TheChimp Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 That's twice tonight RJ's fooled me into thinking Miller saved one
biodork Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 You started the post with the wrong word, apparently. ? And WTF is with Miller's 2 slow-mo save duffs? Ugh.
LGR4GM Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 My 3 players of excellence tonight: 3) Mike Weber, he played smart and had some good physical play and some good chances in the zone 2) Tyler Myers, a goal and some quality play including some signs of aggression 1) Tyler Ennis, a goal and a whole lot of just great plays throughout, kid. is. special. and now I am logging off before all the haters show up.
... Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 I don't see why they bothered taking this game to overtime.
Eleven Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Bunch of crap-ass Jheri-Curl-using, leather-jacket-sporting, French-speaking bee-yotches leaving my home arena happy. Dammit.
TheChimp Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Listen to those Habs fans, Terry!!!
Robviously Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 I don't see why they bothered taking this game to overtime. Let's just be happy we got 1 point instead of 2.
itbeatswalking Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Kane for miller. PULL IT OFFFFFFFFF
Bmwolf21 Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 There is literally nothing to like about Derek Roy's game right now. Nothing. My 3 players of excellence tonight: 3) Mike Weber, he played smart and had some good physical play and some good chances in the zone 2) Tyler Myers, a goal and some quality play including some signs of aggression 1) Tyler Ennis, a goal and a whole lot of just great plays throughout, kid. is. special. and now I am logging off before all the haters show up. Swap out Sekera for Weber and I'd agree.
Oakstream Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 4 losses in a row. Goal difference 7-16. Boy the deadline can't come fast enough. Give us a new team!!!
Robviously Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Kane for miller. PULL IT OFFFFFFFFF No, Miller is too awesome. And this team is close to winning the Cup. Just wait 'til they get healthy. /DarcyLogic
papazoid Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 I can't fathom what he would be being punished for. Then again for being our best player, he still only gets 17-18mins of ice time each game. i agree...vanek (17:05) should get more minutes.....just for discussion purposes.....tampa's stamkos averages 21:23 and st. louis 21:59...pit's malkin 21:23 and staal 20:15.....philly's giroux 21:44.....toews 21:51...i could go on. thats almost a 25% increase in ice time, which pro rated give him 5 more goals.
TheChimp Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 So can someone tell me the names of the top three or four players to look up on HFboards to see who I want us to draft? I'm woefully ignorant about who is out there.
Randall Flagg Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 i agree...vanek (17:05) should get more minutes.....just for discussion purposes.....tampa's stamkos averages 21:23 and st. louis 21:59...pit's malkin 21:23 and staal 20:15.....philly's giroux 21:44.....toews 21:51...i could go on. thats almost a 25% increase in ice time, which pro rated give him 5 more goals. Vanek is not at their level, but I would agree with giving our best player 20 minutes, and whole 2:00 chunks on power plays.
kishoph Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 It was Pommer, Roy, Vanek, and Myers, no? He did leave Ennis out; I would have, too. Roy came on for the PP, the pressure was being put on before that with Regehr, Reggie, Pommers and Ennis, the only time Roy was with Pommers in the OT was on the PP, the other shifts is was Ennis with Pommers.
JJFIVEOH Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Lindy, you've got to be ###### kidding me?!?! Boyes, Stafford, Roy are all completely invisible and have been for months and you pick VANEK to bench to send a message because of his penalty!?!?!?! You really need to get your priorities straight. Why the hell does he insist on calling out players who are actually putting in an effort and completely overlook the sluffs?
Who Else? Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Lindy, you've got to be ###### kidding me?!?! Boyes, Stafford, Roy are all completely invisible and have been for months and you pick VANEK to bench to send a message because of his penalty!?!?!?! You really need to get your priorities straight. Amen!
itbeatswalking Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 I'm a diehard fan. When pegula took over, I thought this would be the year that everybody looked back at and said "wow, we really went far", and actually mean it. But now, it's looking like I'm going to have to settle for them saying it sarcastically.
LGR4GM Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 wanna know whats great about this game? A) It was entertaining B) I could watch it C) It was close but we lost in the end keeping our chances at Grigorenko alive!
Randall Flagg Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Stinko for Grigorenko. If we cant get him, clusterfukc for galchenyuk!
OverPowerYou Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 This ones for all you Rochester area folk: I went to an Rit Tigers hockey game, it was my 2nd one in 3 months. They are by far 5x more exciting, fast paced, and hard hitting than the sabres. Even though the game ended in a 2-2 tie it was probably better than watching the sabres any day of the week
JohnRobertEichel Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 If we cant get him, clusterfukc for galchenyuk! :w00t:
bunomatic Posted February 18, 2012 Report Posted February 18, 2012 Vanek is not at their level, but I would agree with giving our best player 20 minutes, and whole 2:00 chunks on power plays. With a top flight centre and that kind of icetime Vanek would be right in there with them. IMO
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.