bunomatic Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Is it any coincidence Rivet was out there looking lost on that Bruins goal?
Fire Lindy Ruff NOW Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 I honestly don't think Sylvester is THAT bad. A little excitable on the goals, but I've heard worse. sylvesters pretty good id say. definately better than the other dude.
NowDoYouBelieve Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 I swear, I've never seen a team so deficient at getting a lead and then locking it down. I realize we hosted our own comeback this game, but our success last year was based on taking 1 or 2 goal leads into the 3rd period and KEEPING THEM! This year, it's almost a given that the equalizer is coming at some juncture.
TheMatrix31 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Just got the opportunity to turn on the stream. What in God's name is going on?!
Iron Crotch Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.
bunomatic Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Bruins are schooling the sabres this period.
SwampD Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Is Miller going to stop anything tonight?
deluca67 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Is Miller going to stop anything tonight? Nothing but playoff hopes.
Thedefeated Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 I don't care how many times the D breaks down in front of Miller, he is a goalie...he gets paid a salary to stop the puck from going in the net. Maybe he could try a little bit harder.
bunomatic Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 10-1 shots. Its not all Millers fault this period.
Thedefeated Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Not saying it is all his fault. Though I have grown awful tired of his dumb founded looks every time someone scores on him.
deluca67 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 10-1 shots. Its not all Millers fault this period. If it were 10-9 in shots would it be any different?
WanderingEye Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 sylvesters pretty good id say. definately better than the other dude. I would agree with this. Sylvester is doing OK. At least he doesn't have a bizarre voice like Mark Jeanneret.
TheMatrix31 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 If it were 10-9 in shots would it be any different? Maybe we'd have another goal? :) .....MAYBE.
bunomatic Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 If it were 10-9 in shots would it be any different? Well it would show that Millers teammates had put in an effort.
repster Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 I'm so sick of Neidermeyer's lack of hustle. Brutal choice of UFA this year. Then again, most of these guys look like they are going through the motions
Iron Crotch Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 DREW!!!! Another hat trick against the B's! Wow!
repster Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Staff infection!!!!!! Wow, on the replay, Thomas actually got a piece of it too.
JujuFish Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Has stafford scored since that hat trick night? Has he scored a hat trick since the hat trick night? Why yes, yes he has. :thumbsup:
Iron Crotch Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 A dozen regulation goals. Wide open hockey. I like what 2011 has to offer this far. :D
repster Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Sekera and Hecht almost find a way to gift wrap the win for Boston. Geez. Sloppy
Iron Crotch Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Stafford already has 13 goals in just 23 games. He had 14 in 71 games last year.
TheMatrix31 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 A dozen regulation goals. Wide open hockey. I like what 2011 has to offer this far. :D Yeah, frustration of giving up six goals aside......this is a blast to watch.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.