Weave Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 I wonder if there's a poll on the Vancouver boards about whether Luongo or Schneider should start Game 5. I'll bet not. Not quite a Luongo or Schneider should start thread but it's along the same lines. Thread title - Game 5 will be Lu's career if he chokes thats it Fans are pretty much the same everywhere. Even the logic for and against Luongo's performance sounds eerily similar. And, like here, a couple posters take a controversial position and the rest of the community jumps like its 5 times the number in agreement. Gawd I luv the interweb.
Formerly Allan in MD Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 No matter who is in goal, your not going to win unless you cut down on the turnovers and eliminate the dumb penalties.
Samson's Flow Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 I don't really know if there was a time in the third game that I said "wow that was a soft goal". In fact the only time I did say that was on Gerbe's goal off the big rebound from Boucher. If we can find a happy balance between the game 1 defense first game and the last few where the D was a bit too freewheeling and giveaway prone then I think we will be alright. Enroth will have his time, it's just not right now. Lets not rush him into the fray just for the sake of change.
LGR4GM Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 PUT IN ENROTH PUT IN ENROTH BY HIS PADDLE WE SHALL WIN!!!!!!!!!
darksabre Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 PUT IN ENROTH PUT IN ENROTH BY HIS PADDLE WE SHALL WIN!!!!!!!!! Okay, you convinced me. :clapping:
X. Benedict Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 PUT IN ENROTH PUT IN ENROTH BY HIS PADDLE WE SHALL WIN!!!!!!!!! Well, I guess when you put it that way....... :thumbsup:
nobody Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 Not quite a Luongo or Schneider should start thread but it's along the same lines. Thread title - Game 5 will be Lu's career if he chokes thats it Fans are pretty much the same everywhere. Even the logic for and against Luongo's performance sounds eerily similar. And, like here, a couple posters take a controversial position and the rest of the community jumps like its 5 times the number in agreement. Gawd I luv the interweb. Prior to the playoffs I read an article indicating if the Canucks didn't win the Cup that they would blow up their team - starting with their high priced #1 goaltender Luongo.
LGR4GM Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 Prior to the playoffs I read an article indicating if the Canucks didn't win the Cup that they would blow up their team - starting with their high priced #1 goaltender Luongo. Sabres call dibs on Kesler and Ehrhoff
darksabre Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 Prior to the playoffs I read an article indicating if the Canucks didn't win the Cup that they would blow up their team - starting with their high priced #1 goaltender Luongo. And that just seems silly when you look at the talent on that team. It'd be like Detroit blowing it up every time they don't win the Cup.
shrader Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 Prior to the playoffs I read an article indicating if the Canucks didn't win the Cup that they would blow up their team - starting with their high priced #1 goaltender Luongo. 4 of their d-men are UFAs, so that blowing up is going to start right there. Luongo's got a 12 year contract, if they actually wanted to move him, it will be tough.
X. Benedict Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 And that just seems silly when you look at the talent on that team. It'd be like Detroit blowing it up every time they don't win the Cup. I don't think they'll be able to afford Erhoff and Bieksa. But I don't see major changes at forward for them.
darksabre Posted April 20, 2011 Report Posted April 20, 2011 I don't think they'll be able to afford Erhoff and Bieksa. But I don't see major changes at forward for them. Right. They don't need to "blow it up" at all. They'll have enough natural turnover that the face of the team will be altered slightly. It's the same thing the Wings do every year.
rsxfirefighter Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 Well I guess its a good thing Lindy doesnt read these message boards. Two Wins now for Miller....and if you notice the team that scores first in all 4 games have won... GO SABRES!!!
Figster Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 On second thought, nawww, lets not start Enroth,lol What a game Ryan Miller!!!!! :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:
Jerry Jabber Posted April 21, 2011 Author Report Posted April 21, 2011 On second thought, nawww, lets not start Enroth,lol What a game Ryan Miller!!!!! :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: I'll have to eat a big bowl of crow on this one. This was the best game I've ever seen Miller play! :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:
Figster Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 I'll have to eat a big bowl of crow on this one. This was the best game I've ever seen Miller play! :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: I'm eating crow with you buddy, cheers :beer:
nobody Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 I vote the Sabres replace Miller with Enroth in the 2nd game and then start Enroth in the 3rd game.
OverPowerYou Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 Whoever started this thread should rethink his/her life. Should Enroth start Game 4? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no.
Miss_The_Amerks Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 I'll say it. Granted, I was going either way on this. Glad Miller played well tonight, but I'd still like to see it happen more often, you dont need shut outs to play great. But I still stand by what I said. Needs to be more consistent to earn $6.2m to me. I just don't want to be that guy that says he's the greatest thing that ever happened after saying he could be better. On another note, he was solid tonight. I was generally impressed with our defensive end work tonight.
elcrusho Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 I'll say it. Granted, I was going either way on this. Glad Miller played well tonight, but I'd still like to see it happen more often, you dont need shut outs to play great. But I still stand by what I said. Needs to be more consistent to earn $6.2m to me. I just don't want to be that guy that says he's the greatest thing that ever happened after saying he could be better. On another note, he was solid tonight. I was generally impressed with our defensive end work tonight. 2 playoff shutouts in 4 games.... WINNING
Miss_The_Amerks Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 2 playoff shutouts in 4 games.... WINNING I mean dont get me wrong. The shut outs are insane, and he's played insane in both. But I still find games 2 and 3 being "meh" performances.
KD in CT Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 I mean dont get me wrong. The shut outs are insane, and he's played insane in both. But I still find games 2 and 3 being "meh" performances. What was 'meh' about his game 3 performance? He stopped everything he had any reasonable chance at. No goalie can win a game if his defense is as bad as the Sabres were in game 3.
SDS Posted April 21, 2011 Report Posted April 21, 2011 What was 'meh' about his game 3 performance? He stopped everything he had any reasonable chance at. No goalie can win a game if his defense is as bad as the Sabres were in game 3. He certainly had at chance at the first one for sure.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.