qwksndmonster Posted March 19, 2013 Report Posted March 19, 2013 Since a lot of people have been posting thoughts on future roster possibilities all over the board lately (and resurrecting an old projection thread), I figured it'd be nice to have everyone's opinions on this in the same place. For the purpose of this thread let's assume the Sabres get one of the top prospects in the draft (because dreaming is nice). I want a turnaround like the Canucks had last year. What's the roster you'd like to see next year? Make trades if you want to, but try to keep them in the realm of reality. I kept trades to a minimum in mine because I have no idea who's going to be available right now. I'd like something along these lines: 'A' Vanek - Hodgson - Bullish RW with some skill acquired in trade or FA(DOAN DOAN DOAN DOAN DOOOOAAAAAAN ;) ) Ennis - MacKinnon - Bullish RW wth some skill acquired in trade or FA(Clowe -ish player? Like what Clowe was when he used to score? Maybe Marcus can step in if he keeps getting better?) 'C' Ott - Grigorenko - Leino Tropp - Flynn - Foligno Extra forward: Kaleta 'A' Ehrhoff - Physical stay at home defender so Ehrhoff can jump into the rush more often Sekera- Myers Weber - Pyssyk Pardy (resign for cheap if we can?) Miller Enroth Jettisoned for assets/players (these are the players that I would get rid of for sure; all other players on the roster are fair game if a good trade is there) Pommer Stafford Leopold Regehr Gerbe
qwksndmonster Posted March 19, 2013 Author Report Posted March 19, 2013 My scenario is heavily dependent on being able to draft MacKinnon. It's still short a shutdown center and if we came away with Drouin we could have him instead of one of the bullish RWs and acquire a good defensive center (or try to acquire one anyway). My hope is that we'll have enough ammunition in assets that we'll be able to get the trades done.
Peppy22 Posted March 19, 2013 Report Posted March 19, 2013 It all depends on how much it will take to re-sign Hodgson.... everything above 3.5 Million would be an overpayment so I hope Darcy(insert other GM) is smart enough to make a great deal.This is the "not so many moves" set-up for the next season. Not a huge chance to come true as I doubt, that Clarkson would sign with Buffalo. Clowe and Scuderi are a possibility. Vanek Hodgson Pominville Leino Grigorenko Clarkson Drouin Ennis Foligno"A" Clowe Ott"C" Kaleta Tropp Myers Ehrhoff"A" Sekera Weber Scuderi Pysyk Sulzer Miller Enroth Clowe: No idea how serious his shoulder injury is. That would be a concern. Scuderi: Dude has won 2 Cups and is the veteran on D we could need. Other than that with Myers(yes still Myers), Pysyk, McNabb und McCabe we have a bunch of Draft Prospects who can make the next step next year. I know what you are thinking.... WHAT OTT ON THE 4TH LINE? I am looking at a team that is able to roll 4 lines equally here as all 4 lines would have a scoring touch. So our 4th line would obviously play more than just 6 minutes per game. I have watched Clowe playing some games last year and damn I thought he would be a nice addition. He has not scored this year however it looks as if more players arent really finding the right gear with that short camp and short season. Clowe,Clarkson and Ott would be nice grit on our team as well. I still have Kaleta on the team hoping that he finally turns into the player he needs to be. If he doesn't to it, trade him. Gerbe is obviously out. I would try to trade him at the deadline, although I am not sure that we would find any teams that would take him. Hecht will not be back, Regehr, Leopold and Stafford will hopefully be traded as well. I would try to re-sign Sulzer as well. He is a cheap 7th man and very reliable.
thesportsbuff Posted March 19, 2013 Report Posted March 19, 2013 It all depends on how much it will take to re-sign Hodgson.... everything above 3.5 Million would be an overpayment so I hope Darcy(insert other GM) is smart enough to make a great deal. I don't mean to derail the thread but I just wanted to throw in my two cents on this one piece. I don't think Hodgson is going to demand more than 3.5, but if there is one guy on the team worth overpaying it's probably him. How many years now have we been in need of a #1 center? Hodgson fell into our lap in perhaps Darcy's greatest trade ever. I don't think they're going to let him get away, even if it means overpaying a little bit. But CoHo is still on his entry level deal and presumably his "big contract" is still a few years away.
qwksndmonster Posted March 20, 2013 Author Report Posted March 20, 2013 Adding Stoll from the kings (D for F trade at deadline?) would be a good move. Gritty shutdown center that wins lots of faceoffs. That would let us use Grigorenko on the wing while he learns.
Huckleberry Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 seeing at best we'll get drouin i think. Vanek - hodgon - pominville Ennis - grigorenko - drouin Ott - Flynn - Foligno Tropp - girgensons - kaleta erhoff - mcnabb/regehr ( if not traded) sekera - myers Weber - pysyk enroth miller I'd like that line up tbh :P Leino and stafford will be traded or bought out after darcy gets fired.
inkman Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 Adding Stoll from the kings Why exactly are they trading him?
X. Benedict Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 Why exactly are they trading him? Stoll is a rich man's Guastad. 2 more goals a year on average. :lol: (I'm not sure if that's true...but it sounds truthy. BTW I like Stoll....and Goose for that matter)
qwksndmonster Posted March 20, 2013 Author Report Posted March 20, 2013 Why exactly are they trading him? I've just sort of gotten used to hearing his name in trade rumors since last year. They also have 8 RFAs and 4 UFAs that they may want to resign. A lot of them are entry level deals, so they may want to save themselves the cap hit. EDIT: And just to demonstrate the kind of guy I want to go after.
SwampD Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 Stoll is a rich man's Guastad. 2 more goals a year on average. :lol: (I'm not sure if that's true...but it sounds truthy. BTW I like Stoll....and Goose for that matter) "Truthy" I like it.
todzilla Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 What are the chances of Armia being on the team next season, it seems like it's time. Vanek-Hodgson-Drouin (get him out there with the best players) Ennis-Griegorenko-Armia Foligno-Ott-Leino (still think Ville can be a help) Flynn-Girgensens-Tropp-Kaleta no more Stafford, Gerbe (boy if you could combine those 2 guys) Pommer. Myers-McNabb Ehrhoff-Sekera Pysyk-FA D, tough vet Miller Enroth I'd like to see Pommenville go at the deadline for picks/prospects, Stafford can go for a bag of pucks. I wouldn't be against Miller going for a top 6 forward or high picks/top propect and rolling the dice with Enroth and FA vet goalie.
Trettioåtta Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 Vanek (7.143 R) - Hodgson (3.5 R) - Pommers (5.3 R) Ennis (2.8 L) - Grigorenko (1.775 L) - Leino (4.5 L) Folingo (0.9 L) - Ott (2.95 L) - Armia (1.275 R) Miller (1.1 L) - Gordon (1.5 R) - Kaleta (1.086 R) Thompson (1.1 L) 7 Lefts, 6 Rights Total Cap: 33.7 Sekera (2.75 L) - Myers (5.5 R) Mcnabb (0.9 L) - Ehrhoff (4.0 L) Weber (1.3 L) - Pysyk (0.9 R) Sulzer (1 L) - O'Byrne (2 R) 5 Lefts, 3 Rights Total Cap: 18.4 Miller (6.25) Enroth (1.3) Total Cap: 7.5 Cap: 59.5 GM: Jim Nill (Detroit) Head Coach: Larry Robinson (San Jose PK - could be a huge help to Myers as well) Assistant Coaches: Tony Granato (Pittsburgh - Offense/PP), Patrick Roy (Quebec Remparts - defence) 2013 1st Round Pick: Barkov I really like Scuderi, but we have so many left handed D-men that it seems like a waste. But then I do love him, so decisions, decisions. I'm still not happy with this line-up - we have too many LW (Ott, Foligno, Ennis, Vanek, Leino). If Armia isn't ready, I'd move Ott to RW and get a new 3rd line centre
BMWR100RT Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 Cap: 59.5 Well thought out. So there's that!
Robviously Posted March 20, 2013 Report Posted March 20, 2013 bwahahahhaha http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I40HfH1UiXo&feature=youtu.be F that, I'm not giving up on Sabretooth.
X. Benedict Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 F that, I'm not giving up on Sabretooth. Is Dougy Allen a UFA next year? Maybe we could pick up a Salvation Army Singer and stay under the cap?
Two or less Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 Vanek (7.143 R) - Hodgson (3.5 R) - Pommers (5.3 R) Ennis (2.8 L) - Grigorenko (1.775 L) - Leino (4.5 L) Folingo (0.9 L) - Ott (2.95 L) - Armia (1.275 R) Miller (1.1 L) - Gordon (1.5 R) - Kaleta (1.086 R) Thompson (1.1 L) 7 Lefts, 6 Rights Total Cap: 33.7 Sekera (2.75 L) - Myers (5.5 R) Mcnabb (0.9 L) - Ehrhoff (4.0 L) Weber (1.3 L) - Pysyk (0.9 R) Sulzer (1 L) - O'Byrne (2 R) 5 Lefts, 3 Rights Total Cap: 18.4 Miller (6.25) Enroth (1.3) Total Cap: 7.5 Cap: 59.5 GM: Jim Nill (Detroit) Head Coach: Larry Robinson (San Jose PK - could be a huge help to Myers as well) Assistant Coaches: Tony Granato (Pittsburgh - Offense/PP), Patrick Roy (Quebec Remparts - defence) 2013 1st Round Pick: Barkov I really like Scuderi, but we have so many left handed D-men that it seems like a waste. But then I do love him, so decisions, decisions. I'm still not happy with this line-up - we have too many LW (Ott, Foligno, Ennis, Vanek, Leino). If Armia isn't ready, I'd move Ott to RW and get a new 3rd line centre congratulations, you've managed to build a even softer team then Darcy regier. didn't think it was possible.
Trettioåtta Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 congratulations, you've managed to build a even softer team then Darcy regier. didn't think it was possible. Define soft
Two or less Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 Define soft team toughness, not individual. fighting for the puck in the corners, battling in the offensive zone and only 2 of the 6 dmen are tough to play against. that's the big weakness this year, we're just too easy in our zone. when teams pepper us, it really takes a while for us to clear the puck. I like many of the adds you made (specifically miller and Gordon but that team would be too soft.
Trettioåtta Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 team toughness, not individual. fighting for the puck in the corners, battling in the offensive zone and only 2 of the 6 dmen are tough to play against. that's the big weakness this year, we're just too easy in our zone. when teams pepper us, it really takes a while for us to clear the puck. I like many of the adds you made (specifically miller and Gordon but that team would be too soft. One of the reasons I want Scuderi. The only move this team made over last season was Roy for Ott - this teams inability to clear the zone is new, so I think it is mostly in their heads. My bottom two lines have the ability to fight in the corners and be a good defensive lines. I'm also expecting Myers to be back on form, so that top line shouldn't need to battle in the corners too much. I think a lot of players can go into the corners, it is about a philosophy of doing the little dirty things as well as playing a solid game. Ruff's game was built around a run and gun - there was not much battling at either end of the boards. Rolston's is to let the opponent take as many shots as possible, but ensure those shots are from low scoring locations - also the trap, he loves it O'Bryne is also tough to play against, so a lot of the time he could/would be in
Two or less Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 One of the reasons I want Scuderi. The only move this team made over last season was Roy for Ott - this teams inability to clear the zone is new, so I think it is mostly in their heads. My bottom two lines have the ability to fight in the corners and be a good defensive lines. I'm also expecting Myers to be back on form, so that top line shouldn't need to battle in the corners too much. I think a lot of players can go into the corners, it is about a philosophy of doing the little dirty things as well as playing a solid game. Ruff's game was built around a run and gun - there was not much battling at either end of the boards. Rolston's is to let the opponent take as many shots as possible, but ensure those shots are from low scoring locations - also the trap, he loves it O'Bryne is also tough to play against, so a lot of the time he could/would be in without adding top-6 grit, the only guy there who remains as the only guy who is willing to go to the net is Vanek, which means he plays less with the puck at his stick but also he'll get hit and abused and eventually hurt, like every other season. Without any kind of toughness on the 2nd line, and in your proposal there is none, Ennis would never get enough space to be able to play his game. we'd be way too easy to play against. the RR style you described is a desperate brand of hockey, which awful teams use to give themselves a chance with a hot goaltender. our expectations should be higher.
Weave Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 What are the chances this team has 3 or 4 rookies on it next season? Could we be looking at a team with Grigorenko, Armia, Pysyk (or McNabb), and whoever we draft this year all in the lineup at the same time? Wow.
Robviously Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 What are the chances this team has 3 or 4 rookies on it next season? Could we be looking at a team with Grigorenko, Armia, Pysyk (or McNabb), and whoever we draft this year all in the lineup at the same time? Wow. It'll be Grigorenko, Pysyk, and McNabb for sure. I can't imagine Grigorenko being back in the Q, Pysyk looks like he's ready to start getting NHL experience, and it's probably time for McNabb to sink or swim in the NHL. I'd rather have Armia in Rochester (at least to start) and only Jones/Drouin/MacKinnon are draft picks that we'd play immediately (and I'm definitely skeptical that we'll get any of them). You have a good point though. Even having three rookies on the team all at once is going to be rough, especially with the team's leadership up in the air (i.e. maybe we're trading our captain and alternate captains).
Weave Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 It'll be Grigorenko, Pysyk, and McNabb for sure. I can't imagine Grigorenko being back in the Q, Pysyk looks like he's ready to start getting NHL experience, and it's probably time for McNabb to sink or swim in the NHL. I'd rather have Armia in Rochester (at least to start) and only Jones/Drouin/MacKinnon are draft picks that we'd play immediately (and I'm definitely skeptical that we'll get any of them). You have a good point though. Even having three rookies on the team all at once is going to be rough, especially with the team's leadership up in the air (i.e. maybe we're trading our captain and alternate captains). I know Armia is eligible to play in Rochester next season but he's in a league that is at a higher level of play than the AHL now. He may start in Rochester but if his game translates well in North America I don't see how he stays in Rochester for a full season.
Peppy22 Posted March 21, 2013 Report Posted March 21, 2013 congratulations, you've managed to build a even softer team then Darcy regier. didn't think it was possible. Thazs what I tried to adress with "my team". A clowe-ott-clarkson line would be awesome
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.