LabattBlue Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 What an odd title for an article. DR waited a year too long to trade him, I doubt they are going to have him sit in the press box with his salary and I don't think DR has the balls to waive him as the love affair continues. My guess is that he will play his 60-65 games(sucking most of the time) and be injured for the rest. http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/story/804173.html
wonderbread Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 This guy goes from top d pairing to possibly sitting in the press box. How the mighty have fallen. I expect him to play this year and show improvement.
jwcolour Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 I expect him to play this year and show improvement. Contract year... stranger things have happened.
LabattBlue Posted September 23, 2009 Author Report Posted September 23, 2009 Contract year... stranger things have happened. Similar to the fantastic production we saw from Max and Kotalik during their "contract years"? ;)
macsabre Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 What an odd title for an article. DR waited a year too long to trade him, I doubt they are going to have him sit in the press box with his salary and I don't think DR has the balls to waive him as the love affair continues. My guess is that he will play his 60-65 games(sucking most of the time) and be injured for the rest. http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/story/804173.html Typical WNY Sports Negativity.
LabattBlue Posted September 23, 2009 Author Report Posted September 23, 2009 Typical WNY Sports Negativity. Me or the Buffalo News? :lol:
inkman Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 Typical WNY Sports Negativity. Uh, did you read the piece? I didn't sense one negative thing about it. It was stating the facts.
... Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 Similar to the fantastic production we saw from Max and Kotalik during their "contract years"? ;) Yeah, I'm not buying into the Contract Year Theory at all, and those two are prime examples why.
macsabre Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 Uh, did you read the piece? I didn't sense one negative thing about it. It was stating the facts. The article was factual. The projection that he will suck and be injured the rest of the time is a bit negative don't you think? I do expect this is Hanks last year as a Sabre no matter what happens.
shrader Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 Yeah, I'm not buying into the Contract Year Theory at all, and those two are prime examples why. It's probably about 50/50, but the one's who fail never get mentioned. The incentive of playing in a contract year has to be a motivating factor for most though.
... Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 It's probably about 50/50, but the one's who fail never get mentioned. The incentive of playing in a contract year has to be a motivating factor for most though. You would think, but it seems to NOT happen more than it does.
LabattBlue Posted September 23, 2009 Author Report Posted September 23, 2009 The projection that he will suck and be injured the rest of the time is a bit negative don't you think? It may be negative, but it is not unrealistic. :doh:
wjag Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 If he is truly in shape, who knows... He may not be the whipping boy of the message boards...
jad1 Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 It may be negative, but it is not unrealistic. :doh: I thought it was a positive article in that Tallinder had some nice things to say about Meyers.
shrader Posted September 23, 2009 Report Posted September 23, 2009 You would think, but it seems to NOT happen more than it does. Motivation doesn't guarantee success.
SabresFan526 Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 I would love to see Tallinder get back to his 2005-2007 form. Personally, I felt he's been playing extremely tentative for the last 2 years. He broke his arm twice and hurt his shoulder, so I guess you can't blame him. But for the style of defenseman that he is, he cannot play tentatively. He must be confident in order to play well. I think he can definitely get back to where he was, but for him, it's more mental than physical. The question is can he mentally get back to where he was? I hope so for Buffalo's sake, but I don't know.
North Buffalo Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 Hank is at it again tonight, just got out played in the corner by Blake and it ended up in the back of the Sabres net.
deluca67 Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 It may be negative, but it is not unrealistic. :doh: I know negative. Sir, you were not negative. This is negative. As far as Tallinder. His problems are not the injuries or deteriorating skills. Tallinder's problem is that fear has crept inside his game. He plays with such a pronounced fear of getting injured that it effects every aspect of his game. He rushes passes to avoid defenders baring down on him. He spins away from contact in the corners freely giving the puck away. Any physicality that may have been a part of his game is gone. A new contract, new coach or new team can't drive that fear away. This may not only be his last year with the Sabers. It is more than likely his last in the NHL. No team is going to waste cap space on a player who skates scared.
Eleven Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 I know negative. Sir, you were not negative. This is negative. As far as Tallinder. His problems are not the injuries or deteriorating skills. Tallinder's problem is that fear has crept inside his game. He plays with such a pronounced fear of getting injured that it effects every aspect of his game. He rushes passes to avoid defenders baring down on him. He spins away from contact in the corners freely giving the puck away. Any physicality that may have been a part of his game is gone. A new contract, new coach or new team can't drive that fear away. This may not only be his last year with the Sabers. It is more than likely his last in the NHL. No team is going to waste cap space on a player who skates scared. Now THIS is a DeLuca post I can believe in. I think it's right on.
end the curse Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 I know negative. Sir, you were not negative. This is negative. As far as Tallinder. His problems are not the injuries or deteriorating skills. Tallinder's problem is that fear has crept inside his game. He plays with such a pronounced fear of getting injured that it effects every aspect of his game. He rushes passes to avoid defenders baring down on him. He spins away from contact in the corners freely giving the puck away. Any physicality that may have been a part of his game is gone. A new contract, new coach or new team can't drive that fear away. This may not only be his last year with the Sabers. It is more than likely his last in the NHL. No team is going to waste cap space on a player who skates scared. No, this is truth. Great post.
rbochan Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 What an odd title for an article. DR waited a year too long to trade him, I doubt they are going to have him sit in the press box with his salary... Yep. And they'll send Myers down... sigh... A hearty #%^$#! YOU HANK.. you worthless pile of drivel.
LabattBlue Posted September 24, 2009 Author Report Posted September 24, 2009 I know negative. Sir, you were not negative. :lol:
North Buffalo Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 :lol: They should just release Hank, he makes too many mistakes, doesn't play hard enough in the corners any more and his once awesome outlet passes are pedestrian at best. Too bad Hank is a shadow of his former self, I miss that self.
cdexchange Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 You guys are all forgetting his mad shootout skillz :bag:
inkman Posted September 24, 2009 Report Posted September 24, 2009 They should just release Hank, he makes too many mistakes, doesn't play hard enough in the corners any more and his once awesome outlet passes are pedestrian at best. Too bad Hank is a shadow of his former self, I miss that self. Releasing him will cost the Sabres 2/3 of his salary. I think it will still count against the cap for the next 2 years. So that's roughly 2 mil per for a non-roster player. Can they even afford to do that while paying his replacement? It would have to be Myers or Weber because they make less than the difference between Hank current salary and 2/3 of his salary, roughly 1 million dollars.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.