plenzmd1 Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 I hate to say this..but seems to me ever sinse that bar fight Kassian has not been the same player. I don't know if that knocked some of the "wild" out of him, he just seems out of sorts on the ice... not the same guy the sabres drafted. Maybe his life his better, but his hockey has suffered. Now, I watch zero Western confernece except when we play them...so I have no idea if this is good or bad trade...but I am not crushed kassian is leaving
Iron Crotch Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Maybe Joel Armia, who (according to Hockey's Future) is our top overall organizational prospect, makes Kassian more expendable. Joel has more offensive upside than Kassian. And, as others have pointed out, we can get the size elsewhere. But, no one can argue that we weren't badly in need of a young center who can score.
Ross Rhea Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 This is an absolutely false statement. I team full of players with 80pt potential or a team full of players who may be physical... hmmm IMHO Kassian will pan out to be a strong (not physical) 50pt a year rw similar to stafford and Hodgson will be a 70pt a year 2way player akin to Pommers... LOVE THIS TRADE STILL nothing false about it, it's my opinion. after watching boston and philly the past couple of years, i believe it to be true.
Randall Flagg Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 I recall watching a Vancouver game recently and hoping for Hodgson, or a top center prospect like him. At least we have a solid foundation for hope for the next few seasons, center wise, and props to Darcy for today. It was a good day, good enough for me to not be upset at giving him the summer to work.
Trettioåtta Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 I really wanted us to draft Hodgie in 08, now he is hear, i am psyched. Ennis Vanek Leino Adam Stafford Roy Gerbe Hodgie 'Boyes' 'Hecht' That list could use some trimming, which gives us some chips to play with (along with our extra draft picks). We can pick up a solid few players and i am hoping for a Leino rebound season next year, which would help. First positive thing that has happened all season :) That
Eleven Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 That doesn't mean it's not the preferred "style of game" of some Sabre fans. Understood, but I'd prefer that the front office plan for 7/8 of the season and not 1/8.
darksabre Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 This addition of Hodgson also really cements one thing: The Leino Center Experiment is officially over. 1
Robviously Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Maybe Joel Armia, who (according to Hockey's Future) is our top overall organizational prospect, makes Kassian more expendable. Joel has more offensive upside than Kassian. And, as others have pointed out, we can get the size elsewhere. But, no one can argue that we weren't badly in need of a young center who can score. The two players could not be more different. Armia is all finesse, Kassian is all size and strength.
LGR4GM Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 nothing false about it, it's my opinion. after watching boston and philly the past couple of years, i believe it to be true. philly has not won anything and boston won because they had the best goalie...
deluca67 Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Understood, but I'd prefer that the front office plan for 7/8 of the season and not 1/8. It's not about the opponent game. It's about how that opponent looks at your team. Would you disagree that teams would be a bit more tense going into a game against the Bruins and Flyers than they would be the Sabres. I think that goes a long way.
Ross Rhea Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 philly has not won anything and boston won because they had the best goalie... they both beat the hell out of the sabres didnt they?
rickshaw Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Hodgson sees the ice so well. He's gets the least amount of ice yet has 33 pts He has played with almost everyone and still puts up points. He got 30 secs pp time. He can play. But he's not fast nor huge. The coach never warmed to CH. He can play. The nucks needed a big guy to keep others honest. Sulzer is a solid player. Shocked but happy yet not happy. Vanek keep your stick on the ice cuz the kid will find you. Gonna be fun this sat. Lookin fwd to it
Eleven Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 It's not about the opponent game. It's about how that opponent looks at your team. Would you disagree that teams would be a bit more tense going into a game against the Bruins and Flyers than they would be the Sabres. I think that goes a long way. Score more goals and no one cares how tough you are. I recognize that team toughness is a problem. I also recognize that lack of scoring is a much bigger problem. 1
Taro T Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Who would rather have, a #1 center or Lucic? I'll take Lucic. Interesting comparison. You are putting up the generic term '#1 center' and comparing him to arguably the best power forward in the game currently. (At a minimum, he's the power forward that gets the most respect around here.) If the #1 center is Stamkos, it's a no brainer. If the #1 center is Roy, again, it's a no brainer. If it's someone in between, it gets grayer. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming that Kassian will fully develop and reach Lucic's level. 1
Formerly Allan in MD Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Hodgson is very fast and has a really quick and accurate shot. I'll take it. Kassian's upside appears to be questionable at this point. That said, we do need strength up front. Is Foligno ready?
shrader Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) You forgot one. Back to back drafts that land Hodgson, Myers, Ennis, Adam, McNabb, and Foligno (the last three still being slightly longer shots). That's how you build a hockey team. Now if you can follow that up by having guys like Pysyk, Gauthier-Leduc, Sundher, and Armia pan out, things get that much better. Edited February 27, 2012 by shrader 1
Ross Rhea Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Score more goals and no one cares how tough you are. I recognize that team toughness is a problem. I also recognize that lack of scoring is a much bigger problem. hard to score goals when the other team beats you up and intimidates you and there is nothing you can do about it
LGR4GM Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 they both beat the hell out of the sabres didnt they? no. Philly went to game 7 and the only reason we were in the playoffs against boston was ryan miller... toughness matters yes but its not the end all.
nobody Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Now if we can just get the league to start calling the obstruction penalty again...
Taro T Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Back to back drafts that land Hodgson, Myers, Ennis, Adam, McNabb, and Foligno (the last three still being slightly longer shots). That's how you build a hockey team. Now if you can follow that up by having guys like Pysyk, Gauthier-Leduc, Sundher, and Armia pan out, things get that much better. And all those coming in the era of 'video scouting.' I don't know that the bottom of the draft has been effected since the scouting has been revamped, but the top end seems to have picked up.
LGR4GM Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 hard to score goals when the other team beats you up and intimidates you and there is nothing you can do about it I cant agree with this. I would argue Pitts, Detroit, Carolina, and Chicago won because of their offense not brute toughness.
nucci Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 I'm really hoping this trade means the Sabres are totally sold on Marcus Foligno's NHL future. If not, we might be the softest team in the league. We already are.
Ross Rhea Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 no. Philly went to game 7 and the only reason we were in the playoffs against boston was ryan miller... toughness matters yes but its not the end all. and who has been more productive in the playoffs, finesse style or rugged style? i say the latter. how has buffalos style done lately?
Claude Balls Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 Well I won't be upset if the Sabres miss the playoffs this year. How would this team fare against the toughness of Philly, NYR or Boston now? Glad we got some possible talent at center, but this team may as well play in skirts for the remainder of the year. One can only hope that Finley and Gongalsky can somehow make it to the NHL someday. I think Foligno, McNabb and Tropp can add some toughness down the line, but as of now this team has to be the softest bunch of guys in the league by far.
korab rules Posted February 27, 2012 Report Posted February 27, 2012 That wasn't me. I actually started a contest and you could tell what I thought the chances were of certain guys getting moved. Really? You've been banging the drum that Darcy would stand pat and stick with status quo for a month.
Recommended Posts