bunomatic Posted July 20, 2013 Report Posted July 20, 2013 haha and I thought everyone was just joking around! The madness And thats why you're not a mod. ;)
nfreeman Posted July 20, 2013 Report Posted July 20, 2013 Dear me. I vote for reinstating GoDD and, crucially, not taking his posts in this thread too seriously. GCOE -- I really don't think he called you a pedophile. Separately, I think Z is going to have a much better year than Griggy this season.
Andrew Amerk Posted July 20, 2013 Report Posted July 20, 2013 Dear me. I vote for reinstating GoDD and, crucially, not taking his posts in this thread too seriously. I still don't see what the issue is/was. It's just a message board.
SDS Posted July 20, 2013 Report Posted July 20, 2013 I'm not sure what the problem is/was. I've seen posts that go beyond that in attacks that get real personal for a simple difference of opinion. Personally I wouldn't have searched out the meaning of the offending term but the link presented itself. Disgusting no doubt but no worse than some of the sexual innuendo thats all too common to this site. I'm more offended by the sight of men in drag. But thats just me. To each his own. Isolated incidents are different from continuous patterns...
Bullwinkle III Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 Just out of curiosity, what does any of this stuff have to do with Girgensons?
Andrew Amerk Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 Just out of curiosity, what does any of this stuff have to do with Girgensons? Apparently, Girgs cross-dresses in his free time, and a pic posted of this caused a quarrel.
Bullwinkle III Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 Apparently, Girgs cross-dresses in his free time, and a pic posted of this caused a quarrel. Are you serious???
WildCard Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 I still don't see what the issue is/was. It's just a message board. On a related note, I'm curious as to what earns a "warning point"/ban on this forum. Any specific criteria or is it just subject to personal interpretation? I like the crazy. If I wanted impersonal, boring analysis I'd go elsewhere. This forum has a personality, and it's great; kinda like shootin the ###### with my buddies, just with people who actually know hockey.
Andrew Amerk Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 Are you serious??? Is the pic or ensuing argument that followed serious? Someone got temporarily banned over it...
inkman Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 Are you serious??? ...and in said quarrel the aforementioned suspended poster drew a direct line between posting a pic of Girgs and friends dressed as chicks to Jerry Sandusky. So yes, IMHO ban worthy.
deluca67 Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 young men that age have been doing weird, silly sh!t since before you or i were born. difference being: nowadays, there's always a device around ready to capture the moment. also worth noting that there's a european influence afoot here -- giving rise to bonus points for weirdness. I guess we grew up in different neighborhoods. That was a very creepy photo, Girgensons looks like the guy form Silence of the Lambs when he is dancing in front of the mirror. Opinions of the photo would be much different if Girgensons was a Bruins draft pick, this thread would be up to 1,000 posts drilling on the Bruins and no one would have an issue with references to Sandusky or Soggy Biscuits. The hypocrisy on this board at times is pathetic. ...and in said quarrel the aforementioned suspended poster drew a direct line between posting a pic of Girgs and friends dressed as chicks to Jerry Sandusky. So yes, IMHO ban worthy. And you haven't posted 100 more disturbing references over the years? :censored:
Lanny Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 My best guess is that it's rookie hazing ("rookie dinner").
SwampD Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 My best guess is that it's rookie hazing ("rookie dinner"). Mine too, although, if it isn't, I still don't care.
darksabre Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 My best guess is that it's rookie hazing ("rookie dinner"). That's exactly what it was. And it. was hilarious.
shrader Posted July 21, 2013 Report Posted July 21, 2013 I'm not really sure why the picture was posted in the first place and I'm not really sure why it was even comment worthy.
LGR4GM Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 Apparently most people didn't do anything fun or crazy when they were 18,19,20's but some people have fun.
nobody Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 While I understand the background of the image being a few years old and the kids being kids thought process; I do have to side in the general sense with GoDD on this. I believe that Girgensons may have just recently posted this picture to his instagram site. As he is now part of the NHL I think he does have to think more about social issues of the day and what an image may be perceived as. Especially now with the NHL teaming with the You Can Play Project to teach players about equality.
spndnchz Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Posted July 22, 2013 While I understand the background of the image being a few years old and the kids being kids thought process; I do have to side in the general sense with GoDD on this. I believe that Girgensons may have just recently posted this picture to his instagram site. As he is now part of the NHL I think he does have to think more about social issues of the day and what an image may be perceived as. Especially now with the NHL teaming with the You Can Play Project to teach players about equality. Or he was just having some funs with his bros and didn't need to be linked to a pedophile. You can play has nothing to do with pedophilia.
IKnowPhysics Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 You can play has nothing to do with pedophilia. Wait. Who linked You Can Play with pederasses?
nobody Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 Or he was just having some funs with his bros and didn't need to be linked to a pedophile. You can play has nothing to do with pedophilia. I did say 'in the general sense' I sided with him. Sensitivity is sensitvity no matter what it pertains to. The NHL has dealt with sexual abuse in the past with the Theo Fleury/Sheldon Kennedy case and they are now dealing with equality through the You Can Play Project. I believe the NHL expects the players to think a bit more about social issues.
IKnowPhysics Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 5 minute major for Asshattery and a 10 minute game misconduct.
Eleven Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 Wait. Who linked You Can Play with pederasses? Pederasts.
LTS Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 Interesting. This is a great example of what makes me want to stick around. Am I the only one who finds crazy eminently entertaining? I get enough crazy elsewhere. I think that's the problem for me. :)
nobody Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 I get enough crazy elsewhere. I think that's the problem for me. :) Well you do live in the land of Unicorns and Rainbows.
skaught Posted July 22, 2013 Report Posted July 22, 2013 I take it a lot of you have never gone to a theater for the Rocky Horror Picture Show... The best part is when you go back to your friends house to find that you locked your keys in the car. The face on the tow truck driver was priceless...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.