Cereal Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 Things have been a bit dull here the past couple weeks. I mean, I am a strong recycling advocate, but.. I feel like I'm going to be even less excited for the start of the season than last year. Don't get me wrong... It's always exciting for hockey to start back up again, but the 'hopeful' factor was pretty low last year, and as of now that factor is significantly lower (than last year). Maybe we'll be surprised and we'll get a deal like we've been waiting for; but, camp opens up in in what - 2, 3 weeks? And nothing's happened in awhile here. I guess I went into the summer hoping they'd shake things up more in the first two lines (I was particularly hoping to see Roy traded while his value is relatively high)... you know send a message, do something different. What's going to be different this season?
wjag Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 I start with the same optimism I start every season with. The first few weeks are essential. Playing well begets winning. Winning begets a winning culture. Winning begets more winning... The Sabres have enough talent to be competitive. The only question is how competitive. Win early and this could be an interesting season.
carpandean Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 Win early and this could be an interesting season. They won early last year ... and then lost a lot.
Realist Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 Although I'm looking forward to the hockey season, my hopes are not high at all for this season. There have been no real changes, only very minor tweaks. I'm just hoping for a 7th or 8th seed in the playoffs.
LabattBlue Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 I'm not getting my hopes up for a playoff appearance this year unless DR pull off a trade involving Tallinder, Hecht or one of the top 6 forwards(actually only 5 as I don't think there is another forward who should be on the top 2 lines besides Roy, Vanek, Pominville, Stafford and Connolly). Some of the depth moves for Portland are what they are and Mike Grier is a nice plus, but what changed on the team that is going to get them out of a playoff hiatus that is 2 years and running?
Stoner Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 I'm not getting my hopes up for a playoff appearance this year unless DR pull off a trade involving Tallinder, Hecht or one of the top 6 forwards(actually only 5 as I don't think there is another forward who should be on the top 2 lines besides Roy, Vanek, Pominville, Stafford and Connolly). Some of the depth moves for Portland are what they are and Mike Grier is a nice plus, but what changed on the team that is going to get them out of a playoff hiatus that is 2 years and running? Maybe the Jack Adams winner who is adored in Buffalo, for whom, according to many fans, there is no better replacement in all of hockey, should coach the m-effin team into the playoffs!
Mbossy Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 I'd say I'd love for the Sabres to make the playoffs, but it'll be a hard battle. What I'd like to see this year Vanek to score 50 goals Pominville to hit someone. Hard. Connolly to last the whole season and average a point per game (just to piss off Deluca :w00t: ) Hecht to be gone before the deadline. Gerbe to come up and play like he's done in the minors. Butler, Sekera, Myers and Weber to get ice time and keep progressing. Lindy to play the back up goalie more often. Grier to give some leadership to this team. Paille to step up or step out. Lydman and Tallinder to play for 10-11 contracts, just not here. Now if all this were to happen we just might make the playoffs, but we know this world ain't perfect.
SwampD Posted August 27, 2009 Report Posted August 27, 2009 Maybe the Jack Adams winner who is adored in Buffalo, for whom, according to many fans, there is no better replacement in all of hockey, should coach the m-effin team into the playoffs! Oh, no you di'int!
Cereal Posted August 27, 2009 Author Report Posted August 27, 2009 They won early last year ... and then lost a lot. Yeah they started 6-0-2 or something like that. Shortly after, the late comeback win from two down vs. Minnesota to win in OT made me believe we could sneak into the 6-8 spot.
henysgol Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 I think we're definitely going to see a more physical team this year. Montador and Grier are good additions in my opinion, and Rivet will be nice and healed up. I think we're going to see Gaustad play better, with the influence of the other hard nosed guys on the bench. Hopefully Mair will do the same. I think we'll see Vanek, Miller and Connolly dazzle us, especially if they stay healthy. I think Chris Butler will emerge as a very important part of our defense, as well as Sekera. This year's team is better than last year. I'm not going to miss Spacek even though I like him, we have better replacements. I'm not getting overly excited about this year, but I think the Sabres will at least make the playoffs.
deluca67 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 Maybe the Jack Adams winner who is adored in Buffalo, for whom, according to many fans, there is no better replacement in all of hockey, should coach the m-effin team into the playoffs! Maybe he would if his GM would stop flooding his roster with 4th liners and sub-AHL talent. :thumbsup:
Rox11 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 I think we're definitely going to see a more physical team this year. Montador and Grier are good additions in my opinion, and Rivet will be nice and healed up. I think we're going to see Gaustad play better, with the influence of the other hard nosed guys on the bench. Hopefully Mair will do the same. I think we'll see Vanek, Miller and Connolly dazzle us, especially if they stay healthy. I think Chris Butler will emerge as a very important part of our defense, as well as Sekera. This year's team is better than last year. I'm not going to miss Spacek even though I like him, we have better replacements. I'm not getting overly excited about this year, but I think the Sabres will at least make the playoffs.
Rox11 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 I think everyone has got to be looking forward to being a playoff team - and more importantly - a much more physical team. I, too, think booth Goose and Mair will only be more aggresive since they will not be the only ones expected to hit. And for all of the overhaul up in Montreal - and lots of not much here - the Hockey News puts Buffalo ahead of the Habs. Baseball to me is a yawner, so I can't wait for the start of the NHL.
Rox11 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 I think everyone has got to be looking forward to being a playoff team - and more importantly - a much more physical team. I, too, think booth Goose and Mair will only be more aggresive since they will not be the only ones expected to hit. And for all of the overhaul up in Montreal - and lots of not much here - the Hockey News puts Buffalo ahead of the Habs. Baseball to me is a yawner, so I can't wait for the start of the NHL.
end the curse Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 I think it's realistic to expect this team to qualify for the playoffs, and if they do anything can happen. I hope for the best, but remember that in the end we are still Buffalo.
Stoner Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 Maybe he would if his GM would stop flooding his roster with 4th liners and sub-AHL talent. :thumbsup: Lindy's happy with the roster. He gets the final vote. No more excuses for the head coach, please.
cdexchange Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 Lindy's happy with the roster. He gets the final vote. But how do you really know either of these statements to be true?
Cereal Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Posted August 30, 2009 I, too, think booth Goose and Mair will only be more aggresive since they will not be the only ones expected to hit. When did we trade for David Booth?? :ph34r: Wouldn't mind having that guy, actually..
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.