Drunkard Posted November 6, 2013 Report Posted November 6, 2013 I took a bath on that one. It was nice to see Buffalo actually look like they wanted to win and pull through though. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted November 6, 2013 Report Posted November 6, 2013 On 11/6/2013 at 2:29 PM, Ghost of Dwight Drane said: Interesting how the refs don't review that SJ goal in OT...... Carnage abound. I had the same thought. ALL the money going on the Sharks and that doesn't get reviewed? Talk about bad optics. Quote
wjag Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 Buffalo at LA Buffalo +220 LA Kings -260 Quote
Cereal Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 On 11/5/2013 at 7:37 PM, Cereal said: Shucks... I'll have to wait until the matchup at Philly on Nov. 21 as my safest bet on the underdog this month (or maybe @NJ Nov. 30). On a side note, I'll be in Philly for work 11/21 and looking to attend that game, if anyone has an extra ticket or wanting to go. On 11/6/2013 at 2:51 PM, Ghost of Dwight Drane said: Updated board.....last night was a gamechanger. And again.....if you are under a unit of $100, you are allowed to go "all-in". I will even be kind enough to round your winnings up to the nearest $5. Don't call ME negative! If I have $100, am I allowed to go all in on LA (who is at -260)? Or do I only have the option to bet on an underdog? This is a slightly different situation than for someone with less than 100 (because I AM capable of following the multiples rule). Quote
Ghost of Dwight Drane Posted November 7, 2013 Author Report Posted November 7, 2013 On 11/7/2013 at 12:58 PM, Cereal said: If I have $100, am I allowed to go all in on LA (who is at -260)? Or do I only have the option to bet on an underdog? This is a slightly different situation than for someone with less than 100 (because I AM capable of following the multiples rule). You can put it on the favorite. Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 @360 so 260 on LA leaving me 100 bones Quote
chileanseabass Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 I'm at 300. Going all 300 on Buffalo. Quote
Eleven Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 That line is uninspiring. I'll stay put. Quote
wjag Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 260 on Kings. At 1355 after that last bet. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 Sabres win two in a row? I think not! 520 on LA. Quote
qwksndmonster Posted November 7, 2013 Report Posted November 7, 2013 30 on kings let it ride... :sick: Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 After my brutal loss from the last game I will gladly sit this line out.... Even tho I think we lose 4-1 I'm like rahn, playing not to lose Quote
Taro T Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 Don't line Enroth 'tween the pipes tonight, but they'll win 2 in a row sometime. At $1,105. 1unit ($100) on Sabres. Quote
wjag Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 Back on the winning, I'm mean losing track. Upto 1455 Quote
wjag Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 Buffalo vs Anaheim Buffalo +250 Anaheim -300 At 1455 ... 300 on Anaheim Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 at 460 after last night... 300 on Anaheim. Quote
nobody Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 All in with my mighty 75 or 80 or whatever it is on the Ducks. Quote
Drunkard Posted November 8, 2013 Report Posted November 8, 2013 At 440 and I'll put 300 on Anaheim. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.