wonderbread Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 sweet you heard it here first. Nice work Vanek-man
biodork Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Really Harry? Are you sure it wasn't 58 feet?
wonderbread Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Really Harry? Are you sure it wasn't 58 feet? It was at least that. Heck that's a country mile as I see it.
biodork Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 It was at least that. Heck that's a country mile as I see it. lol I love his unnecessarily specific estimations of distance.
SarasotaSabre Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Harry, was it 58 or 59 feet out? My life is really hanging in the balance to know - make up your freaking mind, you d-bag. NO ONE GIVES A RAT'S A$% HOW MANY FEET OUT HE SHOT FROM, YOU TOOL. GO BACK TO CBC, PLEASE...... :wallbash:
bob_sauve28 Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Does anyone think Stafford will be back with TV and Roywhen healthy?
NowDoYouBelieve Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Does anyone think Stafford will be back with TV and Roywhen healthy? I sincerely hope he's not. Roy, Vanek, Ennis are beginning to look like our first true "number one line" since 2007.
Bob Goulet Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 why do we put grier and kaleta on the pp, idc how bad it is those two aren't gonna make it any better
biodork Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 I sincerely hope he's not. Roy, Vanek, Ennis are beginning to look like our first true "number one line" since 2007. Agreed - Stafford's shoulder injury may have been the best thing that happened to Vanek (aside from his sweet goal Sat. night).
waldo Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Does anyone think Stafford will be back with TV and Roywhen healthy? that would be a mistake if this line continues to play this way...
NowDoYouBelieve Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 By the way, Montador is up to +14 on the season with that goal. PLUS-14! How is that possible on a team that's underachieved so badly to start the season.
TheMatrix31 Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 By the way, Montador is up to +14 on the season with that goal. PLUS-14! How is that possible on a team that's underachieved so badly to start the season. Dumb luck that I got him for my fantasy league, lol.
Calvin Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 why do we put grier and kaleta on the pp, idc how bad it is those two aren't gonna make it any better because they are scrappy and fight for the puck. i'd rather see them on the PP than the lazy 'skill' who create more chances for the other teams when we're on the PP.
Two or less Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 now we get to see firsthand what an effective PP unit looks like. wow. oh Santa, can we get a PP unit like that for xmas? is it too early to ask? Not for Christmas, but if the Sabres want to show the fanbase they are committed they will break the bank to sign Ehrhoff. Guy is the PPQB this team is desperate for.
kishoph Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Does anyone think Stafford will be back with TV and Roywhen healthy? Does he have to come back ? :doh: They should send CONNELLY out to keep him company.
X. Benedict Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Remember in Spaceballs when they made the jump from Light Speed to Plaid to Ludicrous Speed. I think Vanek has made the jump to Plaid. - Vancouver looks like the Spring 2006 Sabres. They come in waves. Vigneault was probably watching a lot of Sabres in 2005-06 - I think it will take 5 goals to win this. - Kicking myself for not being there tonight. Vancouver is fun to watch.
bob_sauve28 Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Seems like a lot of Vancouver fans there
X. Benedict Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 that was a dive. Pays off though.
wallybarthman Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 That was a incredibly stupid penalty by Meyers
Calvin Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 silly penalty there by Myers, to the best road PP in the league. didn't learn from Hecht's equally silly one in the 2nd
Ghost of Dwight Drane Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Remember in Spaceballs when they made the jump from Light Speed to Plaid to Ludicrous Speed. I think Vanek has made the jump to Plaid. - :clapping: And Connolly has gone from suck, to blow. I like Vancouver a bunch too. I was fired as a consultant after the 1st when none of the 45 foot floaters made it in the net.
X. Benedict Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 That was a incredibly stupid penalty by Meyers Chintzy.
SarasotaSabre Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 Anyone notice how many times Harry is wrong about his observations (i.e.,goals, assists, penalties)...) ? He prematurely called a penalty on Hecht for going after the Vancouver d-man who ran Pominville - then RJ & Rayzor quickly corrected Harry. Love to hear this tool made to look like the fool he is. I can almost detect a hint of satisfaction when RJ puts Harry in his place.
bob_sauve28 Posted November 16, 2010 Report Posted November 16, 2010 When you have stars like the Sundins you are never out of a game. Stars make a difference
Recommended Posts