Jump to content

2011-2012 Amerks Thread


LabattBlue

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yep that or theahl.com.

Thanks. WE HAVE PLAYOFFS!!!! :w00t:

 

.....er....no wait....not yet huh. I just checked their site....four teams COULD pass us and we'd be in 9th.....

 

...er, no. We have at least 8th...Houston has fewer wins even if they win today...

Posted

Thanks. WE HAVE PLAYOFFS!!!! :w00t:

 

.....er....no wait....not yet huh. I just checked their site....four teams COULD pass us and we'd be in 9th.....

 

...er, no. We have at least 8th...Houston has fewer wins even if they win today...

 

This is what Rochester needs, courtesy of theahl.com's playoff primer:

 

Rochester clinches a playoff berth on Sunday with:

(a) a San Antonio regulation loss vs. Oklahoma City, OR

(b) a regulation decision in the Charlotte-Milwaukee game, OR

[c] a Houston loss (reg/OT/SO) or win by fewer than 9 goals vs. Texas

 

 

http://theahl.com/pl...f-primer-s13201

Posted

Rochester clinches a playoff berth on Sunday with:

(a) a San Antonio regulation loss vs. Oklahoma City, OR

(b) a regulation decision in the Charlotte-Milwaukee game, OR

[c] a Houston loss (reg/OT/SO) or win by fewer than 9 goals vs. Texas

I know they can't officially call them in but come on...

Posted

I know they can't officially call them in but come on...

 

I know, right? Houston hasn't scored more than 7 goals in a game this year. If they managed to win by more than 9 tonight Rochester should demand an investigation of the Texas franchise.

Posted

Yup! I thought they were in anyways, as Houston couldn't match them in Wins even with a victory today, but this pretty much settles it. YEEE HAWWWW! :w00t:

 

Win total is irrelevant - the first tiebreaker is Regulation/OT wins, and with a W today Houston and Rochester both would have had 30 regulation/OT wins. Next tiebreaker is points in the season series, and they played twice with the teams splitting regulation wins, so the next tiebreaker is goal differential. That's where the nine-goal differential tiebreaker came in.

Posted

Win total is irrelevant - the first tiebreaker is Regulation/OT wins, and with a W today Houston and Rochester both would have had 30 regulation/OT wins. Next tiebreaker is points in the season series, and they played twice with the teams splitting regulation wins, so the next tiebreaker is goal differential. That's where the nine-goal differential tiebreaker came in.

Gotcha. Thanks!

 

PLAYOFFS!!!!! :w00t:

Posted

Gotcha. Thanks!

 

PLAYOFFS!!!!! :w00t:

 

No prob. It was a tight Western Conference playoff race right till the end - spots 5-10 were all in the hunt up until the second-to-last day of the season, and on the final day five teams were vying for three spots.

Posted

Bring on the Marlies!! Lookin at you Kadri, Orr, Colborne, Finger and Lashoff!!

 

PLEASE post the sked as soon as it's available. I still have this notion of meeting you, d4rk, and DaveB for a game.

Posted

PLEASE post the sked as soon as it's available. I still have this notion of meeting you, d4rk, and DaveB for a game.

 

Western Conference Quarterfinals – Series “F” (best-of-5)

2-Toronto Marlies vs. 7-Rochester Americans

Game 1 – Thu., Apr. 19 – Rochester at Toronto, 7:00

Game 2 – Sat., Apr. 21 – Rochester at Toronto, 3:00

Game 3 – Mon., Apr. 23 – Toronto at Rochester, 7:05

*Game 4 – Wed., Apr. 25 – Toronto at Rochester, 7:05

*Game 5 – Sat., Apr. 28 – Rochester at Toronto, 3:00

 

 

 

 

 

http://theahl.com/first-round-playoff-schedules-announced-p177075-preview-1

Posted

Western Conference Quarterfinals – Series “F” (best-of-5)

2-Toronto Marlies vs. 7-Rochester Americans

Game 1 – Thu., Apr. 19 – Rochester at Toronto, 7:00

Game 2 – Sat., Apr. 21 – Rochester at Toronto, 3:00

Game 3 – Mon., Apr. 23 – Toronto at Rochester, 7:05

*Game 4 – Wed., Apr. 25 – Toronto at Rochester, 7:05

*Game 5 – Sat., Apr. 28 – Rochester at Toronto, 3:00

 

 

 

Wolf, are you in?

 

I think I could make that Monday game if all the pieces fall into place.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...