Stoner Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 The charge: meddling. I'm more than happy to lead the prosecution. I'm serious. I think it could be fun. We'll pick jurors, have opening and closing arguments, deliberation, a verdict. Anyone want to defend him? Throw your name into the jury pool? P.S. We need a judge. I've never seen chz in a black robe, but if anybody could "clear a courtroom"... Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 The charge: meddling. I'm more than happy to lead the prosecution. I'm serious. I think it could be fun. We'll pick jurors, have opening and closing arguments, deliberation, a verdict. Anyone want to defend him? Throw your name into the jury pool? :unsure: And try to find an impartial jury, or judge for that mattter. Quote
LastPommerFan Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 First you;ll have to provide enough evidence for an indictment. Quote
spndnchz Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Couldn't agree more. He should've just given that half a billion to Buffalo and shut the hell up. Quote
North Buffalo Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) Over the top, I think this preposterous. First we do not know what kind of relationship Pegula has with hockey decisions and if he really was meddling would Darcy still be here? Second, I think it is way too early in his ownership history to have any opinion one way or another on his management strategy even if he is as you suggest, meddling. Sometimes a little meddling can be good and other times bad, I think the jury should not even be called at this point and only an on going investigation should be announced. Edited April 26, 2013 by North Buffalo Quote
HopefulFuture Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I have no feeling one way or the other of Mr. Pegula's role with the team. I don't feel I have enough information to make an informed decision as to whether or not he's been to involved, not involved enough or absent altogether with no sympathy for the fan base. I'd like to hear the case being brought by PA on this, it will be interesting. Quote
SwampD Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I think the case is going to be thrown out due do an overzealous prosecutor. Quote
LastPommerFan Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I'd like to hear the case being brought by PA on this, it will be interesting. PA has a long history of tearing down Buffalo Sabres ownership. His whereabouts are fuzzy at best on the nights of May 22nd, 1996 and June 23rd, 1998, the nights of the mysterious murders of the Knox Brothers. PA's sick plot gets deeper when you find he was aid the the chief legal council for Adelphia, and was likely the last person to to speak with President George W. Bush prior to his decision not to pardon the Rigas Family in 2008. And in the most "comic book villian" act to date, PA is known to have been following Tom Galisano around for years, stealthily slipping packets of sugar stolen form local restaurants into his pockets. It was only a matter of time before PA and his Deluminati henchmen moved on the TP. Quote
darksabre Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I didn't realize we were in Salem... Quote
X. Benedict Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I think our next trial should be over whether or not Chad Ruhwedel is a complete bust. <looks at the man's chest like Leslie Neilson> Not yet. But with years of inactivity and drinking cheap beer, it may become one. Quote
Stoner Posted April 26, 2013 Author Report Posted April 26, 2013 Couldn't agree more. He should've just given that half a billion to Buffalo and shut the hell up. bio, do you own a black robe? Quote
IKnowPhysics Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g "Well, we did do the nose... and the hat- but she is a witch!" Edited April 26, 2013 by IKnowPhysics Quote
North Buffalo Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) PA has a long history of tearing down Buffalo Sabres ownership. His whereabouts are fuzzy at best on the nights of May 22nd, 1996 and June 23rd, 1998, the nights of the mysterious murders of the Knox Brothers. PA's sick plot gets deeper when you find he was aid the the chief legal council for Adelphia, and was likely the last person to to speak with President George W. Bush prior to his decision not to pardon the Rigas Family in 2008. And in the most "comic book villian" act to date, PA is known to have been following Tom Galisano around for years, stealthily slipping packets of sugar stolen form local restaurants into his pockets. It was only a matter of time before PA and his Deluminati henchmen moved on the TP. The above is good legal strategy, attack the accuser and let me add to it does PA have any relationship to a certain negative Buffalo News reporter or more plausibly to certain Canadian entrepenneur who wants to put a team in Hamilton.... I smell a conspiracy :P Edited April 26, 2013 by North Buffalo Quote
That Aud Smell Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 PA, considerations of due process first require that the crime be defined with a constitutionally-sufficient level of detail. It was only a matter of time before PA and his Deluminati henchmen moved on the TP. full marks for "Deluminati". never heard of that one. Quote
wjag Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Not guilty.. Over zealous prosecutor apparently trying to put a notch on his keyboard. Loaded with nothing more than circumstantial evidence gathered from moronic beat writers, twitter-ers and message board GMs. Quote
Ghost of Dwight Drane Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I'm worried about you PA......last guy from the state who wanted to bring up some charges ended up MIA and his hard drive at the bottom of the river. Quote
Two or less Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 This could be fun. Let's set it up, PA. Quote
Weave Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 If you don't have a warrant I'm going to the ACLU with this one. Quote
Stoner Posted April 26, 2013 Author Report Posted April 26, 2013 I'm worried about you PA......last guy from the state who wanted to bring up some charges ended up MIA and his hard drive at the bottom of the river. Out of Office Reply: Sorry to have missed your post. I will be away from the keyboard until Monday, April 29. I will reply to your message at that time. PA, considerations of due process first require that the crime be defined with a constitutionally-sufficient level of detail. full marks for "Deluminati". never heard of that one. Your honor? Quote
That Aud Smell Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Your honor? Ha. Sure thing, if you'd like. But who'll be the legislative body that frames the law that Uncle Terry's charged with violating? In terms of a jury, I think you're best served by framing the questions that would be found on a verdict sheet in a separate poll thread. Quote
Stoner Posted April 26, 2013 Author Report Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) Ha. Sure thing, if you'd like. But who'll be the legislative body that frames the law that Uncle Terry's charged with violating? In terms of a jury, I think you're best served by framing the questions that would be found on a verdict sheet in a separate poll thread. Great! You've always been one of my favorite posters. If I see that you've replied to a post, it's a must click for me. Isn't the "law" already on the books? I would submit that the charge of "meddling" is universally understood in the context of sports owners. I would cite Bettman v. Avery. No definition of "sloppy seconds" found its way into the proceedings. Edited April 26, 2013 by PASabreFan Quote
Ghost of Dwight Drane Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 We're going to need top notch journalists and media getting the story out to the public with an unbiased viewpoint and no conflict of interest.....just like we see so often. I nominate Chz, Promo, and IKnowPhysics...... Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 The charge: meddling. I'm more than happy to lead the prosecution. I'm serious. I think it could be fun. We'll pick jurors, have opening and closing arguments, deliberation, a verdict. Anyone want to defend him? Throw your name into the jury pool? P.S. We need a judge. I've never seen chz in a black robe, but if anybody could "clear a courtroom"... Is this a trial or military tribunal? PTR Quote
X. Benedict Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I'm going to recuse myself, but may file an amicus curiea brief in comic sans at a later time. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.