posted February 13, 2015 Author Report Posted February 13, 2015 Current standings through games played 2/12. Team GP L W OT PT MPP PR RPTC Buffalo 55 36 16 3 75 129 54 49 Edmonton 56 31 16 9 71 123 52 53 Arizona 55 28 20 7 63 117 54 61 Toronto 56 29 23 4 62 114 52 62 Carolina 53 27 19 7 61 119 58 63 New Jersey 54 24 21 9 57 113 56 67 Columbus 52 26 23 3 55 115 60 71 Philadelphia 54 22 23 9 53 109 56 69 MPP = Maximum Possible Points PR = Points Remaining RPTC = Remaining Points needed to Clinch 1st Place (will necessarily be > than PR for all (w/ likely exception of team currently in 1st)) BJ's, Joisey, & Desert Dogs in action tonight.
Hoss Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 I don't think the remaining points to clinch first is accurate. To clinch first for anybody other than the Sabres you would need to clinch more points than they could possibly get which is 130. So the Oilers would need 59 to get there. Everybody but Columbus and Philly are set up to have their clinching total at 124. 124 clinches it over Edmonton, but not Buffalo. So that'll need to be adjusted. Should be: Edmonton - 59 Arizona - 67 Toronto - 68 Carolina - 69 New Jersey - 73 Columbus - 75 Philly - 77
K8prisoner Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 (edited) It could be fun if Ed starts winning and we get a cushion ...so we can watch the impossible, as Bogosian starts leading the team with the play and ethic of a winner (being very close to home) well before kane is even in the lockeroom . Go oilers ( they looked great .. Emerging as a team with talent and a backbone on the road.. A cushion is at least ten points.. 6 is nothing. . But better than 4. Edited February 13, 2015 by K8prisoner
WildCard Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 It could be fun if Ed starts winning and we get a cushion so we can watch the impossible as Bogosian starts leading the team with the play and ethic of a winner (being very close to home) well before kane is even in the lockeroom . Go oilers ( they looked great .. Emerging as a team with talent and a backbone on the road.. A cushion is at least ten points.. 6 is nothing. . But better than 4. So we're sittin on a throw pillow then with 6 points?
K8prisoner Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 I'm nervous .. Look at the difference Roy and the subtraction of three good players ,we would want, ..have done for them.. 0 -10 to 5-5 and on the road .. Out shooting their opponents .
Taro T Posted February 13, 2015 Author Report Posted February 13, 2015 I don't think the remaining points to clinch first is accurate. To clinch first for anybody other than the Sabres you would need to clinch more points than they could possibly get which is 130. So the Oilers would need 59 to get there. Everybody but Columbus and Philly are set up to have their clinching total at 124. 124 clinches it over Edmonton, but not Buffalo. So that'll need to be adjusted. Should be: Edmonton - 59 Arizona - 67 Toronto - 68 Carolina - 69 New Jersey - 73 Columbus - 75 Philly - 77 I don't think the remaining points to clinch first is accurate. To clinch first for anybody other than the Sabres you would need to clinch more points than they could possibly get which is 130. So the Oilers would need 59 to get there. Everybody but Columbus and Philly are set up to have their clinching total at 124. 124 clinches it over Edmonton, but not Buffalo. So that'll need to be adjusted. Should be: Edmonton - 59 Arizona - 67 Toronto - 68 Carolina - 69 New Jersey - 73 Columbus - 75 Philly - 77 No. To clinch, you have to get more than the 2nd team (less than the 29th NHL squad) gets. So, the team in 1st needs one more than 2nd place can get (technically, because Buffalo took 2 in both games against the Eulers and hold the tiebreaker, they just need to finish even w/ them, but we don't want to worry about tie breakers, win it outright) and the 2nd place team also needs 1 more than they can get (aka, they CAN'T clinch as they can't get there from here). We could make it more complicated, but anybody behind 2nd place has to get ahead of THAT to clinch; that they'll also need help from the current 1st place team becomes immaterial as they CAN'T get ahead of #2 w/ what remains available to them. Once they climb to #2, they need exactly 1 more point than is available to clinch.
Recommended Posts