qwksndmonster Posted August 17, 2016 Report Posted August 17, 2016 I didn't mention it at the time, but that last song I posted is my cousin's Brooklyn based duo Cool Company. If you like funky R&B they have a new album coming out in the next couple days. They are sick. Check em out. Anyways, I heard this song in the background of a Samsung commercial today and looked it up. It's sick. https://youtu.be/re-GsEwi0IY Quote
Huckleberry Posted September 18, 2016 Report Posted September 18, 2016 Some girl played this for me last week , not a fan of R&B, but .... Quote
Hoss Posted September 29, 2016 Report Posted September 29, 2016 http://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/495773081/first-listen-conor-oberst-ruminations Conor Oberst's new album 'Ruminations' Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 It's my birthday and I feel nostalgic. I miss the early to mid 80's ... I was 20, or 21, when this song came out. Quote
darksabre Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 In light of the discussion in the awesome thread and my desire to see this thread get more traffic, I'm changing the title to The Music Thread. Quote
WildCard Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 What was it before? Songs stuck in your head? Quote
darksabre Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 What was it before? Songs stuck in your head? Yup. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 In light of the discussion in the awesome thread and my desire to see this thread get more traffic, I'm changing the title to The Music Thread. So long as Eleven and his heresy/trolling about The Beatles is banned herefrom, I'll contribute. Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Boy Band!! Boy freakin' Band!! Until 1969 and then they couldn't take it anymore. Quote
darksabre Posted October 6, 2016 Author Report Posted October 6, 2016 So long as Eleven and his heresy/trolling about The Beatles is banned herefrom, I'll contribute. The Beatles are totally a boy band. And I say that as someone who really likes The Beatles. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Boy bands are Svengali'd. John and Paul met at a church fete. Boy bands perform music written for them by others. Lennon and McCartney are two of the more accomplished songwriters of the 20th century, and as a team, probably unrivaled. I could go on. Maybe later I will. This is nonsensical hottakery of the highest order. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Also, I think this thread should be locked because it has become so deeply offensive. Quote
darksabre Posted October 6, 2016 Author Report Posted October 6, 2016 Also, I think this thread should be locked because it has become so deeply offensive. :lol: Listen, I'm not saying The Beatles weren't artists. But there are plenty of boy band members who are great artists too. JT anyone? The Beatles started the whole idea of marketing "heart throbs" to teenagers. No one had ever marketed music to teens before. They paved the way for the boy bands and record label money grabs of the late 90's. It's all The Beatles' fault. Quote
SwampD Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Boy bands are Svengali'd. John and Paul met at a church fete. Boy bands perform music written for them by others. Lennon and McCartney are two of the more accomplished songwriters of the 20th century, and as a team, probably unrivaled. I could go on. Maybe later I will. This is nonsensical hottakery of the highest order. This. Boy bands are assembled. The Beatles were discovered. There is a difference. The Monkeys were a boy band. :lol: Listen, I'm not saying The Beatles weren't artists. But there are plenty of boy band members who are great artists too. JT anyone? The Beatles started the whole idea of marketing "heart throbs" to teenagers. No one had ever marketed music to teens before. They paved the way for the boy bands and record label money grabs of the late 90's. It's all The Beatles' fault. Yeah. No one ever did that before the Beatles. Quote
darksabre Posted October 6, 2016 Author Report Posted October 6, 2016 This. Boy bands are assembled. The Beatles were discovered. There is a difference. The Monkeys were a boy band. Yeah. No one ever did that before the Beatles. Elvis_Presley_-_TV_Radio_Mirror,_March_1957_01.jpg Elvis is a whole different animal. Is there any doubt The Beatles were more commercialized than him? Quote
That Aud Smell Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Listen, I'm not saying The Beatles weren't artists. But there are plenty of boy band members who are great artists too. JT anyone. Well thank God for confirmation that The Beatles were artists. And please don't ever put Timberlake in the same breath (or belch) as The Beatles. And I like Timberlake just fine. Quote
SwampD Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Elvis is a whole different animal. Is there any doubt The Beatles were more commercialized than him? I have my doubts. http://www.imdb.com/list/ls059414601/ Quote
Sabel79 Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 Elvis is a whole different animal. Is there any doubt The Beatles were more commercialized than him? Innumerable doubts, yes. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 The Beatles started the whole idea of marketing "heart throbs" to teenagers. No one had ever marketed music to teens before. They paved the way for the boy bands and record label money grabs of the late 90's. It's all The Beatles' fault. The marketing of The Beatles had plenty of predecessors that foretold their arrival -- John the Baptists, if you will. And The Beatles weren't the first in a line of such bands. They were, are an entity and phenomenon unto themselves. Sui generis. I think I'm more aggravated and disappointed by The Beatles as boy band talk than I could be by anything in the politics thread. Elvis is a whole different animal. Is there any doubt The Beatles were more commercialized than him? What?! This is madness. Quote
darksabre Posted October 6, 2016 Author Report Posted October 6, 2016 The marketing of The Beatles had plenty of predecessors that foretold their arrival -- John the Baptists, if you will. And The Beatles weren't the first in a line of such bands. They were, are an entity and phenomenon unto themselves. Sui generis. I think I'm more aggravated and disappointed by The Beatles as boy band talk than I could be by anything in the politics thread. What?! This is madness. I know. I'm just arguing it to be annoying. I actually don't care either way. :P Quote
SwampD Posted October 6, 2016 Report Posted October 6, 2016 I know. I'm just arguing it to be annoying. I actually don't care either way. :P If that's your way of admitting you were wrong, then we accept your apology. :P right back atcha. Quote
darksabre Posted October 6, 2016 Author Report Posted October 6, 2016 If that's your way of admitting you were wrong, then we accept your apology. :P right back atcha. I'm totes wrong. I just gotta stick up for my boy Eleven. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.