Jump to content

Sabres Punching Bag


inkman

Pick one  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is going to drop 'em?

    • Adam Mair
      2
    • Craig Rivet
      7
    • Paul Gaustad
      1
    • Mike Weber
      0
    • Steve Montador
      12
    • A re-signed Andrew Peters
      4
    • A group effort
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

Rivet will beat peoples ars.

 

Montador will get his ars beat, although he'll at least drop 'em.

 

Mair will stick out his tongue and beat someone's ars in the locker room.

Posted

Between Rivet, Gaustad, Mair, Kaleta, Montador & Weber(if he makes the team), they will be fine. In fact they should be better in that regard than last year.

Posted

Rivet rarely if ever loses a fight. I'm going with Montador as the Sabres punching bag. He will fight, and he will most likely lose most of them, but he'll dance, that's for sure. Mair is not too bad and neither is Goose. I think the Sabres will be fine in the toughness department so long as everyone's healthy. No need for Peters in my mind.

Posted

Rivet and "the bull" are probably the most likely candidates. I would like to see Kaleta take up the "so called" role of Peters and start dancing with some of the big boys.

Posted
I would like to see Kaleta take up the "so called" role of Peters and start dancing with some of the big boys.

Why? Kaleta is small. He plays big, but he's barely a medium weight. He should not be fighting "big boys" that Peters fought, because he's not even close to their weight class. Gaustad is the closest, size-wise, to being a heavy-weight and Rivet is probably the closest skill-wise. Any of Gaustad, Rivet and Mair would have a better chance against a true heavy weight than Kaleta, but even they should avoid those true enforcer types. Kaleta is an agitator, not an enforcer, and shouldn't/couldn't touch Peters' old role. The question is whether a team needs a real enforcer any more? If yes, then that person is not currently on the roster and it's certainly not Kaleta.

Posted
The question is whether a team needs a real enforcer any more?

 

Good question.

 

Last season I thought most if not all of the enforcer-type fights I saw were a waste of time. Which is different than saying ANY fight is a waste of time, I couldn't agree with that. Watching the playoffs this season, there were no staged enforcer fights that I recall. To me, that says the game doesn't need it, and therefore the enforcer role is a waste of roster space. Unless, of course, the enforcer is a good player and worth having on the roster simply because of his game.

Posted
Why? Kaleta is small. He plays big, but he's barely a medium weight. He should not be fighting "big boys" that Peters fought, because he's not even close to their weight class. Gaustad is the closest, size-wise, to being a heavy-weight and Rivet is probably the closest skill-wise. Any of Gaustad, Rivet and Mair would have a better chance against a true heavy weight than Kaleta, but even they should avoid those true enforcer types. Kaleta is an agitator, not an enforcer, and shouldn't/couldn't touch Peters' old role. The question is whether a team needs a real enforcer any more? If yes, then that person is not currently on the roster and it's certainly not Kaleta.

THANK YOU.

Posted

Lindy was asked if there's still a place for the enforcer in the game. And he said yes -- until the games really start to matter in the playoff race and in the playoffs themselves. At least he gave one honest answer yesterday.

Posted

If there is still a place for an enforcer in the NHL, then the Sabres have not had one since Ray and May left.

 

Peters is a joke and at his salary should have been gone long ago.

Posted
the "sabres punching bag" should be sitting in golisano's office and have a season ticket holder's face on it.

The second time I laughed out loud tonight. Yous Guys is funny.

Posted
Between Rivet, Gaustad, Mair, Kaleta, Montador & Weber(if he makes the team), they will be fine. In fact they should be better in that regard than last year.

 

Wow, just reading those names actually frightened me for a second.

 

No it didn't.

 

We are not a tough team. Gawd, look at those names.

 

No Rays, no Hartmans, no Tuckers.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...