Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Those apartments should have a great view of the skyway.

 

Yeah, it's conveniently missing from that artist rendering...

Posted

WOW that center would be Awesome!!! IF it gets built i can drink at the game and have a place to stay at night.

 

Also this would generate business and familys to move to Buffalo. In turn maybe lure some potential FA. :thumbsup:

Posted

Love the Sabres' proposal. Total investment at 65% of what it cost to build FNC (in 2012 dollars).

 

I think Paladino's facade choices match the neighborhood better, but they also feel less distinctive than the Sabres' proposal.

 

Also this would generate business and familys to move to Buffalo. In turn maybe lure some potential FA. :thumbsup:

 

And yes, as a recreational hockey player who's open to moving back to the Buffalo area, the prospect of a new double sheet downtown only makes me want move there more.

Posted

Those apartments should have a great view of the skyway.

If Buffalo ever wants to have a really great waterfront, the Skyway is going to have to come down.

 

Both concepts look great. I like the Sabres' better because it's a little more distinct and because I have more faith in Pegula than I do in Carl Paladino. Hopefully we get this done quickly; it'll be great for Buffalo and even better when we're hosting March Madness or (hopefully) another World Juniors.

 

Side note: This was also going to be the location of the doomed Adelphia Tower, right?

Posted

If Buffalo ever wants to have a really great waterfront, the Skyway is going to have to come down.

 

Both concepts look great. I like the Sabres' better because it's a little more distinct and because I have more faith in Pegula than I do in Carl Paladino. Hopefully we get this done quickly; it'll be great for Buffalo and even better when we're hosting March Madness or (hopefully) another World Juniors.

 

Side note: This was also going to be the location of the doomed Adelphia Tower, right?

Knowing the city can never get out of its own way, I am convinced they will choose Crazy Carl, Pegula becomes pissed off, and shys away from any future waterfront opportunites.

Posted

Knowing the city can never get out of its own way, I am convinced they will choose Crazy Carl, Pegula becomes pissed off, and shys away from any future waterfront opportunites.

 

How's Larry Quinn doing?

 

I'm sure a few people will walk away with envelopes as they run up Uncle Terry.

Posted

How's Larry Quinn doing?

 

I'm sure a few people will walk away with envelopes as they run up Uncle Terry.

 

Sigh, I won't even bother to ask if you have some proof of bribery.

Posted

If Buffalo ever wants to have a really great waterfront, the Skyway is going to have to come down.

 

Both concepts look great. I like the Sabres' better because it's a little more distinct and because I have more faith in Pegula than I do in Carl Paladino. Hopefully we get this done quickly; it'll be great for Buffalo and even better when we're hosting March Madness or (hopefully) another World Juniors.

 

Side note: This was also going to be the location of the doomed Adelphia Tower, right?

 

Actually, the Skyway is bad enough, but then you have the Marine Drive Apartments - those are ugly buildings and they block the view of the Inner Harbor at least as much as, if not more than the Skyway does. In a perfect world, both of these would be gone. Knowing Buffalo, we'll be seeing them for years to come.

 

Both Webster Block proposals look good - if I had to choose, I'd go with the twin ice rinks. Knowing that available ice time around Buffalo is always in short supply, putting these in would guarantee increased activity at the foot of Main Street. But whichever one is chosen, PLEASE actually build the thing! We've had too many years of having our hopes raised, only to be dashed upon the rocks of local politics.

Posted

Actually, the Skyway is bad enough, but then you have the Marine Drive Apartments - those are ugly buildings and they block the view of the Inner Harbor at least as much as, if not more than the Skyway does. In a perfect world, both of these would be gone. Knowing Buffalo, we'll be seeing them for years to come.

 

Both Webster Block proposals look good - if I had to choose, I'd go with the twin ice rinks. Knowing that available ice time around Buffalo is always in short supply, putting these in would guarantee increased activity at the foot of Main Street. But whichever one is chosen, PLEASE actually build the thing! We've had too many years of having our hopes raised, only to be dashed upon the rocks of local politics.

Having subsidized housing on the waterfront(Marine Drive Apartments) is way worse than the skyway.

 

The skyway...I know it is a longer route to downtown without it, but there is plenty of access to the 90 from Hamburg and points south. If you really want that straight shot, take Rte. 5 in, and then hop on Ohio St. to downtown. The more that gets developed underneath and around the skyway, the less likely it is ever to come down.

Posted

Actually, the Skyway is bad enough, but then you have the Marine Drive Apartments - those are ugly buildings and they block the view of the Inner Harbor at least as much as, if not more than the Skyway does. In a perfect world, both of these would be gone. Knowing Buffalo, we'll be seeing them for years to come.

 

Both Webster Block proposals look good - if I had to choose, I'd go with the twin ice rinks. Knowing that available ice time around Buffalo is always in short supply, putting these in would guarantee increased activity at the foot of Main Street. But whichever one is chosen, PLEASE actually build the thing! We've had too many years of having our hopes raised, only to be dashed upon the rocks of local politics.

 

I agree that both projects look good, but I'd go for the Sabres proposal for a few reasons.

 

1) It's actually a unique destination and a reason to go into the city. As somebody who has lived in the suburbs for my entire life, I rarely have a reason to go into the city. Give me one, and I will! More office space and apartments that I can't afford aren't going to get me there.

 

2) Does the city really need more office space? Seriously, especially with HSBC moving out, I can't imagine a reason why we need to pour tens of millions into new office space when the city can't fill the space it currently has.

 

3) If the Sabres get the bid, I have faith it will actually get done. Maybe it's blind faith in Pegula, but I think he's demonstrated that when he gets involved, things get done. Paladino sometimes gets things done, but he also has other properties with which he's done the equivalent of nothing.

 

In sum I think the Sabres' proposal gives people a reason to go into the city who otherwise wouldn't, and it's just a really cool concept, whereas the Paladino proposal strikes me as more of the same, only newer. What does this mean? The visionaries in city hall will crunch the numbers, see the Paladino proposal is cheaper, and go with it :wallbash:

Posted

Having subsidized housing on the waterfront(Marine Drive Apartments) is way worse than the skyway.

 

The skyway...I know it is a longer route to downtown without it, but there is plenty of access to the 90 from Hamburg and points south. If you really want that straight shot, take Rte. 5 in, and then hop on Ohio St. to downtown. The more that gets developed underneath and around the skyway, the less likely it is ever to come down.

 

Ohio Street to Michigan Ave. is (to me) preferable to the Skyway. Nothing worse than perking along at 55 MPH and then hitting the traffic signal at the foot of the Skyway. I only use the Skyway when I want to stop at Starbucks on Delaware on the way into work (which lately hasn't been very often at all).

Posted

Sigh, I won't even bother to ask if you have some proof of bribery.

 

I'm just laughing at the setup. Quinn is partners with Paladino on many projects. Quinn hired 90% of the people working inside of the arena who are putting the proposal together with the Sabres. The city is the city and wouldn't close an open window in the middle of January if they found it.

 

All those expecting a 100% perfectly legit and efficient process....please raise your hands.

Posted

I actually don't have a problem with the Skyway aesthetically. It has, perhaps, the best view of the area outside of getting into one of the taller buildings. When I was a reporter, I saw the proposal to replace the Skyway with a tunnel...a particularly ambitious project and very costly. I would rather that money go towards developing/cleaning up near by areas.

Posted

I actually don't have a problem with the Skyway aesthetically. It has, perhaps, the best view of the area outside of getting into one of the taller buildings. When I was a reporter, I saw the proposal to replace the Skyway with a tunnel...a particularly ambitious project and very costly. I would rather that money go towards developing/cleaning up near by areas.

 

i've sort of given up on my anti-skyway credentials. i am more a fan of the mantra "lighter, quicker, cheaper" (or whatever it is) that is now guiding canalside development. removing and replacing the skyway would be a massive undertaking -- better to use that money elsewhere. the turning point for me was going to the concerts at canalside; when the sun is setting, the harbor is behind you, the band you like is on stage, and you're feeling a pleasant blue light buzz, the skyway just ... blends innocuously into the background. it's not the obstacle to development and beautification that i once imagined/assumed it to be.

Posted

I actually don't have a problem with the Skyway aesthetically. It has, perhaps, the best view of the area outside of getting into one of the taller buildings. When I was a reporter, I saw the proposal to replace the Skyway with a tunnel...a particularly ambitious project and very costly. I would rather that money go towards developing/cleaning up near by areas.

 

It's probably be easier to put in a new highway from Smith St (give or take) and connect down past Tift. Looking at the satellite map, there doesn't seem to be a ton of stuff in the way.

Posted

i've sort of given up on my anti-skyway credentials. i am more a fan of the mantra "lighter, quicker, cheaper" (or whatever it is) that is now guiding canalside development. removing and replacing the skyway would be a massive undertaking -- better to use that money elsewhere. the turning point for me was going to the concerts at canalside; when the sun is setting, the harbor is behind you, the band you like is on stage, and you're feeling a pleasant blue light buzz, the skyway just ... blends innocuously into the background. it's not the obstacle to development and beautification that i once imagined/assumed it to be.

 

It is kind of weird seeing a semi barreling down the skyway as the band plays on stage though.

Posted
It is kind of weird seeing a semi barreling down the skyway as the band plays on stage though.

 

i hear you. it has also crossed my mind, from time to time, that the reportedly higher relative incidence of accidents on that elevated expressway has the potential to affect/impact the environs below.

 

Posted (edited)

I'm slowly getting used to the skyway. It isn't as bad as I once thought it was, and it somehow gives it a distinct urban feel when I'm down at the harbor. We'll see if I still think that when canalside is completed, though.

Edited by sabills
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...