Jump to content

GDT: Buffalo at San Jose 11-05-13 at 10:30 PM EST

26CornerBlitz

By 26CornerBlitz
in The Aud Club

Recommended Posts

BuffaloBorn Top Prospect

BuffaloBorn

Posted
Posted

Anderson sv percentage is .912 and he's injured... Jonathan Quick is lost with a .896 sv. So the question is at the Olympics this year is IS IT MILLER TIME??!?!? btw yes everyone in san jose forums is b*tching about that call.Who cares? I don't. Sharks fans are vicious, trying everything to bring sabres down "they're goons" "they suck" "they're jerseys from 6 years ago suck"yadadada They could suck it. They lost. They suck. I would totally troll their boards but I figure If I can get banned for talking about how there aren't any muslim sabres, I'd get banned for telling the sharks how much they suck for not scoring

Iron Crotch All Star

Iron Crotch

Posted
Posted

Look for Shanaban to award the victory to SJ later today and include something about Kaleta in the announcement.

 

We made the league happy by waiving Kaleta. The lack of a review on the Sharks OT goals is just the league's way of reciprocating for the Kaleta demotion. :P

TrueBlueGED Hall of Famer

TrueBlueGED

Posted
Posted

Anderson sv percentage is .912 and he's injured... Jonathan Quick is lost with a .896 sv. So the question is at the Olympics this year is IS IT MILLER TIME??!?!?

 

People say Miller only had one great year...they should take a look at Quick's numbers since his Conn Smythe run, and take into consideration he's playing behind a great possession team.

LTS First Liner

LTS

Posted
Posted

What's funny about your statement is that this has been the best execution of a 2-1-2 I've seen in a long time by this team. The system doesn't work if you don't play this way.

 

Pressure fore-check.. something that is needed every night. It was beautiful to watch tonight. The D pinching as needed. When your forwards are committed to back-checking the D can take additional chances to slow up the rush.

 

So what, he scored a SO goal. Do you all want Kotalik back now?

 

Maybe?

 

But there have been worse calls. Scoring through the side of the net comes to mind.

 

Or skate in the crease... :blink:

 

They genuinely played like a top team tonight. The breakdowns showed their youth and inexperience (and perhaps lack of skill). They are expected.

 

The other night I had a theory about a team's swagger and compete. It revolved around defensemen flattening any player near the net when a shot toward the goal occurred. The Sabres never seem to knock forwards down when they get that free shot. Last night I saw it happen a few times. The point shot happened and there was a forward being crushed to the ice.

 

I'm sticking with this theory for now. Perhaps we can have some advanced stats on that!

 

If the team played like that and lost every night it would be a hell of a lot more interesting. They just need to keep that up, lots of fight in them.

G-Daddy Fourth Liner

G-Daddy

Posted
Posted

 

 

We made the league happy by waiving Kaleta. The lack of a review on the Sharks OT goals is just the league's way of reciprocating for the Kaleta demotion. :P

 

Accepted! Did we ever get compensated for No Goal?

apuszczalowski First Liner

apuszczalowski

Posted
Posted

Look for Shanaban to award the victory to SJ later today and include something about Kaleta in the announcement.

He will just fine Ron for player selection, by allowing someone like Myers to be out on the ice in a situation where he could help them cheat and block the refs view of the goal...............
LGR4GM Hall of Famer

LGR4GM

Posted
Posted

People say Miller only had one great year...they should take a look at Quick's numbers since his Conn Smythe run, and take into consideration he's playing behind a great possession team.

Interesting note if you look at 2010 to present (the year after the Olympics)

Ryan Miller: 5,478shots with 5,018saves for a 0.916sv%

Jonathan Quick: 4,709shots with 4,321savres for 0.918sv%

 

Meaning that while facing an additional 769 shots over the last 3 years and including Quick's Vezina nominated year (which he had .929sv% = to Ryans vezina year) the difference in overall sv% is a paltry .002 which if you do not round is 0.00157688696

 

I think I would take Ryan Miller over Jonathan Quick at this juncture.

Stoner Hall of Famer

Stoner

Posted
Posted

On the Sharks' goal in OT, I'm left wondering why they got rid of the goal judge behind the net. Wasn't it something to do with opening up a few seats to sell? Surely a goal judge from that angle would have turned the light on. Would it have made a difference?

darksabre Hall of Famer

darksabre

Posted
Posted

On the Sharks' goal in OT, I'm left wondering why they got rid of the goal judge behind the net. Wasn't it something to do with opening up a few seats to sell? Surely a goal judge from that angle would have turned the light on. Would it have made a difference?

 

Absolutely would have made a difference. Technically the ref has to defer to the goal judge.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...