Jump to content

Trivia time...


Eleven

Recommended Posts

Posted

And TRY to answer without google...

 

Entering the 2011-2012 season, the Montreal Canadiens are the winningest franchise in NHL history, with a .590 percentage. Who are second and third?

 

EDIT: Winning as a percentage, not total wins. Otherwise, it would have to be the 80-100-year old franchises.

Posted

Bold guess...Philly and yooooouuur Buffalo Sabres??

 

Yep. With Boston behind by a tenth of one percent.

 

I was STUNNED to learn that earlier in the week and had to wait until the weekend to confirm by looking it up in the official NHL Guide. But yeah, it's the third-winningest team in NHL history. I would have figured somewhere in the middle of the pack.

 

Now, the Buffalo Bills, on the other hand...

Posted

Yep. With Boston behind by a tenth of one percent.

 

I was STUNNED to learn that earlier in the week and had to wait until the weekend to confirm by looking it up in the official NHL Guide. But yeah, it's the third-winningest team in history. I would have figured somewhere in the middle of the pack.

 

Now, the Buffalo Bills, on the other hand...

Do you have a link?

Posted

Do you have a link?

 

It's a book. But what got me started was this quiz from Wednesday: http://www.sporcle.com/games/puckett86/best-team

 

I was really surprised by it, and given the somewhat inherent unreliability of sporcle quizzes, I wanted to check it before posting anything about it. I would suspect that at present, Boston has overtaken Buffalo given the extremely slim margin between the two teams heading into the season.

Posted

It's a book. But what got me started was this quiz from Wednesday: http://www.sporcle.c...ett86/best-team

 

I was really surprised by it, and given the somewhat inherent unreliability of sporcle quizzes, I wanted to check it before posting anything about it. I would suspect that at present, Boston has overtaken Buffalo given the extremely slim margin between the two teams heading into the season.

I would like to see the numbers, I am surprised I am not able to see them online anywhere.

 

This is interesting, from a article Sept 2010

 

Teams that have more “Goals For” than “Goals Against” in their history.

  1. Montreal Canadiens +3,520
  2. Boston Bruins +1,532
  3. Philadelphia Flyers +1,445
  4. Buffalo Sabres +989
  5. Detroit Red Wings +850
  6. Calgary Flames +532
  7. Edmonton Oilers +448
  8. Colorado Avalanche +220
  9. New York Islanders +203

Posted

I would like to see the numbers, I am surprised I am not able to see them online anywhere.

 

This is interesting, from a article Sept 2010

 

Teams that have more “Goals For” than “Goals Against” in their history.

  1. Montreal Canadiens +3,520
  2. Boston Bruins +1,532
  3. Philadelphia Flyers +1,445
  4. Buffalo Sabres +989
  5. Detroit Red Wings +850
  6. Calgary Flames +532
  7. Edmonton Oilers +448
  8. Colorado Avalanche +220
  9. New York Islanders +203

 

 

Also surprising.

 

EDIT: You can take the quiz and "give up" about 20 seconds in to see the numbers there. Or you can take this much sadder quiz: http://www.sporcle.com/games/TheBigE1980/winningest_teams_to_never_win_a_title

Posted

And TRY to answer without google...

 

Entering the 2011-2012 season, the Montreal Canadiens are the winningest franchise in NHL history, with a .590 percentage. Who are second and third?

 

EDIT: Winning as a percentage, not total wins. Otherwise, it would have to be the 80-100-year old franchises.

 

I wanted to give this an honest effort without googling or reading anyone else's posts, so...... I'm going to go with San Jose (pretty confident with this one) and... Dallas?

 

Edit: .......oops!

 

Edit again: I was trying to find the answer via google just now and found this sporcle quiz, which gets you the results for the top seven nhl teams... http://www.sporcle.com/games/nrs/winningest They've got Boston ahead of Buffalo, by the way!

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Fun little trivia fact I came across just now......

 

 

Name the former Buffalo Sabre who had an on-ice fight with both Lindy Ruff AND Darcy Regier...............

 

I found it. But I had to cheat.

Posted

I had no idea and don't expect anyone to off hand. Darcy had 3 career fights and he probably doesn't know.

 

I was surprised to see Darcy had a few tussles

Gerry Meehan?

Posted

Fun little trivia fact I came across just now......

 

 

Name the former Buffalo Sabre who had an on-ice fight with both Lindy Ruff AND Darcy Regier...............

 

How exactly did you come across this one? That takes randomness to a whole new level.

Posted

How exactly did you come across this one? That takes randomness to a whole new level.

 

The answer is: Pat Hughes

 

I'll tell you how. With watching the playoffs and all the grit and size going on, and some of our longstanding observations that the Sabres lack both and Darcy has no clue........I wondered if Darcy was a total puss as a player. I looked up his stats and was surprised to see he had a few years in the minors with 100 penalty minutes. There had to be some fights sprinkled in there to get that many. Since he only played a few dozen games in the NHL, I was assuming he never had to fight....but was shocked to see he had 3 fights in the NHL. Not bad. So my next step was to see who he fought.....I couldn't find any video footage, but found the names. I wanted to know if it was a Daniel Briere/ Kyle Turris type of partner, or guys who actually had some toughness. Pat Hughes came up and he was ok in a tussle. I looked up who he had fought over the years and he took on some heavyweights, and that is where I saw he fought Lindy Ruff. I figured that was interesting enough information to relay here given the lack of actual activity.

 

So you see......it wasn't random. I had an idea, and a hypothesis....and I researched it.....and there was enough information to strike down my thought that Darcy was a puss on the ice as well, and in researching found some other interesting information. The less I know about something that peaks my curiosity, the deeper I dig. If something doesn't make sense....there's usually a reason. You don't always find definitive answers along the way, but you close some doors, and open others. I guess, pretty much like your job.....except I'm not trying to cure terminal illness....just terminal ignorance.

 

So there's a look into my thought process. Sorry to disappoint anyone who thought I just didn't have good enough insuarance to cover my psych meds.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...