calti Posted October 28, 2013 Report Posted October 28, 2013 man--what a huge wiff on Myers...he was gonna be the next Chris pronger...Sad.
beerme1 Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 man--what a huge wiff on Myers...he was gonna be the next Chris pronger...Sad. Some people called him more a tall Niedermayer type of player.
Hoss Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 Why would the Sabres? Or are you kidding? No. The Oilers don't even consider that Moulson and a first deal. It doesn't address any of their needs. Moulson, Myers and a first for Yakupov and Hemsky.
Eleven Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 No. The Oilers don't even consider that Moulson and a first deal. It doesn't address any of their needs. Moulson, Myers and a first for Yakupov and Hemsky. The Vanek deal didn't address any of Buffalo's needs, either. Just sayin'.
beerme1 Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 No. The Oilers don't even consider that Moulson and a first deal. It doesn't address any of their needs. Moulson, Myers and a first for Yakupov and Hemsky. You're a scary dude lol
apuszczalowski Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 The Vanek deal didn't address any of Buffalo's needs, either. Just sayin'. Yes it did, It allowed Darcy to Accumulate more draft picks. Draft Picks = WINNING!
Hoss Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 The Vanek deal didn't address any of Buffalo's needs, either. Just sayin'. I'm saying the Moulson deal doesn't address any of the Oilers needs. And the Vanek deal DID address needs for Buffalo: draft picks. All we "need" right now are picks and prospects. You're a scary dude lol In what manner? In the manner that I'm realistic about what a team will be looking to get for the first overall pick from a year ago? They NEED defense and aren't dealing him without some coming back. A rental player and a mid-first isn't getting him. A dman who has potential but a bad contract, the rental offensive talent and the pick might be enough.
beerme1 Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 I'm saying the Moulson deal doesn't address any of the Oilers needs. And the Vanek deal DID address needs for Buffalo: draft picks. All we "need" right now are picks and prospects. In what manner? In the manner that I'm realistic about what a team will be looking to get for the first overall pick from a year ago? They NEED defense and aren't dealing him without some coming back. A rental player and a mid-first isn't getting him. A dman who has potential but a bad contract, the rental offensive talent and the pick might be enough. I think we can do better with what you are offering. Much better. You're taking two player they don't want from them.
Hoss Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 I think we can do better with what you are offering. Much better. You're taking two player they don't want from them. I'm confused. Do you expect us to use our scraps to get young players that other teams don't want to give up? It doesn't matter that they allegedly "don't want" Yakupov. He still is one of the most valuable young players in the league. He was the first pick a year ago. There's no getting around that fact. It'll take a whole lot to get him.
LGR4GM Posted October 29, 2013 Report Posted October 29, 2013 I'm confused. Do you expect us to use our scraps to get young players that other teams don't want to give up? It doesn't matter that they allegedly "don't want" Yakupov. He still is one of the most valuable young players in the league. He was the first pick a year ago. There's no getting around that fact. It'll take a whole lot to get him. Maybe. The only comparable that is in the ballpark (kinda) is the Eric Johnson trade. Now Johnson was traded with a 1st and Jay Clement for Chris Stewart, Shattenkirk and a 2nd. IMO we are looking at a similar trade if we were to trade with Edmonton. Say Myers, McNabb, 2nd rounder for Yakupov, and Arcobello. Now that may or may not be in the ballpark but I think it would be.
BuffaloBorn Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 To whom it may concern, when I said Neil Yakupov would be the first muslim sabre. I meant it as it sounded, I've done my research. Anyone who saw anything vulgar or inflammatory in what I said, there is something wrong with YOU not me, not my problem! Not my problem at all, I also mentioned I can't see him in blue & gold and look? He's not coming. Vanek is no longer an asset to be traded to Edmonton, who are we gonna trade for Yakupov now? Miller? Moulson? I don't think so, Call me psychic. Anyway, I hope you all don't think I'm racist for a trivial fact, I'm gonna go on with life knowing I was right, Yakupov ain't coming here lol And i don't care what anyone thinks of me, just don't ban me for doing nothing wrong (not talking to mod specifically, more so the people who made a big deal out of it so I heard). crap I'm getting banned for this post too lol( official close thread)
darksabre Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 Well, that ends that. Yeah, he was talking about NEIL Yakupov, not NAIL.
Stoner Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 Thanks BuffaloBorn. I tried to encourage caution after your posts, FWIW. If you got banned for that post, that's a joke. Yeah, he was talking about NEIL Yakupov, not NAIL. Stop it, Mrs. d4rk.
darksabre Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 Thanks BuffaloBorn. I tried to encourage caution after your posts, FWIW. If you got banned for that post, that's a joke. Stop it, Mrs. d4rk. The alphabet is right up there on the wall guys, come on! There's even pictures! A is for Arbitrator, B is for Boarding, C is for Colin Campbell...
dEnnis the Menace Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 D is for Darcy which is synonymous with suffering
beerme1 Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 Moulson, Myers and a first for Yakupov and Hemsky. You're a scary dude lol In what manner? In the manner that I'm realistic about what a team will be looking to get for the first overall pick from a year ago? They NEED defense and aren't dealing him without some coming back. A rental player and a mid-first isn't getting him. A dman who has potential but a bad contract, the rental offensive talent and the pick might be enough. I'll try to clarify but admittedly that's not something I'm good at. And this is gonna be worse than ever so I owe you one clarifying statement somewhere down the road. You: Moulson, Myers and a first for Yak and Hemsky Me: I want to keep Moulson, Myers contract is untradeable, don't want Yak despite having some O talent and Hemsky Edmonton would probably just give you as a throw in. Say salary relief. Yes they need D, Myers D? lol. Erhoff contract would be better to them but again D? lol. They struck out with Yak. I don't want their headache and they don't want ours in Myers. But in the spirit of dealing with them, I will give them Stafford, Leino and a 2015 first for their 2014 first and Yak. I do not want Yak a cancer at such a young age could damage our room beyond repair with his attitude. I don't know when we will have a normal, understandable exchange. This aint it. Sorry. I'll try again Sunday morning about 3 am!!!! :-) Sure is windy outside no?
nfreeman Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 I'll try to clarify but admittedly that's not something I'm good at. And this is gonna be worse than ever so I owe you one clarifying statement somewhere down the road. You: Moulson, Myers and a first for Yak and Hemsky Me: I want to keep Moulson, Myers contract is untradeable, don't want Yak despite having some O talent and Hemsky Edmonton would probably just give you as a throw in. Say salary relief. Yes they need D, Myers D? lol. Erhoff contract would be better to them but again D? lol. They struck out with Yak. I don't want their headache and they don't want ours in Myers. But in the spirit of dealing with them, I will give them Stafford, Leino and a 2015 first for their 2014 first and Yak. I do not want Yak a cancer at such a young age could damage our room beyond repair with his attitude. I don't know when we will have a normal, understandable exchange. This aint it. Sorry. I'll try again Sunday morning about 3 am!!!! :-) Sure is windy outside no? Awfully generous of you. Why don't you throw in a case of herpes and ask them for their 2016 first-rounder as well?
shrader Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 Awfully generous of you. Why don't you throw in a case of herpes and ask them for their 2016 first-rounder as well? I'm not so sure Edmonton does that. Herpes is way too inconsistent for Edmonton, only showing up on some nights.
sabre snipe Posted November 1, 2013 Report Posted November 1, 2013 http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/yakupov-grigorenko-nichushkin-and-the-khl/ Here is a good read on yakupov, our boy grigorenko, and the guy most everyone wanted or hated, nichushkin.
CallawaySabres Posted November 12, 2013 Report Posted November 12, 2013 Those of you who want him, now is the chance......seems like a big risk though http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/11/11/report-yakupovs-agent-to-meet-with-edmonton-brass/
Hoss Posted November 12, 2013 Report Posted November 12, 2013 Those of you who want him, now is the chance......seems like a big risk though http://prohockeytalk...edmonton-brass/ This drama is making me sick. I think I'm gonna Yak.
MattPie Posted November 12, 2013 Report Posted November 12, 2013 This drama is making me sick. I think I'm gonna Yak. Yak it up, smart guy. We'll see who is smiling at the end.
Hoss Posted November 12, 2013 Report Posted November 12, 2013 Yak it up, smart guy. We'll see who is smiling at the end. :huh: What?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.