Jump to content

Job Performance Poll: Head Coach Ron Rolston

IKnowPhysics

By IKnowPhysics
in The Aud Club

 Share

Job Performance Poll: Head Coach Ron Rolston  

101 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale from 1 to 10, rate the CURRENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE of Ron Rolston as the Head Coach of the Buffalo Sabres:

  2. 2. On a scale from 1 to 10, rate the EXPECTED FUTURE PERFORMANCE of Ron Rolston as the Head Coach of the Buffalo Sabres:

  3. 3. On a scale from 1 to 10, rate the RESPONSIBILITY of Ron Rolston as the Head Coach of the Buffalo Sabres FOR THE CURRENT WIN/LOSS RECORD OF THE TEAM:

    • 1 - Not Responsible at All for the Current Win/Loss Record of the Team
      4
    • 2
      7
    • 3
      11
    • 4
      11
    • 5 - Somewhat Repsonsible for the Current Win/Loss Record of the Team
      16
    • 6
      8
    • 7
      14
    • 8
      10
    • 9
      4
    • 10 - Entirely Responsible for the Current Win/Loss Record of the Team
      1

Recommended Posts

dudacek Hall of Famer

dudacek

Posted
Posted

What's the consensus on Ron?

A) hired in good faith because the organization believed he was the right man long-term to guide the rebuild to fruition.

B) hired as a placeholder for a year or two who could teach the kids while the organization was burned down around him.

North Buffalo All Star

North Buffalo

Posted
Posted (edited)

Rolston is in a pretty unique position. The idea is to tank, and so they hire a coach who, while on the one hand will teach the kids the game, will also guarantee at least one season of tanking.

 

I think Regier and crew are gambling that Rolston doesn't finally figure out this whole NHL coaching thing by the beginning of next season. Perhaps they plan to give him two seasons to tank, and season three to audition for the "real" job after they get their picks.

 

So, Rolston gets two seasons of baptism by fire to learn how to win as an NHL coach. That's a gift to someone who never played in the league.

 

And that is the juxtaposition we are in trying to understand Darcy's motives and strategy. My only contrary point is if so why didn't the Sabres tank at the end of last year? Because of Darcy's incompetence? He didn't get rid of Vanek or Miller soon enough. Pommer was a good start. I guess keeping Stafford on the team helps with your theory.

Edited by North Buffalo
Sabres Fan in NS Hall of Famer

Sabres Fan in NS

Posted
Posted

What's the consensus on Ron?

A) hired in good faith because the organization believed he was the right man long-term to guide the rebuild to fruition.

B) hired as a placeholder for a year or two who could teach the kids while the organization was burned down around him.

 

There may not ever end up being a consensus, but I'll take option B.

TrueBlueGED Hall of Famer

TrueBlueGED

Posted
Posted

What's the consensus on Ron?

A) hired in good faith because the organization believed he was the right man long-term to guide the rebuild to fruition.

B) hired as a placeholder for a year or two who could teach the kids while the organization was burned down around him.

 

I don't know if he was hired with the intention of firing him in a year or two, but I believe they were absolutely aware he'd be an easy fire if the time came.

  • 10 months later...
Kristian First Liner

Kristian

Posted
Posted

They're getting the band back together in the desert.

Anyone seen Larry Quinn?

 

Oh great! You HAD to go and do that.... Mention his name....!!

 

Everybody look for the presser before pre-season, in which TP announces Larry the Moron is the new President of Hockey Operations.

 

I called it :flirt:

darksabre Hall of Famer

darksabre

Posted
Posted

 

 

Oh great! You HAD to go and do that.... Mention his name....!!

 

Everybody look for the presser before pre-season, in which TP announces Larry the Moron is the new President of Hockey Operations.

 

I called it :flirt:

 

It's okay he didn't say his name three times while looking at his checkbook.

Taro T Hall of Famer

Taro T

Posted
Posted

What's the point of this poll? The topic is moot.

 

Talk about beating a dead horse!

This thread was started almost a year ago. The horse wasn't dead, but certainly was worthy of the beating at the time. Thread was revived simply to pass on new news about Ron Rol.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...