wonderbread Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Ales Kotalik signs with the NY Rangers. link?
SDS Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 I think every goalie in the league knows that, but most still can't make the save. It will be interesting to see how Miller does against it. It is a pretty sick move. Getting a puck up like that on the backhand is not uber-easy.
Stoner Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Al seems like an NYC guy. Fashionista. Enigmatic fella. Likes the anonymity. He might just thrive there.
Swedesessed Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Anyone know the terms of the Kotalik deal?
wonderbread Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Anyone know the terms of the Kotalik deal? 3 million 3 years. Thats a good deal imho.
Swedesessed Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 3 million 3 years. Thats a good deal imho. Thanks but just read here its 3 years, 9 million... http://tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=11850 In that case... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
wonderbread Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Thanks but just read here its 3 years, 9 million... http://tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=11850 In that case... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: No shiit Slats is frigging nuts. 3 per year?
shrader Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Oh man, I bet his former team mate Chris Drury talked him into it, seeing as they're buddies n all. ;) Hopefully this works out as well for them as the Kalinen signing. So you're suggesting that they'll package him for a trade deadline rental?
Calvin Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Thanks but just read here its 3 years, 9 million... http://tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=11850 In that case... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: waaay overpaid.. trade fodder maybe?
carpandean Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 I was really hoping that he would stay out West. Now, I'll have to explain to everyone again how of the four SO losses that we will inevitably suffer against the Rangers, having him vs. not having him would likely have only cost us one point and that's assuming that having him on the Sabres wouldn't have prevented us from even reaching the shootout in the first place or, conversely, that he didn't actually keep the Rangers from beating us in regulation. Oh well, at least he's not in the Northeast. ;)
Stoner Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 I was really hoping that he would stay out West. Now, I'll have to explain to everyone again how of the four SO losses that we will inevitably suffer against the Rangers, having him vs. not having him would likely have only cost us one point and that's assuming that having him on the Sabres wouldn't have prevented us from even reaching the shootout in the first place or, conversely, that he didn't actually keep the Rangers from beating us in regulation. Oh well, at least he's not in the Northeast. ;) Yes, do explain everything to us. Very slowly. We're not Mensa material.
nfreeman Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 I'm glad for Al, who seems like a perfectly nice guy, but that is a ridiculous move by the Rangers. Further evidence of Sather's bozo-ness. Also further evidence that "at least they're doing something" is a shortsighted way to evaluate a team's offseason.
Stoner Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 I'm glad for Al, who seems like a perfectly nice guy, but that is a ridiculous move by the Rangers. Further evidence of Sather's bozo-ness. Also further evidence that "at least they're doing something" is a shortsighted way to evaluate a team's offseason. Ted Bundy seemed perfectly nice. So did George Bush in October 2000.
thesportsbuff Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 hey i heard the sabres (re)signed someone today
sabresman17 Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 hey i heard the sabres (re)signed someone today Yeh Matt Ellis nothing big though.
X. Benedict Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 I'm glad for Al, who seems like a perfectly nice guy, but that is a ridiculous move by the Rangers. Further evidence of Sather's bozo-ness. Also further evidence that "at least they're doing something" is a shortsighted way to evaluate a team's offseason. Nice contract for Al. His agent did a nice job What I would love to know is who did Sather think he was bidding against?
X. Benedict Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 McKee to Pitt....1 year 800K <_< that's Doug Janik money...
darksabre Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 McKee to Pitt....1 year 800K <_< that's Doug Janik money... ugh, that's going to suck to watch Jay in a Pens uniform. :cry:
Ted's Hot Dogs Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 I dont understand why we let go of kotalik..when everybody would just skate around losing the puck...he would be the only one to shoot,,and my god he can shoot
thesportsbuff Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 McKee to Pitt....1 year 800K <_< that's Doug Janik money... that pisses me off so much. if the FO doesn't think Jay McKee is an upgrade over both Tallinder and possibly Sekera then I don't like our chances of contending any time soon. For that kind of money... wow
Calvin Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 that pisses me off so much. if the FO doesn't think Jay McKee is an upgrade over both Tallinder and possibly Sekera then I don't like our chances of contending any time soon. For that kind of money... wow McKee was the past - he is not the player now that he was as a Sabre Sekera is the future, pushing him lower down the pecking order does not help the team in any which way Tallinder and Hecht - when they were playing great everyone here was solidly on the bandwagon. when they played crap like last season, suddenly everyone's hating on them. ups and downs will happen - i highly doubt Tallinder gets traded. the Sabres orgzn is becoming famous for giving players second, third, fourth, nth chances..
Calvin Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 I dont understand why we let go of kotalik..when everybody would just skate around losing the puck...he would be the only one to shoot,,and my god he can shoot absolutely.. he can shoot. unfortunately, he had one of those seeing-eye shots about once every ten games. not good enough. besides, for a boy his size, he was sure dainty on his feet and rarely went into the corners - after all, he didn't want to mess his do or put any wrinkles in his sweater. i will miss his SO ability though. oh well.
cdexchange Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 ugh, that's going to suck to watch Jay in a Pens uniform. :cry: Look at it this way: the guy now has a great chance to get his name on The Cup. I for one would love to see that. :thumbsup:
Eleven Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 McKee to Pitt....1 year 800K <_< that's Doug Janik money... Now I'm pissed. I was not pissed when the Sabres refused to overspend, but now it appears the team isn't even making value moves (and it will be tough to convince me that McKee's agent didn't contact Regier in the last 10 days). This would have been a no-brainer.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.