Jump to content

John Scott Suspension: 7 Games, Will Not Appeal


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

Posted

3-4 games for the hit. 3-4 games for being John Scott.

2games for the hit, 2 games for John Scott, 3 games for being a Sabre.

 

Patrick Kaleta: 4games for the hit 3games cuz its Kaleta, and 3 games because he is a Sabre

Posted

Why not? That makes zero sense

 

My guess: Because he's been all but told that the league is gunning to eliminate his type from the game and that if he wants any hope of sticking around for a while he should accept this punishment, move forward, and govern himself accordingly.

Posted

Brendan Shanahan is in way over his head at the Department of Player Safety.

 

 

How does John Scott get a 7 game suspension when he's never been suspended before, nor fined in his NHL career?

 

Scott is a first time offender, yet the NHL is treating him like he has a miles-long rap sheet.

 

I watched the BS explanation from the Politbureau, if what they are saying is gospel going forward, bye bye full contact hockey!

Posted

Brendan Shanahan is in way over his head at the Department of Player Safety.

 

 

How does John Scott get a 7 game suspension when he's never been suspended before, nor fined in his NHL career?

 

Scott is a first time offender, yet the NHL is treating him like he has a miles-long rap sheet.

 

I watched the BS explanation from the Politbureau, if what they are saying is gospel going forward, bye bye full contact hockey!

 

I totally agree

Posted

I still don't really blame Shanahan. After all, he's just doing the bidding of the old guys who run the teams and league. Remember the suspensions he handed out right when he took over? Yea, those stopped after the GM meetings that year.

Posted

Brendan Shanahan is in way over his head at the Department of Player Safety.

 

 

How does John Scott get a 7 game suspension when he's never been suspended before, nor fined in his NHL career?

 

Scott is a first time offender, yet the NHL is treating him like he has a miles-long rap sheet.

 

I watched the BS explanation from the Politbureau, if what they are saying is gospel going forward, bye bye full contact hockey!

 

Based off the way he looks, and the skill level he possesses. Which shows the system itself is broken and unfair. And that it also really is only half serious about fixing the problems present in the game.

 

I'm slightly shocked that the NHLPA is not halfheartedly challenging this if only for the precedent.

Posted

Based off the way he looks, and the skill level he possesses. Which shows the system itself is broken and unfair. And that it also really is only half serious about fixing the problems present in the game.

 

I'm slightly shocked that the NHLPA is not halfheartedly challenging this if only for the precedent.

They should be more concerned with the health of Ericksson than a goon like Scott. If anything, the NHLPA should be calling for harsher penalties for the likes of Scott with the goal of eliminating them from their ranks.

Posted

They should be more concerned with the health of Ericksson than a goon like Scott. If anything, the NHLPA should be calling for harsher penalties for the likes of Scott with the goal of eliminating them from their ranks.

 

I think the way to eliminate goons from the game is to call the rules the way they are meant to be called. We were very close to losing all of the John Scott's of the world after 05/06. Then the league has allowed for more clutching/grabbing to come back in. Add in the inconsistency of Shanahan and there is sadly a need for the Scott's, Orr's, Parros' of the world.

 

I still contend that the biggest danger comes from players who are actually on the ice. Getting knocked out on an open ice hit by John Scott probably has similar odds to winning the lotto. He plays 4-5 minutes a night, and isn't fast enough to catch anyone. In my opinion the bigger problem is allowing "real hockey players" to play on the edge. Chara is the easy example here....he plays 30 minutes a night and I believe he's never seen a suspension. Yet he's more of a danger to his opponents than #32 is....simply because he's on the ice so much more. This is my whole gripe with the disciplinary process. Shanahan takes the easy road, banishing players who bring nothing to the table and enabling those who really should sit out for player safety.

Posted

I think the way to eliminate goons from the game is to call the rules the way they are meant to be called. We were very close to losing all of the John Scott's of the world after 05/06. Then the league has allowed for more clutching/grabbing to come back in. Add in the inconsistency of Shanahan and there is sadly a need for the Scott's, Orr's, Parros' of the world.

 

 

Yep yep yep.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...