Thedefeated Posted December 3, 2010 Report Posted December 3, 2010 http://tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=447 Tied for second in +/- with Montador at plus 16 Who would have thought he would be doing so well, especially after an ocular problem.
Stoner Posted December 3, 2010 Report Posted December 3, 2010 http://tsn.ca/nhl/te...ers/bio/?id=447 Tied for second in +/- with Montador at plus 16 Who would have thought he would be doing so well, especially after an ocular problem. Yeah, who woulda thunk it? Wonder if Pegs was scratching his head over that move too.
SDS Posted December 3, 2010 Report Posted December 3, 2010 As Lindys biggest critic, you should have thunk it. Personally, I find a great deal of the criticism here terribly illogical. If OSP won't spend the money, Darcy is off the hook for not bringing in high dollar FAs. If Lindy has a terrible PP and is offensively lacking, then maybe Vanek gets some slack? So, it makes sense if Lindys system/style is flawed that some of the better talent that leaves will find success.
Stoner Posted December 3, 2010 Report Posted December 3, 2010 As Lindys biggest critic, you should have thunk it. Personally, I find a great deal of the criticism here terribly illogical. If OSP won't spend the money, Darcy is off the hook for not bringing in high dollar FAs. If Lindy has a terrible PP and is offensively lacking, then maybe Vanek gets some slack? So, it makes sense if Lindys system/style is flawed that some of the better talent that leaves will find success. You getting snow down there? Must be interfering with your sarcasm receiver.
inkman Posted December 3, 2010 Report Posted December 3, 2010 Loods was always a solid, good NHL defenseman. He was prone to one really huge gaff every other game but he didn't cost his team games. He'd be welcome on my team any day.
bob_sauve28 Posted December 3, 2010 Report Posted December 3, 2010 As Lindys biggest critic, you should have thunk it. Personally, I find a great deal of the criticism here terribly illogical. If OSP won't spend the money, Darcy is off the hook for not bringing in high dollar FAs. If Lindy has a terrible PP and is offensively lacking, then maybe Vanek gets some slack? So, it makes sense if Lindys system/style is flawed that some of the better talent that leaves will find success. No way, the guy is making $50 million and isn't even in the top FIFTY in league scoring. I think he deserves criticism. Or perhaps the decsion to keep him for instead of the house ransome offered us was just stupid.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.