Hoss Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 (edited) Historically, what is the hawks record in games 5,6, and 7 ? Mhm. One stat I'd like to see is what is the game seven record of teams that just won game give and six. LA themselves came back from 3-1 this postseason. They had less than a ten percent chance (even lower considering it was from a 3-0 deficit). Edited June 1, 2014 by Tankalicious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jsixspd Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 (edited) Ok, here are the two team's game 7 stats http://www.whowins.c...s/nhl2014n.html "After Game 6: The Chicago Blackhawks visited and outscored the Los Angeles Kings 4-goals-3 to tie best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL playoff series 1234 at 3-games-all. When tied 3-games-all in a best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL playoff series, the Chicago Blackhawks have a Game 7 record of 6-5 (5-2 on home ice, with an active four-Game 7 winning streak at home), while the Los Angeles Kings have a Game 7 record of 6-4 (4-3 on road ice). The Chicago Blackhawks thus seek to achieve a WLLLWWW win order for a series victory for the second consecutive playoff year, having also done so against the Detroit Red Wings in 2013. The Los Angeles Kings seek to join the 2011 NHL Boston Bruins and the 1988 NBA Los Angeles Lakers as the only MLB/NBA/NHL teams to win three Game 7s in the same playoff season. The Chicago Blackhawks hope to make the Los Angeles Kings become the only MLB/NBA/NHL team to lose three consecutive games in three consecutive best-of-7 playoff series in the same playoff season." So the Blackhawks are .550 winning% in Game 7s, and the Kings are .600 winning % in game 7. When Game 7 is played on the road, LA = .570% WP, and when the Blackhawks play at home, .714 WP% Hawks definitely do better in Game 7s at home, then vs on the road. LA does slightly worse on the road than at home in game 7. Edited June 1, 2014 by Jsixspd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 What Blackhawks/Kings teams did twenty years ago won't have an impact tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyldnwoody44 Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 I wish LA would win tonight however after playing 20 games already, and giving Chicago an in at home tonight, I just don't see any other outcome than a Hawks win.... They have the momentum and seem to pull it out when it really matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 I'm pulling for the Blackhawks. I love that team. Another cup makes them a near dynasty which hasn't happened in a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaLaLaFontaine Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 I'm pulling for the Blackhawks. I love that team. Another cup makes them a near dynasty which hasn't happened in a long time. Please do not burn me for the following comment. If Chicago wins the third cup, I believe Kane would have won everything in Chicago and may be open to choose the hard way with the small chance to become a legend in his hometown by bringing the Cup home. Why win a fourth cup in Chicago, when clearly the bigger and much more difficult ( maybe impossible) quest would be to win the cup with Buffalo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 Please do not burn me for the following comment. If Chicago wins the third cup, I believe Kane would have won everything in Chicago and may be open to choose the hard way with the small chance to become a legend in his hometown by bringing the Cup home. Why win a fourth cup in Chicago, when clearly the bigger and much more difficult ( maybe impossible) quest would be to win the cup with Buffalo. This is the only way he ends up here if he thinks like you and I. If he thinks "ya know what, I've done so much in Chicago. Maybe I should go home and give them a boost." Imagine the offseason of 2015 if we land one of McDavid/Eichel and also get Kabe? Wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted June 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 Please do not burn me for the following comment. If Chicago wins the third cup, I believe Kane would have won everything in Chicago and may be open to choose the hard way with the small chance to become a legend in his hometown by bringing the Cup home. Why win a fourth cup in Chicago, when clearly the bigger and much more difficult ( maybe impossible) quest would be to win the cup with Buffalo. I feel this way too. Especially if he wins this year and next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 I'm pulling for the Blackhawks. I love that team. Another cup makes them a near dynasty which hasn't happened in a long time. Couldn't agree more. Plus, you know, Girgensons-McDavid-Kane :ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 I'm pulling for the Blackhawks. I love that team. Another cup makes them a near dynasty which hasn't happened in a long time. Near dynasty? If three Cups in four years isn't a dynasty, I don't know what is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 Near dynasty? If three Cups in four years isn't a dynasty, I don't know what is. It'd be three in five. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 It'd be three in five. As I said in the other thread, heat has fried my brain :lol: That aside, I'd still consider it a dynasty. Back to backs haven't been done since the last 90s Wings, and nobody else has come close to 3/5 in the cap era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 As I said in the other thread, heat has fried my brain :lol: That aside, I'd still consider it a dynasty. Back to backs haven't been done since the last 90s Wings, and nobody else has come close to 3/5 in the cap era. I probably would, too. But I think near-dynasty would cover all opinions on them haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sloth Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 (edited) Patrick Kane already has a point in this game! Go Chicago. Make that 2. Edited June 2, 2014 by thanes16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 So...if the Blackhawks win this one, it could be the frosting on Quenneville's HoF induction cake. Looks like LA skipped the vanilla mocha frappe today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Yeesh, bad luck for Quick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Wings Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Looks like LA skipped the vanilla mocha frappe today. Not so fast, my friend...even with the bad luck goal. LA is not done and is scary good when they get a momentum-changing goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Amerk Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Great game so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Crotch Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Another great game. Did you expect anything less? :thumbsup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Everytime I see Toffoli score I get more upset that we weren't able to get him. Seems like LA knew what they were doing when they decide to keep him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 I didn't expect so many damn penalties. Is this the same crew who officiated game 5? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Crotch Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Too many marginal penalty calls for a Game 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
... Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 I have never seen a goalie lose thier stick as much as Quick does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 I have never seen a goalie lose thier stick as much as Quick does. Hasek was before your time? :huh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Amerk Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Hasek was before your time? :huh: IIRC, Hextall was another one that lost his stick often (when he wasnt using it to hack and slash). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.