Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

@LaurenBrill4

Source tells me Sabres are still working on making a deal with Moulson.

 

She hit on Gionta.

 

Probably should rephrase that as she hit on the Gionta Signing.

Posted (edited)

 

TM still thinks he should have got a first for him at the deadline, so he is going to try it again this year.

 

100 points to you

Edited by Glass Case Of Emotion
Posted

 

Saw a tweet from Lauren Brill saying Sabres are talking to Moulson now.

Won't score a ton, but a 1st line of Moulson-Reinhart-Gionta should score a reasonable amount and be entertaining to watch.

Posted

If we sign Moulson we're going to be too good next year.

 

He was also on the team last year, essentially we've swapped Ott for Gionta, Ehrhoff for Gorges, and Nieuvirth for Miller

 

not much better if at all.

Posted

Moulson 5yrs 25mil :flirt:

 

Yay! My favorite Sabre returns. And, further proof that Murray has balls of steel. He trades away his guys at the deadline for significant assets. Then re-signs them as UFAs in the summer... AND keeps the assets he got for them. I have a man crush on Murray.

Posted

please tell me you are kidding :sick:

 

Why ?

 

We need solid vets that can bring along the young guns, and we have to hit the cap floor. Over paying for a high quality player like Moulson who genuinely wants to help Buffalo with our rebuild is money very well spent

Posted

 

 

Why ?

 

We need solid vets that can bring along the young guns, and we have to hit the cap floor. Over paying for a high quality player like Moulson who genuinely wants to help Buffalo with our rebuild is money very well spent

Plus we still need to get to the floor and that eats a nice chunk of it.

Posted

 

 

Why ?

 

We need solid vets that can bring along the young guns, and we have to hit the cap floor. Over paying for a high quality player like Moulson who genuinely wants to help Buffalo with our rebuild is money very well spent

Term is longer than I'd've preferred, but he apparently had a lot of suitors. This is only contract that might look bad when the kids are starting to gel. TM should be able to work w/ only 1 (not horribly) bad contract.

Posted

I'm fine with Moulson getting 5M, based on other contracts he fits between the bloated end (Pouliot) and the high guys like Vanek etcetera. I'd rather watch Moulson than having to have engorged in the Pouliot's and other trash in the world. Now get Otter!

Posted

Why ?

 

We need solid vets that can bring along the young guns, and we have to hit the cap floor. Over paying for a high quality player like Moulson who genuinely wants to help Buffalo with our rebuild is money very well spent

 

Because he's almost 31 years old, on the downside of his career, will be significantly diminished as a player by the time we are good and will want him to be, but he will still be taking up 5 mil of cap space, and he doesn't do anything in particular that I want the young guys to emulate.

 

Term is longer than I'd've preferred, but he apparently had a lot of suitors. This is only contract that might look bad when the kids are starting to gel. TM should be able to work w/ only 1 (not horribly) bad contract.

 

I would rather pay him 3 years, 21 mil than 5x5.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...