rickshaw Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 (edited) Hey all, hope your summer has been great. First post in awhile, so I thought I'd start a new thread. I see that Pat Kaleta has already jumped a so-called soft player for delivering a clean check, and then turtled when asked to go with someone who can handle himself. My question is, do we really need him on this team? He's got a terrible reputation and the refs are not shy in hitting him up for penalties at any given moment. Personally, I think it's time for him to go. I know he's a Buffalo kid, but I believe he does more harm than good for this team. Let someone else play who has a physical edge and a more honourable game. Thoughts? Edited September 19, 2013 by rickshaw Quote
That Aud Smell Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I dunno. I like him quite well as a 4th-line forward and 2nd-unit PK guy. Those guys in the league tend to be somewhat interchangeable, so it's nice to fill that slot with a local guy. Plus, he's a helluva lot faster than most 4th line energy guys. I tend to agree that he needs to answer the bell if he's going to run around like that. I also wish he'd do less of the running around -- the guy just needs to pick his spots more. Quote
biodork Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I might be in the minority, but I'd prefer to keep Kaleta on our team. He does need to be careful and pick his spots (like Aud said) since Shanny has him under the microscope, but he's invaluable on the PK and one of the few players you can count on every night to play hard. When he's doing it right, he does a great job of drawing penalities and taking the other team off their game. I like him much better on the Sabres than I would on any opponent's team! Quote
MattPie Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I might be in the minority, but I'd prefer to keep Kaleta on our team. He does need to be careful and pick his spots (like Aud said) since Shanny has him under the microscope, but he's invaluable on the PK and one of the few players you can count on every night to play hard. When he's doing it right, he does a great job of drawing penalities and taking the other team off their game. I like him much better on the Sabres than I would on any opponent's team! I don't think you're in the minority, I think a somewhat vocal minority does want him gone. Rickshaw, how about a poll on this post? How about: Gone, Keep, or Keep only if he cleans up. I think he's valuable enough that if he picks his spots (and he seems to have been better about that lately, last game notwithstanding), he has enough speed, hands, and D ability to be worthwhile guy on the 4th line. Quote
dudacek Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 Keep. He needs to produce a touch more offence than last year, but he's fast, hard to play against and can kill penalties. I think he provides exactly what you want on the fourth line. Saw a debate on another board about his penalty risk. Somebody pulled out a stat that showed for every penalty Kaleta takes per 60 minutes, he draws something like four from the other team. Sorry, I can't source it at the moment, but it does ring true. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 Kaleta brings some serious defensive value to a team with way too many one-dimensional forwards. Not only do I think we should keep him, but I think it would be crazy to get rid of him with the current roster construction. There may be a day we don't need him, but this is not that day. Quote
LGR4GM Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 Kaleta for me should be kept. Ideally I would like him to actually play on the 3rd line. Kaleta is really good at closing gaps and shutting guys down and he is deceptively fast with decent hands. Girgensons - Larsson - Kaleta could wreak havoc as a 3rd line. I am in favor of keeping him and giving him more of a role. That being said he needs to clean up his act by say 25% Quote
inkman Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 Hey all, hope your summer has been great. First post in awhile, so I thought I'd start a new thread. I see that Pat Kaleta has already jumped a so-called soft player for delivering a clean check, and then turtled when asked to go with someone who can handle himself. His turtling days are few and far between. I'm disappointed he didn't throw with Prust but its become the exception no the rule. He'll throw with just about anyone in his weight class and even guys a class or two up. Quote
biodork Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 His turtling days are few and far between. I'm disappointed he didn't throw with Prust but its become the exception no the rule. He'll throw with just about anyone in his weight class and even guys a class or two up. I think this one is my favorite: http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/117349 Quote
Hawerchuk Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I think you picked the wrong guy. Why do we have John Scott on this team? I think he's way less valuable than Kaleta. Pat looks like he's really going to be more picky with his fights this year, stay relatively clean and he even said he's committed to being a top penalty killer. He brings more value than Scott. Quote
biodork Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I think you picked the wrong guy. Why do we have John Scott on this team? I think he's way less valuable than Kaleta. Pat looks like he's really going to be more picky with his fights this year, stay relatively clean and he even said he's committed to being a top penalty killer. He brings more value than Scott. Somebody's gotta fight when Kaleta's neck flares up again. :( All kidding aside, I mostly agree... I think Scott was really brought it mostly to address the fans' complaints about team softness (although maybe to appease Miller as well). Quote
spndnchz Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 Or this one... For a guy making just over a million he brings a lot. Every night. Now, Stafford on the other hand... Quote
Kristian Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I could care less if he answers the bell, lots of other teams have agitators who never fight anyone out of their class. Not particularly fond of that part of his game, but I'm quite tired of the Sabres having to be somewhat of a moral beacon in this league. A lot of other teams have cheapshot artists too, maybe the Sabres need a few more? Not much fun in always being on the receiving end. Quote
qwksndmonster Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I could care less if he answers the bell, lots of other teams have agitators who never fight anyone out of their class. Not particularly fond of that part of his game, but I'm quite tired of the Sabres having to be somewhat of a moral beacon in this league. A lot of other teams have cheapshot artists too, maybe the Sabres need a few more? Not much fun in always being on the receiving end. We definitely need more. Good call. Quote
nfreeman Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 I don't think you're in the minority, I think a somewhat vocal minority does want him gone. Rickshaw, how about a poll on this post? How about: Gone, Keep, or Keep only if he cleans up. I think he's valuable enough that if he picks his spots (and he seems to have been better about that lately, last game notwithstanding), he has enough speed, hands, and D ability to be worthwhile guy on the 4th line. Keep. He needs to produce a touch more offence than last year, but he's fast, hard to play against and can kill penalties. I think he provides exactly what you want on the fourth line. Saw a debate on another board about his penalty risk. Somebody pulled out a stat that showed for every penalty Kaleta takes per 60 minutes, he draws something like four from the other team. Sorry, I can't source it at the moment, but it does ring true. I agree with both of these 100%. Quote
... Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 His turtling days are few and far between. I'm disappointed he didn't throw with Prust but its become the exception no the rule. He'll throw with just about anyone in his weight class and even guys a class or two up. Agreed. At least he's out there doing SOMETHING against players larger than he. And when the coaches can anticipate it, they put Big John out there as well. I think a NHL team needs these types of players - for those wanting PURE hockey, ah, this IS pure hockey. Kaleta lays it out there 100% every game, even when he's not 100%. He's fast, great on the PK, a very good defensive player, and he can finish garbage goals and short-handers when the time comes. Totally worth the money and the roster spot. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted September 18, 2013 Report Posted September 18, 2013 Man. Even with all the cautionary things I think and feel about the need to better manage head trauma in pro sports, those fight clips have a way of getting the blood going. And I should add: I didn't mean to suggest by my post above that Kaleta doesn't answer the bell (Inkie is right on his turtling days being over); I was more responding to a report that he apparently did not answer the bell in a preseason game. He's a heart and soul guy. I very much like having him on the squad. And if I had to guess, I'd think that active Sabre fans (not just fairly obsessive ones like those around here) favor his being on the roster by an overwhelming majority (I'll go with 85%, conservatively). Quote
wjag Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 I'm completely agnostic. If I woke up tomorrow and he was gone I would not miss him. If he stays, so be it. If he had any offense at all, I would feel differently. Quote
HopefulFuture Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 (edited) Kaleta could go, I could care less. Yes he brings a PK quality, many teams have players like this. Yes he draws penalties, many teams have players like this. Yes he plays with blood and guts, some teams have a player like this. Yes he takes penalties that are unnecessary, some teams have a player like this. Yes he doesn't answer the bell when called upon, some teams have a player like this. He's expendable, not disposable. He can be replaced with a smarter player for sure, but as for now he serves a purpose, we keep him until a better option emerges. Edited September 19, 2013 by HopefulFuture Quote
Peppy22 Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 I think this year... stay but next year it will be tough for him when the young players are pushing even harder for a spot on the team. Quote
Weave Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 I'm completely agnostic. If I woke up tomorrow and he was gone I would not miss him. If he stays, so be it. If he had any offense at all, I would feel differently. this is about where I stand. Quote
Rox11 Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 Keep him ... if Buffalo had any type of strong power play, the penalties he does draw, should help with a few goals. His PK is a lot of fun to watch, too. Quote
SneakyPete77 Posted September 19, 2013 Report Posted September 19, 2013 (edited) Keep him. He gives 100% every shift. He's decent on the pk, blocks shots, plus he takes the opposition off their game. Would I like to see him fight more when the opportunity presents itself? Of course, but the fact that he doesn't gets under the oppositions skin even more. They're more focused on him than their game plan. Edited September 20, 2013 by SneakyPete77 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.