BuffaloFansR_Crazy Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Patty K will be back on Sunday against the NY Islanders. If you're Lindy, do you leave the lineup alone or sit someone? If you are sending a player to pine county, who?
Lanny Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Put him on the wing with Gaustad and Grier. Or move McCormick to that line and play him with Gerbe & Byron. Either way Neidermayer should sit.
thesportsbuff Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Neidermayer is the obvious choice to sit even ahead of Connolly but it's tough to say what Lindy will do... wouldn't be surprised if Kaleta continues to sit.
BuffaloFansR_Crazy Posted February 11, 2011 Author Report Posted February 11, 2011 No way Kaleta sits. Should be Niedermayer, but most likely Byron goes back to Portland.
X. Benedict Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 No way Kaleta sits. Should be Niedermayer, but most likely Byron goes back to Portland. kaleta sits. you don't bust this up yet.
billsrcursed Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 kaleta sits. you don't bust this up yet. I agree with this, but if I'm Nieds, I'm praying we don't lose another game all year.... :unsure:
Weave Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 I think Niedermayer is most deserving but I expect Byron will be back in Portland. The head scratcher will be that Byron is a center. So what happens at center? Kaleta plays wing on McCormick's line and McCormick moves over to center? That would make for the least amount of disruption.
Lanny Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 I think Niedermayer is most deserving but I expect Byron will be back in Portland. The head scratcher will be that Byron is a center. So what happens at center? Kaleta plays wing on McCormick's line and McCormick moves over to center? That would make for the least amount of disruption. Prob would put Niedermayer at center, and he and Gaustad center Gerbe/McCormick or Kaleta/Grier.
kwalk Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 'Nieds, Gaustad, Grier' is Buffalo's most persistent line. We've watched Lindy long enough to know that he values veterans. He consistently puts these guys out there when the lead is being defended or when they need a goal. There is no way, short of injury, he benches anyone on this line. Like or dislike Nieds, he's playing. We ALL know it. It doesn't matter what their points are/aren't. Lindy will play them.. oh.. Kaleta sits. Let him really heal up.
dumb_dumb88 Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 I think Niedermayer is most deserving but I expect Byron will be back in Portland. The head scratcher will be that Byron is a center. So what happens at center? Kaleta plays wing on McCormick's line and McCormick moves over to center? That would make for the least amount of disruption. Most likely what is going to happen. Sad too really. Byron, Ennis and Stafford line was really clicking. It's the only thing I don't like about Lindy Ruff's coaching, the constant line combination switching.
TheMadCap Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Most likely what is going to happen. Sad too really. Byron, Ennis and Stafford line was really clicking. It's the only thing I don't like about Lindy Ruff's coaching, the constant line combination switching. agree, that and the lousy handling of the goalie situation. I mean, is Miller REALLY going to play every single game from here on out? Or is it more likely that once Portland's season is over, they bring Enroth up for a few games?
nfreeman Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 'Nieds, Gaustad, Grier' is Buffalo's most persistent line. We've watched Lindy long enough to know that he values veterans. He consistently puts these guys out there when the lead is being defended or when they need a goal. There is no way, short of injury, he benches anyone on this line. Like or dislike Nieds, he's playing. We ALL know it. It doesn't matter what their points are/aren't. Lindy will play them.. oh.. Kaleta sits. Let him really heal up. Good call. Most likely what is going to happen. Sad too really. Byron, Ennis and Stafford line was really clicking. It's the only thing I don't like about Lindy Ruff's coaching, the constant line combination switching. It's been TC-Ennis-Stafford and Byron-Gerbe-McCormick (with Vanek subbing for Gerbe on occasion) for the last couple of games.
Eleven Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Kaleta should sit. He's a good hitter/agitator, but I don't see much else from him unless the Sabres are playing the Rangers.
carpandean Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 I'm guessing Pat sits until they lose, then Byron goes back down.
LabattBlue Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Kaleta should sit. He's a good hitter/agitator, but I don't see much else from him unless the Sabres are playing the Rangers. Knowing that Lindy won't sit Niedermayer or Grier, the obvious move is to send Byron back to Portland, and get Kaleta back in. PS As far as what Kaleta brings to the table, lets flashback to how he was most recently injured...Despite having an injured hand, he lays out to block a shot from the point. How many Sabres forwards do you see going down to block shots EVER?
shrader Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 This question seems pointless to me. We all know Kaleta will be back on the injured list in a day or two anyway.
Skibum Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Does Byron have the kind of contract that allows him to stay up indefinitely? I could see him getting sent back down either way. He has cooled off considerably since his hot start. Gerbe has been pretty invisible lately, too. Maybe he gets the hook for a while.
Kelly the Dog Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Lindy clearly loves the veterans and won't sit Neids, so it's pretty obvious when Kaleta gets back that Byron goes back to Portland. He's done it 100 times. Lindy clearly hates to mess with what's working and even when injured players get back he sits them until the lineup that's winning starts to lose. He's done it 100 times. Hmmmm... I'm with X on this one. I think Kaleta sits on Sunday. If we win, he probably sits until we lose.
LET"S GO BUFFALO Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 agree, that and the lousy handling of the goalie situation. I mean, is Miller REALLY going to play every single game from here on out? Or is it more likely that once Portland's season is over, they bring Enroth up for a few games? We are looking to make the Playoffs right now, this is our season, every game matters and can't be wasted, once we are in and hopefully comfortable, miller will get a rest. Right now he is coming off a huge rest period as per the All Star break and can handle this load while we make the playoff push, sadly even Enroth doesn't keep us in all the games that Miller has played so far, he is the real reason we are winning....
X. Benedict Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 'Nieds, Gaustad, Grier' is Buffalo's most persistent line. We've watched Lindy long enough to know that he values veterans. He consistently puts these guys out there when the lead is being defended or when they need a goal. There is no way, short of injury, he benches anyone on this line. Like or dislike Nieds, he's playing. We ALL know it. It doesn't matter what their points are/aren't. Lindy will play them.. oh.. Kaleta sits. Let him really heal up. Neidermeyer and Grier have been effective in lockdown. Having them is like driving a backhoe. It ain't gonna look very sexy, but you can get some useful stuff done with a backhoe.
dumb_dumb88 Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Neidermeyer and Grier have been effective in lockdown. Having them is like driving a backhoe. It ain't gonna look very sexy, but you can get some useful stuff done with a backhoe. Until they meet teams like Philly, Boston or Pittsburg in the Eastern Conference. Then they become liabilities. They are basically useless for any type of playoff run. Especially against a team like Philly where their "effective lockdown" style will be useless. These guys need to go in my opinion.
shrader Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Does Byron have the kind of contract that allows him to stay up indefinitely? I could see him getting sent back down either way. He has cooled off considerably since his hot start. Gerbe has been pretty invisible lately, too. Maybe he gets the hook for a while. He's in the first year of his 3 year entry level deal. He's a long way off from being waiver eligible (I'm not sure on his age, but his limit should be somewhere around 80-120 NHL games). He's obviously not hitting that limit any time soon, so he's free to move back and forth as much as they want him to. The only other issue in play is that once the trade deadline passes, there is a limit on the number of non-emergency AHL callups. Neidermeyer and Grier have been effective in lockdown. Having them is like driving a backhoe. It ain't gonna look very sexy, but you can get some useful stuff done with a backhoe. I get the backlash against Neids, but I don't think it has been completely justified. He's here to play defense, not to score goals. Grier's a +4 and Neids is a -1. Those are some solid numbers considering their complete lack of offense. As a whole, they're getting the job done in their end of the ice. Someone needs to do it. I'm not aware of any stat for it, but I'd love to see something on the PK efficiency of specific players. Something like power play goals allowed per minute of shorthanded ice time. I haven't paid enough attention to notice which PKers are typically on the ice when the team gives up PP goals.
X. Benedict Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 Until they meet teams like Philly, Boston or Pittsburg in the Eastern Conference. Then they become liabilities. No they don't. 45 seconds left. 1 goal lead. Draw in the defensive zone. Boston throws out Lucic, Krieji, Horton Nieds, Gaustad, Grier make a ton of sense in that scenario.
dumb_dumb88 Posted February 11, 2011 Report Posted February 11, 2011 No they don't. 45 seconds left. 1 goal lead. Draw in the defensive zone. Boston throws out Lucic, Krieji, Horton Nieds, Gaustad, Grier make a ton of sense in that scenario. Not to me they don't. The lack of speed and any type of puck control ability will kill them, as it always does. They play a great deal of their game in their own zone or nuetral zone, not really a recipe for success. I've seen Grier and Nieds cough the puck up so many times this season.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.