LabattBlue Posted August 20, 2009 Report Posted August 20, 2009 http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=22597&blogger_id=1 "Talking to an NHL source I am told that the Sharks are on the verge of making a "relatively significant" deal that would help clear the cap space needed to get them back into the Heatley game. The deal I am told may be with Dallas or Buffalo..."
jwcolour Posted August 20, 2009 Report Posted August 20, 2009 As if Buffalo could afford to take on more money.
LabattBlue Posted August 20, 2009 Author Report Posted August 20, 2009 As if Buffalo could afford to take on more money. It all depends on how much money is leaving! ;)
BamBam Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=22597&blogger_id=1 "Talking to an NHL source I am told that the Sharks are on the verge of making a "relatively significant" deal that would help clear the cap space needed to get them back into the Heatley game. The deal I am told may be with Dallas or Buffalo..." Much needed vacation....again. haha.
jwcolour Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 It all depends on how much money is leaving! ;) Well it'd have to be some sort of 3 way if they are doing it to clear cap and so are weee wee weee
inkman Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 For a website that just makes stuff up, you think they would do 5 minutes of homework to realize Buffalo doesn't have expendable cap room. I think like many posters around here, they are operating under false assuptions, the whole Sabres are cheap/low payroll BS.
K-9 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 Well it'd have to be some sort of 3 way if they are doing it to clear cap and so are weee wee weee Look, I'm not one to pass judgement on what people do in the privacy of their own homes. But this particular 3-way or menage-a-trois for our French-Canadian friends, has all the makings of something that even Caligula or the Marquis de Sade (again for our French-Canadian friends) would touch with a ten foot er, um, pole. GO SABRES!!!
nobody Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 Well it'd have to be some sort of 3 way if they are doing it to clear cap and so are weee wee weee The original talk was that the Sharks didn't have the pieces to send back to Ottawa so they were looking for another team to get involved. So SJ would funnel some money to Ottawa and some to the other team.
red Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 The original talk was that the Sharks didn't have the pieces to send back to Ottawa so they were looking for another team to get involved. So SJ would funnel some money to Ottawa and some to the other team. Anybody care to speculate exactly whom on the Sharks roster we could realistically obtain that would fix some of our needs? I mean, there supposedly has been some discussions in recent seasons of the Sharks wanting to unload Patrick Marleau since I seem to recall this past season being the make or break year for him.
SwampD Posted August 21, 2009 Report Posted August 21, 2009 Anybody care to speculate exactly whom on the Sharks roster we could realistically obtain that would fix some of our needs? I mean, there supposedly has been some discussions in recent seasons of the Sharks wanting to unload Patrick Marleau since I seem to recall this past season being the make or break year for him. According to Eck, San Jose wants to unload Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Santa's cap hit is too big and The Bunny never really lived up to his potential.
red Posted August 22, 2009 Report Posted August 22, 2009 According to Eck, San Jose wants to unload Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Santa's cap hit is too big and The Bunny never really lived up to his potential. Ok, Eck's outstanding lack of credibility notwithstanding, anyone care to speculate or have a San Jose wish list? IS Marleau a reality, or is his salary too high for him to be a realistic option?
red Posted August 22, 2009 Report Posted August 22, 2009 Ok, so I know that this Eck guy is horrible... Marleau would fill the skill and size needs the Sabres are currently building/ lacking... But the salary of $6.3 million seems very un-Sabre-like... Patrick Marleau | #12 - Left Wing(?- I thought he was a center) Birthdate: September 15, 1979 Age: 29 Birthplace: Aneroid, Saskatchewan Height: 6'2 Weight: 220 lbs. Shoots: Left Salary: $6,300,000 NHL Seasons: 11 Drafted by San Jose in 1997 (1/2)
red Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 ok, everyone...I know that this may not be necessary...but here is another example of Eck predicting something being done or "close" to being done (as stated in the introductory link), but nothing (read: NOTHING) happened this weekend involving any of these teams. Is this guy just a total , or is he schizo or something?
inkman Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 Is this guy just a total , or is he schizo or something? Yes.
nucci Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 Ok, so I know that this Eck guy is horrible... Marleau would fill the skill and size needs the Sabres are currently building/ lacking... But the salary of $6.3 million seems very un-Sabre-like... Patrick Marleau | #12 - Left Wing(?- I thought he was a center) Birthdate: September 15, 1979 Age: 29 Birthplace: Aneroid, Saskatchewan Height: 6'2 Weight: 220 lbs. Shoots: Left Salary: $6,300,000 NHL Seasons: 11 Drafted by San Jose in 1997 (1/2) His salary is more than just un-Sabre-like. SJ wants to dump him and probably not finding too many interested.
jwcolour Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 Never fear, now he has Sykora supposidly down to Philly, Buffalo, NJ. I guess we can atleast say that without Eck we'd have nothing to talk about in this crappy offseason.
deluca67 Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 For a website that just makes stuff up, you think they would do 5 minutes of homework to realize Buffalo doesn't have expendable cap room. I think like many posters around here, they are operating under false assuptions, the whole Sabres are cheap/low payroll BS. I'm just not seeing many "Sabres are cheap" posts. I see mostly that the Sabres are mismanaged, poor talent evaluators and married to their mistakes. Which are all pretty strong points.
red Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 I'm just not seeing many "Sabres are cheap" posts. I see mostly that the Sabres are mismanaged, poor talent evaluators and married to their mistakes. Which are all pretty strong points. Is there anyway to email that clown and bring his idiocy to his attention?
LabattBlue Posted August 28, 2009 Author Report Posted August 28, 2009 Yes! Marleau could still become a Sabre. :D Stafford, Tallinder and a 4th? :beer: http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/300-am-Sharks-closing-in-on-Deal-Again-Marleau/1/22694
SwampD Posted August 28, 2009 Report Posted August 28, 2009 Yes! Marleau could still become a Sabre. :D Stafford, Tallinder and a 4th? :beer: http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/300-am-Sharks-closing-in-on-Deal-Again-Marleau/1/22694 I have always hated headlines(or thread titles) that are statements,..but have a question mark after them.
korab rules Posted August 28, 2009 Report Posted August 28, 2009 Yes! Marleau could still become a Sabre. :D Stafford, Tallinder and a 4th? :beer: http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/300-am-Sharks-closing-in-on-Deal-Again-Marleau/1/22694 I would do this deal all day long and twice on sunday. The sabres, however? I don't see it. Too wedded to Staf's "potential". Marleau is who Stafford will be in a couple years. Unlike the Sabres to pay for a player who has "it" now when they feel they have the same player in their system who will have "it" in a year or two, who they can pay less in the meantime. Makes it tough to field a consistent winner when half your roster is always a few years short of reaching their potential.
LabattBlue Posted August 28, 2009 Author Report Posted August 28, 2009 I would do this deal all day long and twice on sunday. The sabres, however? I don't see it. Too wedded to Staf's "potential". Marleau is who Stafford will be in a couple years. Unlike the Sabres to pay for a player who has "it" now when they feel they have the same player in their system who will have "it" in a year or two, who they can pay less in the meantime. Makes it tough to field a consistent winner when half your roster is always a few years short of reaching their potential. My post was tongue in cheek. The SJ GM would be checking his calendar to see if it is April 1st.
henysgol Posted August 30, 2009 Report Posted August 30, 2009 I can't believe I just wasted 30 seconds to read Eklund's unfounded drivel. Who are these "sources" he talks to. Sounds like a BS artist.
LabattBlue Posted August 30, 2009 Author Report Posted August 30, 2009 Marleau and Kaberle! Get ready for the parade next June! http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/Sabres-looking-to-improve-on-D-Kaberle-Heatley-Kessel-Devils/1/22722 :lol:
Eleven Posted September 9, 2009 Report Posted September 9, 2009 I just heard Gerbe for Langston Walker, to add size and toughness. The rarified E6, too. Bam, you really are slacking.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.